User talk:Tomica/Archive 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

Hey

I've done your comments on the FLC. AaronYou Da One 16:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Helllllo? AaronYou Da One 17:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oooops. Sorry I will check them. — Tomica (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low C♯ (musical note)   Readership: High Quality: Low Redemption Song
Readership: Low Quality: Low Penticton Herald   Readership: High Quality: Low Ester Dean
Readership: High Quality: Low So Undercover   Readership: High Quality: Low The Pursuit (album)
Readership: High Quality: Low IFPI Denmark   Merge
Readership: High Quality: Low A Jagged Era   Readership: High Quality: Low Young Money Entertainment
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Algy Clark   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Sweet December (song)
Readership: High Quality: Low DJ Ammo   Readership: High Quality: Low John, I'm Only Dancing (Again)
Readership: High Quality: Low WWE Vintage Collection   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low Grillz   Readership: High Quality: Medium Sean Kingston
Readership: High Quality: Low Doug Boehm   Readership: High Quality: Low Elle Varner
Readership: Low Quality: Low The Queen of Starting Over   Readership: High Quality: Low Rihanna: Live in Concert Tour
Readership: High Quality: Low Blackout Movement   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low E♭ (musical note)   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Geoff Norcott
Readership: High Quality: Low England national futsal team   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Alamohan Das
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Friend Like That   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Fundación Chile
Readership: High Quality: Low Get on the Bus (song)   Expand
Readership: Low Quality: Low Sleepwalking (Maria Lawson song)   Readership: High Quality: Medium Franklin Richards
Readership: High Quality: Low The Flame (Cheap Trick song)   Readership: High Quality: Low Let It Go (Brit & Alex song)
Readership: High Quality: Low Mark Wright (television personality)   Readership: Medium Quality: Low You're Not Alone (The Enemy song)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Unfaithful FAC

Hello. I wouldn't mind reviewing the article, although I would probably be delayed in doing so as I have a lot of other review work piled up. Auree 22:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BEA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

About a Girl

Hey:) were you intending on doing the review anytime soon? I'm probably going to finish Ugly as well so yeah. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I will start, soon, very soon. Sorry, I was busy. — Tomica (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I addressed those issues on the page, don't think they're all of them though. I also finished Ugly and it's up at WP:GAN :). Till I Go Home (talk)
I am continuing the review right away ! :) ... Do you like the Sugababes so much?:) — Tomica (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hahaha, I ♥ Sugababes:). Till I Go Home (talk)
To be honest I never listened to them. I like their name though :)! — Tomica (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Oh lol. Well they're quite big in Europe so maybe you heard at least one song of theirs. Till I Go Home (talk)
Yeah, I know their name. Right they were big. And maybe probably I heard some song on the radio :P !— Tomica (talk) 11:20, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
It was probably this, haha. Till I Go Home (talk)

Stop reverting me.

now. AaronYou Da One 15:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I am and I will. Because the template shouldn't look like that. And I am not the only who shares that opinion. — Tomica (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
You and one other. It works for other singer's, so it works here. The standalone Rihanna template isn't even used on many Rihanna articles. AaronYou Da One 15:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Well as I can see you are alone. The Rihanna templates its use on all the articles that are placed in it. Singles the same. So I don't see the reason for changing it. You mentioned Lady Gaga articles; they don't use the template you just created. They use a simple template because Lady Gaga has much smaller number of singles than Rihanna. When her single number raises, separate templates will be created. Its the same as Beyonce, Madonna, Eminem and everybody. So don't change it. — Tomica (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
You wanted to create the same one last year. And you are presenting a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Just because you and one other doesn't it like, doesn't mean you are right. Yeah I did mention Lady Gaga, and I also said that hers is 'similar, not the same. AaronYou Da One 15:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
I know. But that was a year ago, I have changed my opinions for some Wiki stuff for God sake. Calvin, there were a lot of people who didn't like my idea. This is I don't like it, it is not right. I don't see the reason for creating one HUGE template. Rihanna is widely know artist who releases a lot of singles and albums. That kind of huge template it doesn't fit right. — Tomica (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
"there were a lot of people who didn't like my idea" - doesn't look like people had much of a problem on the talk page. Katy Perry has exactly the same one and it works fine. The Rihanna template has no place, it's small as has links to articles which do not exist. AaronYou Da One 15:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
The only link that redirects is Roc The Block Tour. So there are not a lot, its just one. Katy Perry has two studio albums (one which is not counting for unknown reason) and that template could be applied. Here is something different. Rihanna has 6 studio albums and more thatn 30 singles. I mean I opened the HUGE template and to be honest there was a mash-up in my head. Sorry again, but I am reverting it. — Tomica (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
GGGB and Rated R remix compilation links also redirected. A mash-up in your head is not a valid reason. AaronYou Da One 15:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
They redirect on their sister articles so I don't see problem with that. Mhm, you are right mash-up is not, but {{Madonna}}/{{Madonna singles}}, {{Beyoncé Knowles}}/{{Beyoncé Knowles singles}} or {{Eminem}}/{{Eminem singles}}. They together with Rihanna are aritsts who have released more than 3 studio albums and as of that result has separate templates here. — Tomica (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
It's more functional to have it in one template. Why are two needed? The standalone Rihanna one was not needed. It contained next to no information. AaronYou Da One 15:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
All in all its very untidy. We use two, one for the singles, one for the albums, this one is huge and so untidy. — Tomica (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Oh c'mon, it's not untidy at all. AaronYou Da One 15:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh Calvin. Yeah it is. A lot of untidiness. Why just don't leave it as it was? I don't see problem with that. I have given you a lot of examples. Or maybe put a voting on the talk page between those two versions? — Tomica (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
It's not untidy at all. I don't think you understand what untidy means, because that template is not. AaronYou Da One 16:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Haahaha. Now I don't know basic English. Bravoo. By untidy I mean the second point. — Tomica (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
The template is not untidy. AaronYou Da One 16:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

