User talk:ThePromenader

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Rue Alibert[edit]

I've just translated the French article on Rue Alibert, I used Google translate and a bit of common sense. Hope this is helpful! - Letsbefiends (talk) 08:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I'll look it over - thanks for the heads-up. THEPROMENADER   10:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Done! Thanks for the heads-up. THEPROMENADER   08:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I like it! Thanks. - Letsbefiends (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hey, anytime. I have to get back to that 'street project', thanks for the reminder ; ) THEPROMENADER   07:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

As expected[edit]

Not surprised about this [1], I expected it from you. You may have fooled many on ANI but some of us who have worked on Paris know better. Don't expect me to sit silently and not participate on Paris. Just because I haven't edited the article in close to a year does not mean I quit. Expect me around. Caden cool 06:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

[2] ? Please don't project your personal feuds on unconcerned contributors. I'll be removing this. THEPROMENADER   06:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
LOL personal feuds? Please. Oh and btw I have participated on Paris talk, genius. Caden cool 07:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I have no idea who you are, only that you seem to be dogging Dr. Blofeld. THEPROMENADER   07:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
LOL Nice try. Does this refresh [3] your memory genius? Caden cool 07:36, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I did forget that. And I came to your page to apologise to you (for Statistiker trying to get you involved in feud (his) that was not yours). That was a pretty funny comment, by the way ; ) THEPROMENADER   07:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
LOL're a real piece of work. Caden cool 07:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I often don't have to try too hard ; ) THEPROMENADER   07:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [4]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)