User talk:ThePromenader

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your GA nomination of Paris[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Geojournal -- Geojournal (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!
Is there any particular place we can follow this process, and perhaps make improvements as it progresses? Best, THEPROMENADER   12:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC) i
(talk page stalker) The link to the ongoing review is here.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paris[edit]

The article Paris you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Paris for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Geojournal -- Geojournal (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! THEPROMENADER   07:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


Amoureux de Paris.

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Thank you for quality article work around Paris, restoring its GA splendour, such as Chemin de fer de Petite Ceinture, for adding images of the city of light, for "The infobox is finally done - but the map coordinates could use some work." and "Amoureux de Paris.", - merci, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, but I was far from alone in that! But I'm touched, thank you very much, your appreciation makes it all seem worth it ; ) ; ) ; ) THEPROMENADER   14:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The best thing about Wikipedia is that you are not alone. - I just asked two people who speak French for help with François Bott, translated by LouisAlain, and needing better sources. I found two books where he's mentioned, but can't read them, [1] and [2], - is there something to support the facts, or something to add? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not familiar with the author, but those redlinks aside, the article looks pretty good. The best I can do is add a 'cn' (citation needed) tag on any challengable claims.
As for citing the book, it depends on what evidence you're looking for... if you can tell me what claim you're trying to support, I can have a look. Cheers! THEPROMENADER   15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
It's rather the simple things that are not covered by the present sources, such as studies, work with the three papers mentioned (from - to), - any paragraph without a citation will be questioned, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


Congratulations on getting GA Status for Paris. Your determination and good work made all the difference. Whats your next challenge? Best wishes and thanks SiefkinDR (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

No, YOU, sir, you've by far outdone me. FA status, of course! ; ) THEPROMENADER   20:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chemin de fer de Petite Ceinture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Paris/Sandbox2[edit]

Ambox warning orange.svg Wikipedia:Paris/Sandbox2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Paris/Sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Paris/Sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 20:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)