User talk:The Diaz
Welcome!
|
Ways to improve Richard Saucedo[edit]
Hi, I'm PamD. Thanks for creating Richard Saucedo!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand this one-sentence stub: the source you have given gives plenty to work from. Really "X is an American composer" is not adequate for an encyclopedia article - but it's a start, thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
PamD 09:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC′
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Note[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorized discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorized for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 14:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Reversion of Hawaii[edit]
I reverted your edit to Hawaii because it created a problem with the display of {{Infobox U.S. state}}. Please try Show Preview before saving. Peaceray (talk) 05:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebec City mosque shooting conspiracy theories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. {MordeKyle} ☢ 19:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
"whitewashing" (sic)[edit]
I don't think much can be done if no good faith is assumed and we are falsely accused of trying to "whitewash" the article by reflecting reliable third-party sources accurately.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Markeith Loyd for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markeith Loyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markeith Loyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 21:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rough mugshot.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Rough mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Genesis Cornejo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Genesis Cornejo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nicole duFresne.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole duFresne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rough mugshot.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Rough mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
[edit]
On June 11 you added a hidden note (amended June 14) to the lead section of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections after closing the related RFC. I appreciate that you added the note, but as edit warring commenced soon after you adding the note and as the RFC has been partially overridden by a new consensus, it soon became obsolete. Would you kindly remove the note? Thanks. Politrukki (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Politrukki: Can you point me to the consensus that overrides my note? THE DIAZ talk • contribs 00:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Inappropriate WP:HIDDEN text can be removed at any time by any editor. Local consensus does not trump WP:NPOV and, as Politrukki has pointed out, WP:CCC and WP:OWN apply. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Examples of cases where an editor has closed a discussion, declared consensus, and no editor has challenged the consensus can be seen here and here.
- What should we do when someone adds new content to the lead – let's say that it's something which violates policies such as OR, V, or NPOV – should we just obey the note and dismiss these policies? Most regulars will probably just ignore the note, but will the note prevent non-regulars from doing improvements? Politrukki (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Template:Hispanic American name has a new comment[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Hispanic American name (August 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:Hispanic American name and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! The Diaz,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
|
Post on Jared Taylor[edit]
Hey, I promise, I'm not threatening here, but I think your statement on the Jared Taylor RfC could easily interpreted as a legal threat. If you think something is libelous, you should follow the directions at the bottom of the WP:LIBEL and email the Wikimedia foundation. For the moment, you should probably strike the comments about legal issues, and just focus on the core content policies. Nblund talk 22:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
AE notification[edit]
Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#The_Diaz Jytdog (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Burnette Chapel Church shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia is not a news source.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 18:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Steinle entry[edit]
Very humorous edit reason--Fb2002 (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Cannibalism[edit]
Thank you for your edits to Cannibalism. Ironically, the page seems to have devoured its sibling article Cannibalism (zoology). Is this a Wikipedia:Cut and paste move? If so, you may want to look at the steps suggested there for sorting out the page history and attribution, which will probably need admin help. Thanks, Certes (talk) 14:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ditto Cannibalism in humans → Human cannibalism. It is unfortunate that the privileges we non-admins have allow us to do things the wrong way but not the right way. Certes (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- I really think it might be better if you simply reverted your own edits on these pages asap and started again, this time renaming pages, rather than simply cut/pasting, which destroys all the edit histories right back to 2002. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, The Diaz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Hispanic American name, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Template:Hispanic American name[edit]
Hello, The Diaz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Hispanic American name".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
March 2018[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- MrX 🖋 22:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Your request for adminship[edit]
