Jump to content

User talk:The Kazanchis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Collins (author) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Marcus Collins (author). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GSS 💬 14:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello The Kazanchis. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:The Kazanchis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=The Kazanchis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 14:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS I neither have financial gain nor personal connections in all my Wikipedia contributions! And as far as I know, I can edit or create an article of my interest and will continue to create as per the guidelines. I do not know why you claimed that I have COI with my edits. And also regarding the sockpupets, I hope the SPI will reveal the truth! I do not have a singe additional Wikipedia account than this. The Kazanchis (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits clearly indicate that you have a conflict of interest. Please do not move the drafts to the main namespace; instead, submit them for review. If you continue moving them to the main namespace, you will be reported for violating WP:COI. GSS 💬 07:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Am just wondering!! I said I do not have conflict of interest! And you keep saying I do! What is the algorithm you use to know peoples with COI? I created 3 article and you created dozens of articles. Or are you a prophet or stng? ... I can edit as I want it to be. Am not attacking you, but you know peoples could be delusional or psychotic that they start to see the unseen. So, I thinks claiming you have this this does not work here. And please go ahead and report me to WP:COI if you have solid evidence to show, right! The Kazanchis (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, let's start with File:Panduka Mahendra Jayasekera.jpg and File:Panduka Mahendra Jayasekera.jpg. How on earth did you manage to find these images on Flickr just after they were uploaded by "Chinthaka DG"? GSS 💬 08:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GSS 💬 08:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in disagreement with any editor else than you. I believe, it is you that is disrupting with false and pointless claims! I hope no Admin will block me for trying to prove my point! The Kazanchis (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any admin who see this, the user GSS has violated the more than 3 edit reverting rule and should be blocked as per the rule. The Kazanchis (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:The_Kazanchis reported by User:GSS (Result: ). Thank you. GSS 💬 09:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mahendra Jayasekera

[edit]
Notice

The article Mahendra Jayasekera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable third-party sources that establish notability. The currently cited sources provide nothing beyond passing mentions, and most are not reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS 💬 03:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Merriman

[edit]
Notice

The article David Merriman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources that establish notability. The currently cited sources offer nothing beyond passing mentions or interviews, including a few hearsay articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS 💬 03:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Merriman for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Merriman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Merriman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Collins (author) (September 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, The Kazanchis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marcus Collins (author) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marcus Collins (author). Thanks! Tavantius (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Collins (author) (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Kazanchis&oldid=1255753328"