User talk:The Anome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svgThis user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Support request with team editing experiment project[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here:, I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, The Anome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Tech News: 2019-04[edit]

20:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks - and another revdel[edit]

Hi, thanks for doing the necessary cleanup job for the edit summaries by the Muslim hater. I think this edit and its ES should also be revdeled, though. (Not in all caps so less in-your-face offensive, but still.) Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for spotting that. -- The Anome (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Large numbers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Large numbers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Large numbers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Glenn Howerton[edit]

I noticed that you recently hid a revision in the history of Glenn Howerton. However, the same content has been added and removed multiple times (back to at least Nov 14, 2018). So if one edit containing this content should be hidden, then presumably all of them should be hidden. Cheers. Peacock (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trump pee tape[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Trump pee tape, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 93 (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Trump pee tape listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump pee tape. Since you had some involvement with the Trump pee tape redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 93 (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-05[edit]

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Mind-ray listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mind-ray. Since you had some involvement with the Mind-ray redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-06[edit]

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-07[edit]

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)