|Bad-faith accusations, outings, and other general nonsense have forced me to retire this wiki account. If I ever edit again, it will be under a different username.|
Please don't leave
Hi timeneu22 I hope you are well? Ignore what people say. I do have a quickie question though. I wrote some informative pieces about a couple restaurants in shoreditch which are nice. Wrote about the history of them and the Vietnamese cuisine. But unfortunately they got deleted, they were informative (to the best of my knowledge) and I tried to follow the river cafe example. Please help mate
- Um, he's left. --Perseus8235 14:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi timeneu22, I would like to point out that the page I created and that you deleted Nov. 2010, Wilbur_Sargunaraj, has been created again by someone else, and seems to be a thriving, viable Wikipedia page. Hyacinth45 (talk) 00:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Hyacinth45
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello Timneu22! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
Dispute resolution survey
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite
Hello Timneu22. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.
Please click HERE to participate.
You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Template:Infobox tennis match has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk page semi-protected
Some unsavory character, no doubt editing from underneath a bridge, has left some unpleasantries on your talk page, so I've semi-protected it. Should you want it unprotected, just contact me or any other admin. Favonian (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Longevity header
Template:Longevity header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Nomination of Apple fanboy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple fanboy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtrainor (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)