Hello, I'd like to let you know that I have unfortunately closed your RfA as unsuccessful per WP:NOTNOW. I recommend that you read this page if you wish to apply for adminship in the future. Thanks and best wishes. LinguistunEinsuno (Linguist111) 08:58, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Moulton Falls bridge incident for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moulton Falls bridge incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moulton Falls bridge incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Jacksonville Landing shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. Only 3 people+the perpetrator dead, even for the rest of the world that wouldn't make it a major shooting, and in the US it's just a regular minor incident.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Openlydialectic (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Mollie[edit]
Please stop trying to add this stuff to the article's lede. There's no WP:CONSENSUS for it, it doesn't accurately summarize the article text and it's UNDUE, since we don't label other murder suspects as "immigrant" or "non-immigrant" (hence it's POV). Volunteer Marek 14:30, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this change about Donald Trump the 45th president, you removed the claim that "45" is used "pejoratively ... to avoid saying his name". Your justification was that the claim was unsourced, but it is sourced here, and that link appears at the top of the entry, so your justification is not properly established. My advice to you would be to maybe self-revert and open a discussion on the article's talk page to try to achieve consensus for inclusion. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: Know Your Meme, a site much like Wikipedia where anyone can contribute (albeit its moderation), could be considered a potentially unreliable source and consensus seems to be against it on the reliable sources noticeboard. I think it would be more advisable to build consensus to include that source for the claim. THE DIAZ userpage • talk • contribs 19:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Opamacare listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Opamacare. Since you had some involvement with the Opamacare redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 17:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Théodore Monod. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, The Diaz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Richard Saucedo for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Saucedo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Saucedo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilCat (talk) 21:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
1RR[edit]
Richard B. Spencer, the article in question, is subject to a 1RR restriction, and you've now reverted three times in less than 24 hours. I will ask you politely to self-revert; otherwise, I'll file an enforcement request. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 16:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:The_Diaz reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: ). Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Block[edit]
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the one revert rule on an article which is subject to American politics 2 discretionary sanctions. The way to achieve consensus is on the article talk page, not through edit warring. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. El_C 23:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
RfC at Richard B. Spencer[edit]
Hello The Diaz. You are the person who originally opened the RfC at Talk:Richard B. Spencer#RfC: Neo-Nazi label. If we just count the votes, it seems to me that the thread is leaning toward inclusion of the 'neo-Nazi' phrase in the article. Do you have an opinion on how to judge the verdict of the RfC? Or is some other option possible? The 'neo-Nazi' question is being discussed on my talk page at User talk:EdJohnston#Bad protection request. Thanks for any opinion, EdJohnston (talk) 01:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: I can't close it since I'm heavily involved with the page, but I should remind you that the validity of each side's arguments outweighs the preponderance of votes. THE DIAZ userpage • talk • contribs 03:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- I was hoping for a comment from you about the validity of each side's arguments. My guess is that a lot of people are concerned about whitewashing, so they want to keep 'neo-Nazi' to show they are taking a firm line. Is there any alternative that would be seen as strong enough but avoids 'Nazi', assuming there is some wording that could be seen as a compromise? EdJohnston (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: Personally, I like Nblund's idea of labeling him as a "a white supremacist with close ties to the Neo-Nazi and white nationalist movements" (or similar wording). It seems that many other editors are agreeing with that too. THE DIAZ userpage • talk • contribs 04:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- I was hoping for a comment from you about the validity of each side's arguments. My guess is that a lot of people are concerned about whitewashing, so they want to keep 'neo-Nazi' to show they are taking a firm line. Is there any alternative that would be seen as strong enough but avoids 'Nazi', assuming there is some wording that could be seen as a compromise? EdJohnston (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
|
Hey, The Diaz. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! PATH SLOPU 05:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC) |
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy Birthday![edit]
Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy Birthday![edit]
Happy Birthday![edit]
 | Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, The Diaz! ----Isro! chatter 18:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
Sixth anniversary on Wikipedia[edit]
|
|
Hey, The Diaz. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
Hey, The Diaz. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Cardofk (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC) |
|
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi The Diaz! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC) |  |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
| Happy First Edit Day! Hi The Diaz! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC) | |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Happy Birthday![edit]
 | Happy birthday! Hi The Diaz! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC) | |