Jump to content

User talk:The Anome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Support request with team editing experiment project

[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, The Anome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

NHRP detaggables

[edit]

So, I ended up here: User:The Anome/NHRP detaggables because of this redirect, Skeleton Cave Massacre Site. I recently created Skeleton Cave (Arizona), and when I was linking other pages to the article, I found the detaggables page. In scanning your list, I came across Work, John, House and Mill Site which I then linked to John Work House and Mill Site which has existed since 2006.

It occurred to me that there may be a number of pages already in existence, but since they are not formatted the same as what's on this page, they aren't being identified as being done. I'm trying to think on how to solve this problem. --evrik (talk)

Notice

The article Punk Bunny Coffee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement, and I can barely find any sources following the name change.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Self-trouting for inadvertently deleting the entire Reform UK article

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Tech News: 2026-13

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-14

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

[edit]

Hello, The Anome. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Religion and the Decline of Magic".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Tech News: 2026-15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:17, 13 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates that never get checked

[edit]

Can you take a look at the coordinates for Tapaktuan, a town in Indonesia? It seems that they have pointed into the water for c. 20 years. The Anomebot2 added the coords in December 2006. A user came along in October 2022 and changed them from 3°15′N 97°10′E, to 3°15′0″N 97°10′0″E, which is unhelpful. Is there any way that a list of some of the "worst offenders" of these over-rounded coordinates could be generated? Abductive (reasoning) 08:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed this particular one by hand. I think the best way of finding these is probably comparing them with something like OpenStreetMap - although we cannot, for copyright reasons, use their data as a source, I cannot think of any reason not to use them as a sanity check, particularly if we fuzz the locations slightly before comparison to prevent it from being used for triangulation. It would be a good idea to get this checked by someone knowledgeable in copyright law before attempting this, though. — The Anome (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to automate the sanity check? Abductive (reasoning) 21:39, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It would have to be automated - there are millions of coordinates to cross-check. — The Anome (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How did you derive them in the first place? Abductive (reasoning) 23:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You'd start by looking at containment hierarchies, both on Wikipedia and OSM. For example, United Kingdom -> England -> Wiltshire -> Salisbury is unique on Wikipedia, and also the corresponding path https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/62149 -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/58447 -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/57533 -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3404205 is unique on OSM. Using these as disambiguators, we can often establish 1:1 relationships with high reliability. Where there is ambiguity - for example if there were two different places called 'Salisbury' in Wiltshire in either database - we refuse to make the link. Once we have a candidate 1:1 mapping, we look up the coordinates/boundaries on both OSM and Wikipedia/Wikidata and then compare. If there's a candidate match, then we have something we can flag on Wikidata as a likely mapping to an OSM identifier; if there's a mismatch, we can flag it on Wikipedia as suspicious and needing manual review. We keep a log of pages we have processed so we don't re-flag things repeatedly. To the best of my knowledge, this is compatible with the OSM license terms; see [18].

User:The Anomebot2 works in quite a similar way to this, using GNS data as the reference; unlike OSM, GNS coordinates are public domain so we can put them into articles, rather than just making metadata matches. — The Anome (talk) 15:08, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to do a test run? I've been working on improving coordinates for years now, and it's my experience that Italy is the worst, both for lack of corrections by other users, and for the coordinates missing the towns by more than the usual. Abductive (reasoning) 08:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've just posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates about this; expect any work to take weeks, if not months, as this is a long-term background project for me. — The Anome (talk) 08:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I look forward to it. It would be nice to see D°M′S° blossom where now there is only D°M′. Thanks for your consideration. Abductive (reasoning) 08:55, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]