User talk:TheEpTic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This page was last edited or modified by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk, contribs) on Monday 4:16:36 September 28, 2015 (UTC).


Your request for WP:AWB[edit]

Hello TheEpTic. Certainly you have been around a while and you do good work on anti-vandalism. The usual criterion for AWB is 500 non-automated edits, which is thought of as deliberate changes to articles, not just reverting vandalism. For instance, adding content or improving the wording. Please consider re-applying after you've done more of that kind of work. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)


Ce.ase your actions ag.ainst the m!i!g!o!s!y!r!n! c!l!a!n or fa.ce the cons.quences you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solidliquidsolidus (talkcontribs) 16:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

What? TheEpTic (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015[edit][edit]

(Your Opinion) Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Contest to kill 100 people using a sword— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

(My answer) Thank you for your opinion.This is the most important points of "Contest to kill 100 people using a sword" issue. One time "Contest to kill 100 people using a sword" was called as false story and the 2 officers did not kill the Chinese soldiers cruelly. The reason is that "The hand-to-hand fightingclose combat with Japnese swords were unrealistic at the modern warfare, by Mr.Yamamoto, Shichihei, a famous Japanese Journalist. In addition, only three persons could be cut ,for a short battle, with any Japanese sword, he said referring to the book written by a sword smith." But, it became later the real one, after the specialist studied as follows,"But, the sword contest was not a kind of hand-to-hand combat but the killings were more likely executions of Chinese war prisoners, as Tsuyoshi Noda (野田毅?) said publicly to the Japanese Citizens[1]. In addition, Ikuhiko Hata, a conservative historian also received information on what Tsuyoshi Noda (野田毅?) spoke to the Japanese citizens in Kagoshima, Japan, at his home town's public meeting that the victims were only Chinese POWs[2] and other testimonials includng 'by Shintaro Uno' in above mentioned "Postwar Accounts".

The dispute is showing whether "Contest to kill 100 people using a sword" is real or not. (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ Monthly Magazine on Japan,'Chugoku (China)' in Dcember Issue,1971 P43
  2. ^ Nihon University, Ho-Gakkai『Seisaku Kenkyu』42 Kan 4 Go