User talk:Timrollpickering

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Timrollpickering
Main user page | Talkpage | Talkpage Archive miscellaneous | Talkpage Archive 1 | Talkpage Archive 2 | Talkpage Archive 3 | Talkpage Archive 4 | Talkpage Archive 5 | Talkpage Archive 6 | Talkpage Archive 7 | Talkpage Archive 8 | Talkpage Archive 9 | Talkpage Archive 10 | Talkpage Archive 11 | Talkpage Archive 12 | Talkpage Archive 13 | Talkpage Archive 14 | Talkpage Archive 15 | Talkpage Archive 16 | Talkpage Archive 17 | Talkpage Archive 18 | Talkpage Archive 19 | To Do list | Gallery | With thanks to...
Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1
  2. Archive 2
  3. Archive 3
  4. Archive 4
  5. Archive 5
  6. Archive 6
  7. Archive 7
  8. Archive 8
  9. Archive 9
  10. Archive 10
  11. Archive 11
  12. Archive 12
  13. Archive 13
  14. Archive 14
  15. Archive 15
  16. Archive 16
  17. Archive 17
  18. Archive 18
  19. Archive 19
  20. Archive 20

Welcome to my talk page.

Please note that I prefer to have substantial discussions about individual articles on their own talk pages rather than here, so that all editors of those articles can see them and contribute.

Please also note that I prefer conversations to be in one place. I will reply to comments where they are left and, if necessary, transfer comments back to the original talk page where the conversation was initiated.

To leave a new message click here.

Oh come on[edit]

The very first Hillary RM on record is Talk:Hillary_Clinton/Archive_5#Requested_move, filed by you back in 2007. It managed to get one support besides you and ten opposes. Back then I think the style was to close with 'No consensus to move' regardless of the level of support, whereas later 'no consensus' meant something close and/or complicated. But if ever there was an RM where there was indeed "consensus" on what the right title should be, this is it. Yeah, we're both involved parties like you say, but how else would you interpret this one? Wasted Time R (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Eh, never mind, this was too worked up on my part. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
In that case I'll not comment on substance and all I'll say is that my memory of those days is different. Ever since becoming an admin back in 2005 it's been my understanding that "no consensus" should never be used when it's a clear "keep" or "not moved" and that's not something that's only developed since. Timrollpickering (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Oriya->Odia[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Oriya_language#Requested_move_17_June_2015. Thanks. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 21:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost[edit]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (gossip) @ 15:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll[edit]

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion on the deprecation of Template:English variant notice. Since you've had some involvement with the English variant notice template, you might want to participate in the discussion if you have not already done so.Godsy(TALKCONT) 07:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 August 3#Category:1968 US Open Series[edit]

Regarding [1], {{Year by category}} has an odd feature: If subcat is omitted or empty then the main category for the year is automatically added instead, in this case Category:1968. I avoided that by stuffing another existing cat in there in [2] (my edit summary should have said Category:1968 instead of just 1968). I also removed the existing explicit listing of that category although it doesn't matter whether the category is added once or twice. I have done the same for all years 1969 [3] to 2003 so those years at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual#Other should be ready for category deletion (I'm an admin but not used to processing that page). Category:US Open Series by year shows 1969 to 2003 are all empty now. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)