User talk:TheOnlyOne12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sources[edit]

There's an user that has recently started to add notes and opinions of a non professional writer on all the most famous albums articles from the 70's, 80's, 90's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews I presume, next in line, he'll add it to the Oasis albums. So the community decided to give this week the final verdict on this subject. Each user is invited to reply shortly. Could you say what you think about it here? Thanks. Woovee (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring on Julian Casablancas[edit]

You pretty clearly broke the three revert rule on Julian Casablancas. The only reason I'm not blocking you is because it happened 6 hours ago. In the future, please don't edit war and discuss the issue instead. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your signature / timestamp[edit]

Hi there. I noticed when you made a request at WP:RFPP that you seem to be manually adding the timestamp to your posts. For example, on the post i've just linked to, your signature says 23:30 28th January, when the actual time was 05:30 28th Jan. Looking through some of your other talk page edits, I think you're adjusting your signature time to your local time? If that's the case, can you please not do that, and just use the four tildes ~~~~ method. It's important that everyone uses the same timezone on an international site like this one, otherwise it gets very hard to work out from a signature when someone has left a comment and the order that a discussion happened in. Thanks! GedUK  13:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...[edit]

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 04:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Querying an edit of yours[edit]

Hi, this edit seems to re-introduce a whole lot of undesirable features, including overlinking. Rationalising wikilinks makes it a little more likely that readers might actually click on them—this is long-established practice. Do we have to have hashes instead of "No." for albums? (We unwilling accept this for comic books, but this is the first time I've heard of it for albums.) There's a deceptive link for audio engineer (better that than "engineer").

Interested to discuss this: I've temporarily watchlisted this page for the purpose. Tony (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

thanks[edit]

hi, thanks for explaining your change to Talking Heads! i was not aware of this convention. sorry for the inconvenience! ~ Boomur [] 19:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

No problem! I should have clarified more in my edit summary. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Removing "studio albums" from discography sections[edit]

Please stop removing the header "Studio albums" from discography sections, as you did in edits such as these [1] [2]. There is a purpose for this header in these sections: Sure, "we all know" and take for granted—as Wikipedia editors who frequently work on these articles—that where there is a hatnote to a separate discography article, the section only lists studio albums, but we can't expect every reader of the encyclopedia to know that intuitively. If a general reader comes across a "Discography" section in an article and sees "for more information, see x discography" but then sees a list of releases below it, they'll likely wonder why some albums are being listed in the section while others are excluded. The small header "Studio albums" communicates to a reader what the content of the list is: Just the artist's studio albums, so they should see the discography article for other releases. This is a form of summary style, and since the "Studio albums" header is used in many articles I ask that you please discuss it with other editors before you go around removing it. --IllaZilla (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Actually, please continue. Adding it is not necessary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Walter, please see my reply at User talk:IllaZilla#It's not about partial lists. --IllaZilla (talk) 15:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
IllaZilla, unless you can show me there's some kind of guideline explaining the header "studio albums" needs to be in the discography sections, I see no point in you reverting all of my edits just so it can fit your point of view. I noticed you only added these header sections to articles that I've edited on. Why not add this to every discography section? That's not the case here. I think most general readers would know studio albums belong in the main discography section. Can you tell me why there's no "studio albums" header for Bob Dylan's or Michael Jackson's article? TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 17:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Infobox musical artist lists[edit]

Template:Infobox musical artist#cite note-lists-1 and I quote: For short horizontal lists of two or three items, comma separators are acceptable, but for longer lists the use of

or is preferred as they offer a benefit to users of screen readers.

So, no, "flatlists are generally used now" is not correct. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, TheOnlyOne12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Oasis revert[edit]

Please see this discussion to why I made those changes and please chime in if you have an opinion. I don't agree with the formatting changes but they are valid. --Jennica / talk 20:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Pollinator (album)[edit]

To further explain my revert of you at Pollinator (album), which was done primarily to send you a message as I was not sure a talk page message was necessary, I would not supply an extra reference in the note parameter if it were not necessary. To avoid writing entirely manual markup that will just be changed later (! scope="row"| Austrian Albums<ref></ref> in this case), I add a temporary reference before the site the template uses (austriancharts.at, in this case) updates. Please check that the main source has updated if you remove these temporary references. I am quite sure that at the time you removed the source from the article, the main source had not updated, which left the peak unverified for a matter of time. In future, please do not remove the extra source until the main template link has updated with the information. Thank you. Ss112 20:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is/Are[edit]

When referring to a collective, 'is' not are is correct British English (although 'are' is increasingly tolerated). So, for example, The 1975 is one band. Consequently, it is referred to in the singular. (BTW 'self-titled' means only that the band, not the record company, say, chose the title of their album. The correct word is 'eponymous'.)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live In Japan 2002.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Live In Japan 2002.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)