User talk:Thebadger33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Thebadger33, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or Insert-signature.png or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! I am One of Many (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

List of Christian thinkers in science[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of Christian thinkers in science, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Fyrefly (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Thebadger33, since you often contribute to the List of Christian thinkers in science, me an one other editor are talking bout changing the scope and the content of that page. We want your input on how to better that page. Any input would be greatly appreciated. --Ramos1990 (talk) 01:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

For your tireless efforts in expanding the list of Christian scientists[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You have been very active in making the list of Christian scientists bigger with very good sources. I award you this for all of your tireless efforts. Keep up the good work. It makes a difference. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Article for Deletion/Keeping[edit]

Hey Thebadger33,

I thought you may be interested in a new article that is quite controversial. Unscientific claims in religious scriptures. Some are considering deleting it and others keeping it. There is a link to enter the discussion and vote on the merits of the new article. Want to provide your thoughts on it?--Ramos1990 (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Grand Budapest Hotel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Acceptance of evolution by religious groups may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • between a small fundamentalist minority and mainstream religious communities who embrace science” (Max Tegmark, Eugena Lee, and Meia Chita-Tegmark, “The MIT Survey on Science, Religion and Origins:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Syntax...[edit]

Hi, I noticed in passing that your edits to G. K. Chesterton and The Better Angels of Our Nature both contained unexplained usage of various types of bracket, and I wondered whether you were aware what these might be for.

Curly brackets, {{ .... }}, denote Wikipedia templates, and only do anything useful when the template whose name occurs inside the curly brackets is already defined. Otherwise you get some kind of error.

Single square brackets, [ .... ], denote a labelled hyperlink to somewhere outside Wikipedia on the World Wide Web, as [http://www.microsoft.com A software company] for example. There use in references for any other purpose has no effect, other than to confuse people; and their use around a web URL, say like [http://www.microsoft.com] does create a hyperlink, but without a name or label, the link appears just as a number, which is pretty difficult to follow.

I think you may wish to modify the edits you made to the two articles I mentioned above, and perhaps you might need to look at other edits you made also. With best wishes, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstellar (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Thebadger33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Thebadger33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)