Trout this user

User talk:Timotheus Canens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

My admin policy: If you believe that an admin action of mine is clearly and obviously wrong, such that no reasonable admin, fully aware of all the relevant circumstances, would have done it, you may revert it without discussing it with me in advance, as long as you notify me afterwards. In all other cases, please discuss with me first before reverting it.

Please click here to leave me a new message.
AfC submissions
Slight backlog
532 pending submissions
Purge to update


Ammad Azhar[edit]

Hi Mr. Canens, It was my first time at wikipedia and the page i made was of Ammad Azhar which has been deleted by you. The information i provided to you was all correct and would have added more links and reliable source but since i was out of city so couldnt login to see. Surprisingly i saw the page deleted. I wish you could have given me more time. Now please tell me what can i do to revive it or an asap solution as i am still in shock.

Thanks waiting for your kind reply at the earliest.

Shafaq — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shafaqammad (talkcontribs) 15:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammad Azhar was pretty clear, and the discussion ran for the normal duration (1 week). If you have reliable sources that has significant coverage of the subject that the discussion participants did not uncover, you can make a request at deletion review. T. Canens (talk) 04:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

I would truly appreciate if you could help me out here. I need to get my page back and for that i can provide all necessary reference/source. Please facilitate as im the undeletion request page keeps on popping me back to the deletion review page. or can i make the page again. please advise.

Thanks Shafaqammad (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Please make a request at deletion review, listing the sources. T. Canens (talk) 22:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

deletion of Restomod Air[edit]


The page Restomod Air was tagged for deletion because of the lack of initial third party coverage. That was rectified and verified with a the administrator that tagged the page yet it was still deleted. Could you please explain why it was permanently deleted by you? Could you help me rectify to your standards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The article was deleted per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restomod Air, where nobody supported keeping it. I just examined the links in the deleted article, and do not see significant coverage of the company (as opposed to its products) in independent reliable sources sufficient to establish notability (see WP:CORP). If you can find reliable sources providing such coverage, you can request reconsideration at deletion review. T. Canens (talk) 04:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


Hello! Back again with a recommendation. Would you consider appending an identifier to the summaries indicating the edits were made using this script? For instance, "Adding sockpuppetry tag per ... (using spihelper)". Advantages are twofold: It will let interested users know that such a nifty script exists so they can start using it, and also it will help filter edits made by scripts from non-automated contributions. Just a thought! Best MusikAnimal talk 00:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm not really inclined to do it. The use is fairly niche, plus the number of edits are fairly small, and pretty much limited to SPI pages and user/user talk pages. Not worth the all the spam, IMO. T. Canens (talk) 22:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


Trophy.png List of Miss World countries
Hi! I'm user En1206 can you put back the wikipedia of List of Miss World countries. Please! And I have a quesion, Why did you delete the List of Miss World countries page in wikipedia? Hope you read this message and Please, don't forget to put back the page in wikipedia of List of Miss World countries.

Nice Greetings! -User:En1206 En1206 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

It was deleted per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss World countries. To restore it, you need to make a request at deletion review. T. Canens (talk) 22:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: StudentVoice deletion[edit]

StudentVoice is the only representative association of school students in England, with members across the country. Despite a low public profile of late, its connections to the wider British and European student and trade union movements make the information collected on this page an important record in itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 29837129a (talkcontribs) 15:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

It was deleted per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StudentVoice. "connections to the wider British and European student and trade union movements", by itself, does not establish notability. T. Canens (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion: Time Slip[edit]

I don't believe there was a clear consensus to delete the article. There was a majority view, numerically, but articles for deletion are not bound by that. It's not a popularity vote. Liverpres (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

No, but we don't need a clear consensus either. A rough consensus is sufficient. I see one in that AFD. T. Canens (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
To have destroyed the entire article goes beyond what was reasonable in the circumstances, since discussion was revolving at the time you removed it, around improving the content. Liverpres (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:DRV is that way. And please don't recreate a deleted page - especially not by copying and pasting the deleted content in a way that breaks the license. T. Canens (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
You should have given more substantive reasons for deletion at the time. There were clearly reasonable arguments given for for keep. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC).

Closure of AfD Discussion on "Greg Laughery"[edit]

Pursuant unto WP:DELREVD, I'd like to request your opinion and to initiate a discussion with you as regards your decision to close the AfD Discussion on the Article entitled Greg Laughery. The vote was numerically set at 3 (keep), 3 (delete), and 1 (weak delete, as of today) — this latter user was solicited to give comment, and was not given adequate time to assess the responses to his/her "on-the-fence" vote. You executed closure on the discussion without comment of your own; and in the spirit of neutrally determining the value of Wiki Articles, I'd like to garner your rationale before proceeding to WP:DELREV. Thanks in advance --UBI-et-ORBI (talk) 01:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Closers weigh arguments, not count noses. Cursory keeps like "significant... output of published works" have significantly less weight when you have a comment like DGG's that actually demonstrates how the publications aren't significant; your own arguments were likewise clearly addressed and rebutted by multiple commenters favoring deletion. The debate was relisted twice and lasted 22 days, compared to the standard 7; I see no reason to keep it open for even longer. Feel free to go to DRV. T. Canens (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Time slip[edit]

Can you restore the full history and retain the redirect per WP:PRESERVE I will probably DRV this in the future. Based on my research the subject is not notable as a paranormal phenomena (which is how it was written violating WP:NPOV), however it is a notable plot device used in fiction. I will rewrite it as such. Valoem talk contrib 04:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Userfied to User:Valoem/Time slip. T. Canens (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've added tons of sources and changed to focus to fictional plot device. Let me know there are any issues. Valoem talk contrib 07:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)