User talk:The Banner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
I try to the best of my knowledge and belief to contribute to the small red block of the image

The Signpost: 16 December 2015[edit]

London Borough templates: tube and rail stations discussion open[edit]

Hello and a Happy Christmas. Thanks for your recent contributions, improving London's coverage. I would like to invite you to: Category talk:London borough templates.- Adam37 Talk 15:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015[edit]

2016[edit]

Happy New Year .jpg
Happy New Year 2016!
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters.
   – Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, The Banner![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

January 2016[edit]

Regarding my previous edit at Big Four international beauty pageants, I've added info about the new ownership of the Miss Universe that is WME/IMG. Also, I've reverted back the full list of the winners including the new winners at each big four international pageants so I don't sew anything wrong with my edits there. But I really appreciate your concern with it most especially that I'm just a Wikipedia editor for a year. That would made me more cautious in editing. Thanks for that! Plopeniopaolo (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

What you are doing is flooding the article with irrelevant information. You should stop with that. The Banner talk 16:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Miss International 2000[edit]

Note that the content you removed from Miss International 2000 has a source (diff), and as such is not WP:OR as you state in your edit summary. Please do not remove sourced content from articles. North America1000 04:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

You could have seen that it did fit in the description "irrelevant parts/fancruft". And when adding sopurces, could you take care that you add reliable and independent sources conform WP:RS instead of using related and/or company websites, North America ? The Banner talk 09:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016[edit]

Please comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Miss Earth 2015[edit]

I have removed the {{better}} template for listings that I have added reliable sources to. Why do you keep adding it back? This does nothing to improve the article. North America1000 12:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Why do you not reliable sources conform WP:RS? What you do is approving related sources. What you are doing is in my opinion close to vandalism and certainly not in the interest of the article and/or Wikipedia. The Banner talk 12:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Some of the sources I recently added include the following, which are most certainly reliable and independent. It's unclear why you think these are related to the pageant, because simply put, they certainly are not. Furthermore, the addition of reliable sources such as those I added are the not vandalism whatsoever. North America1000 12:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

But you removed the better-template from several angelopedia-sources. And that is definitely not a reliable source. That template is, in my opinion, only applicable to the source it follows, not any other source. The Banner talk 12:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Primary sources are allowed to verify content, but secondary and tertiary sources are preferred. The template was removed because a better source was added, which negated its continued existence for those entries. Also see {{Better source}} where it states, "If you have the time and ability to find a better reference, please do so. Then correct the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but to fix them." North America1000 13:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
There are repeated request for better, independent sources. And still, you add or defend related sources. The Banner talk 13:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
No. I have not added a single non-reliable source to the article. You are again mistaken regarding this matter. North America1000 13:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Your reading is awfully bad: you add or defend related sources. The Banner talk 13:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monkey Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Mesh blocks[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mesh blocks. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes[edit]

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016[edit]

RM discussion[edit]

You previously contributed to discussion on the naming of the article currently at Ring, Co. Waterford. There is currently a Requested Move discussion on that page, which you may wish to contribite to. Regards, BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Daily Stormer[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Daily Stormer. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mitsubishi Magna[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mitsubishi Magna. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Please help[edit]

We need more neutral opinions here. Please help! Thanx! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I apologize sincerely for having done something that upset you. Heve never asked for more input on an RfC before & am only trying to follow the instructions I could find and use the list that you're on. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support[edit]

Peace dove.svg Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016[edit]

Please comment on Talk:Dollar Shave Club[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dollar Shave Club. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)