User talk:Tom Radulovich
- 1 Restinga
- 2 temperate rainforests
- 3 Barnstar
- 4 Re: Northern New Guinea lowland rain and freshwater swamp forests
- 5 Rohtas, India
- 6 Baetic Cordillera
- 7 Gahadvala
- 8 DYK for Mizoram-Manipur-Kachin rain forests
- 9 Issues with ecoregions/ecozones
- 10 Malwa (Madhya Pradesh) FAR
- 11 Bhitarkanika Mangroves and Bhitarkanika National Park
- 12 Recent edits on Uttar Pradesh
- 13 Neo-Rationalism (Or Neorationalism) is redirected to Rationalism (architecture)
- 14 You are now a Reviewer
- 15 Barat Daya Islands
- 16 Balaghat District
- 17 Autopatroller
- 18 New Page Patrol survey
- 19 Petén-Veracruz moist forests
- 20 Beni Savanna
- 21 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 22 Thanks from Kottayam
- 23 Afd notice
- 24 Nomination of Tulu Nadu for deletion
- 25 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 26 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hey, Thanks! For creating the Restinga "forest" article; Moving Restinga municipality; Redirecting all linked pages to Restinga, São Paulo. Gcoliveira 06:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Tom, Suzanne here..I am doing a short food web and I chose the temperate rainforest as my biome. I was wondering if you have any more links for good research I could use. Thanks :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
|The Special Barnstar|
|Have a barnstar for your work to the Sierra Madre del Sur article - Pheonix 18:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)|
Re: Northern New Guinea lowland rain and freshwater swamp forests
- Actually I checked it by hand, the problem is sometimes in the brain/hand interface ;) -- lucasbfr talk 02:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look at this article you created and it's talk page, perhaps with an eye towards merging it with Rohtas Fort? The title of the article itself appears to be highly inaccurate, at the least, since it's "actually" located in Pakistan. Pairadox 01:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
A glance over your talk page suggests that you were a bit further west than usual in the Spanish mountains! Earlier this year your article on the Baetic Cordillera was merged with that of Cordillera Bética. I've been tidying it up a little for consistency, but it's not a subject I know well enough (Like not at all - I hadn't heard of the chain before today!) to correct everything. When you have a moment (I can see you're busy!) you might like to return and put right anything where I've screwed up, and perhaps rule on the status of the Aljibe Mountains. --King Hildebrand 13:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
It looks like the current version of Gahadvala has been reworked since when you built it in July 2005 and references have never been provided. Do you have any references you can add to the article? Jeepday (talk) 02:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Mizoram-Manipur-Kachin rain forests
Issues with ecoregions/ecozones
AS you've noticed, I've retrenched the word "ecoregion" in the British Columbia Mainland Coastal Forests ecoregion article (as now fully-capitalized also, as per the cite page's own in-text usage). "Crossover" definitions/titles abound with ecoregion and ecozone articles/categories; some masquerade as landforms, some masquerade as forests, some even masquerade as bodies of water, i.e. if they don't say "ecoregion" in their title, it's not obvious what they are describing and often very misleading. That there are other ecoregino classification systems, and therefore another ecoregion occupying the same spatial references (actually probably more than one ecoregion, as the different systems do not have identical boundaries, of course), makes it all the more necessary to distinguish them in both article and category titles. Just to throw salt in the soup, I'm giong to start Biogeoclimatic zones of British Columbia to make the point that whether it's the WWF ecoregions or the CEC/EnvironmentCanada/EPA ecoregions ,there are yet other systems. This article was not about the forests, but about the ecoregion, so I titled it accordingly (as should ahve been the case from the start). Landforms are not ecoregions and vice versa.....and noe person's ecoregion is another's biogeoclimatic zone (is a vintern's terroir).Skookum1 (talk) 00:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- BTW from what I can see at the Ministry of Forests biogeoclimatic zones map, the coresponding MoF region is Coastal Western Hemlock biogeoclimatic zone, i.e. to the "BC Mainland Forests WWF Ecoregion". "Why can't everybody just get along?" and use the same titles/defitions? POV is why....Skookum1 (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Malwa (Madhya Pradesh) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 02:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
one article u started and other started by someone else seems to overlap in scope and coverage. How would it be to merge all information under Bhitarkanika National Park. thanks for your opinion. --Docku: What's up? 03:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Recent edits on Uttar Pradesh
Recently few Users have massively revamped Uttar Pradesh article. Although any positive edits are welcomed but large scale revisions and revamps are advised to be done after discussion and consensus especially on articles of priority. As you have been a contributor on this article you are invited to participate in discussions on talk:Uttar Pradesh
Neo-Rationalism (Or Neorationalism) is redirected to Rationalism (architecture)
Hey there. May I ask for the reason of the above redirect? I had a look at some sources such as:  and  and they do not seem to say the same things as the article on Wikipedia. Now I am no expert in this topic so maybe I am missing something but I thought I will check with you to be sure. Kind regards. :) Calaka (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
Barat Daya Islands
There is a discussion going on on Talk:Barat Daya Islands about which islands are part of the Barat Daya Islands and which are not. Since you are the one who started the article back in 2004, I was wondering if you might be able to help. --Tjibbe I (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
In 2006 you did some work on Balaghat District. I am using AWB to make some changes to some articles. If I see one that needs further loving care I make some additional edits by hand. As you will be aware since 2006 inline citations have become much more commonly used, please see Talk:Balaghat District#Inline citations. I would appreciate it if you could look over my edits to the article and see if they are correct. I do not have the page on my watch list and probably won't be back to look at it. So if you need to contact me please use my talk page. -- PBS (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, but my main reason for asking is that I have no access to Hunter, and if you still do you could check that the change I made were correct. -- PBS (talk) 05:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tom Radulovich, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature should have little to no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ™ 16:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello Tom Radulovich! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
Petén-Veracruz moist forests
Ran into this because of some fascinating discoveries of very early settlement there over 10,000 years ago. Reliable sources use the name Llanos de Moxos much more commonly, and I think the name should be changed. As you are still active I thought I'd let you know. Dougweller (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou for creating the article Kottayam. Today it has grown to a highly informative article and one of the best city articles in Kerala and India. Keep on the support.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulu Nadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PageImp (talk) 19:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)