User talk:TheHandOfQueenErotica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Talkback[edit]

Hello, TheHandOfQueenErotica. You have new messages at Talk:Mug shot publishing industry.
Message added 15:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Primefac (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Mug shot publishing industry, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Mug shot publishing industry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mug shot publishing industry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see that since being warned for edit warring above, you have not edited the page. I'm going to unblock you because of this - you weren't given fair warning and given the opportunity to stop first. Please make sure that you discuss the dispute on the article's talk page - don't edit war ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]