User talk:Thomas Ash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome Template[edit]

I pretty much use it for people I've seen editing articles relating to Christianity/Christian theology...whether or not they are Christian. Welcome to Wikipedia! Happy editing...and merry Christmas! KHM03 22:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

New Jerusalem Study Bible[edit]

I appreciate the NJ translation (though I prefer the "old" Jerusalem to the new one), but am not familiar with the study edition. Of course, as a mainline United Methodist, I generally prefer study editions of either a Wesleyan (Reflecting God, Wesley Bible) or an academic (New Oxford, New Interpreter's) nature. KHM03 22:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


I have added the article physicalism to the entries needing attention on [1]. I have put that project into some order and your are invited to join as a participant. If you know anyone else who might be intereted, you might also ask them if they would like to participate. Currently I am the only one who has signed up. Thank you.---Lacatosias 09:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Alas, Phil of Mind is not an area of exprertise of mine. Thanks for the invite though. Thomas Ash 13:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


Kudos for starting this article & I've only just seen that the talk page at User talk:Chalst/tasks has actually been used. The article now has much flesh on it, but it needs a section on Dummett's semantic verificationism, which I'm just the prson to write, I guess... — Charles Stewart (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Softaculous[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Softaculous has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

New Internationalist[edit]

Hi Thomas Ash. I saw that you uploaded File:New Internationalist (magazine) February 2011 cover art.jpg for the New Internationalist article. You indicated that the cover was released under a Creative Commons license by the publisher. I know that their website says "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons", but that alone is probably not sufficient to use the cover image under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on Wikipedia. Were you able to get additional permission from the magazine/photographer? Thanks, Gobōnobo + c 17:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I got your response. Thank you. Additional permission may be required from the photographer that created the image used in the cover. I believe if the rights for the original photograph were completely transferred to the magazine or if they belonged to the magazine because the photographer was an employee then that step is unnecessary. I've added an information template to the summary section on the file's page that should be filled in. You may also consider documenting evidence of permission by emailing a volunteer at WP:OTRS. Sorry to be so persnickety with this. Wikipedia is strict about copyright and images without proper documentation are often deleted. Gobōnobo + c 19:06, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Popcorn.js[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Popcorn.js requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 13:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Merger with Indeterminacy of translation[edit]

As a major contributor to Indeterminacy of translation, you might be interested to comment upon a discussion at Talk:Holophrastic indeterminacy#Notability concerning the notability of Radical translation, Holophrastic indeterminacy and Indeterminacy of reference and whether these articles should be perhaps deleted or merged with Indeterminacy of translation. Brews ohare (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New Internationalist (magazine) February 2011 cover art.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:New Internationalist (magazine) February 2011 cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Thomas Ash. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)