User talk:TheresNoTime
This is TheresNoTime's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. | ||
|
||
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 | ||
|
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
[edit]Happy adminship anniversary! Hi TheresNoTime! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: aw, thank you! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 12:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- 8 years! Thanks Gerda Arendt — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 12:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju
[edit]Based on the closure, I am wondering if the behavioral evidence was examined for Sunuraju. Of any SPI I filed in the last 10 years, this is one I feel is 100% accurate. We are getting lots of issues with these SOCKS an as stated I can provide a wall of additional information to show the connection. They are very careful to avoid technical evidence. CNMall41 (talk) 17:33, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging both @Girth Summit: and @Izno: who was involved as well in case they reviewed the behavioral evidence. I didn't receive a reply to my Nov 16th comment so not sure if additional information was/is needed to evaluate. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Undid the close — might be worth following up on that SPI, given it's remained open without any further comments since the middle of November. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 18:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- I appreciate it. Normally I would move on but this SOCK is BLUDGEONING. What would you suggest as I don't want to muddy the waters with so much information that it is delayed further? I feel that I already included so much information that it is going to be time consuming for a reviewer and they may not want to review it. Not saying that is the case but want to make it as easy as possible for those reviewing and making the decision. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Undid the close — might be worth following up on that SPI, given it's remained open without any further comments since the middle of November. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 18:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks!
[edit]Just wanted to let you know that I experienced a shameful amount of excitement when I noticed that a freakin' checkuser thanked my edit! This somehow feels like a rite of passage for a new editor :3 /home/gracen/ (yell at me here) 19:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- @GracenC: heh, that's really not a big deal btw, thanks as well for introducing me to
{{User Nonbinary flag}}
(if only from your user page) — I added it to mine! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)- Funnily enough, I read WP:NOBIGDEAL right after leaving you this message. Also, glad I helped you show some enby pride; always happy to meet a fellow genderless blob! /home/gracen/ (yell at me here) 19:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
linkThings.js broken with CodeMirror 6 (Dec '24)
[edit]Hey, I enjoy your linkThings userscript so much that I forgot it wasn't core functionality. Per the title, the recent CodeMirror 6 release has unfortunately broken its functionality for the time being. It's possible you're already aware, but filing this as a courtesy (especially since I've already bugged the wrong people about it!) Thanks again in any case! Remsense ‥ 论 21:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll take a look! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 23:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Remsense ‥ 论 23:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)