My two cents

Let me welcome myself. Lol. I don't like to see you two fighting. :( Please don't do this. Listen, I think one template is more than enough for Rihanna. As far I know, she has many singles and albums but that's all. She has a limited number of films (2), live album (1), no EP, no video album, one perfume, no soundtracks, no major articles related to her (other topics) - which is NOT the case for Beyonce, Eminem and Madonna. Rihanna may have xxx number of albums and singles but we all know that it can fit very well in an all-in-one template. Music is what makes her notable. She does not have an established image as a songwriter (for her own albums or others' albums), live performer, actress, etc. All this to say that in my opinion, she should receive the same treatment as Katy Perry. Please, don't get angry at me. I am only stating my opinion with good reasons (I believe). Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome on my page always, since you are the best friend here (for me of course). Even though I respect you a lot, I can't agree with you here. Rihanna has a video album, has a perfume, Rihanna has a book and + two films in which she is feature, that's enough for having two templates, Rihanna and Rihanna singles. — Tomica (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Aww thanks my little Tommy. :D Listen, I never denied those (a video album, has a perfume, ... two films) but I did mention the 'quantity is an issue. It does not look good to have a template for one of this, one of that, one of the other, two of those, etc. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry again, I don't agree. The template look just alright. Please have a look how this is untidy and head mash-up. Really, but really I have a mash-up when I see it and its untidy.Tomica (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

GA barnstar.png The Good Article Barnstar
Thanks 1111tomica for helping to promote Hate That I Love You to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, thank you very much my friend :D ! — Tomica (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm?

What happened here? Looks dangerous. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I would say that this IP is playing with fire. I don't know why is removing the chart. I reverted him for second time (some user did it before me), but he continued. O gosh... — Tomica (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The article used to get vandalized a lot before it was completely re-written back in July. Ah, good times. Things are blue these days. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
OMG. The article was horrible. I remember it. When you completely re-wrote I was so happy and gave you a barnstar. I mean, you have made a masterpiece, since then. — Tomica (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Enough with the complements Tomica! "Rehab" speaks for itself. :-) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I know you think that I am biasing you, but that's not true. :) And why didn't you like the "WFL" performance? Vocally, the style of it? I really like the whole performance called "Rihanna and Coldplay" :D ! — Tomica (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I liked the duet with Chris Martin, but I hated her hair and I just don't like the song. Sorry. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 00:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Okay. Vocally the performance was great. For all the haters that hate her :D haha. And Coldplay were awesome, never listened to them actively, but I think I will start! — Tomica (talk) 10:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Her singing was meh: not awful but not Grammy-live-performance amazing, sorry! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 20:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
She is not like Adele vocally, but I love her more than anyone and her voice is my passion (lol, this sound like poetry) :D ! — Tomica (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
That's OK. Not everyone likes the same music. :) The acoustic intro to WFL at the Grammys was actually good. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 02:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Definitely. I respect all the music tastes and people who listen to them. The intro was incredible, it really showed her vocals. For example opposite of her, Chris Brown had some really good moves, but vocally, he was lip-syncing nearly the whole all the performance. — Tomica (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment on my proposed changes?

Hi. I had a disagreement with User:Journalist on changes I made to 21 (Adele album). I'd appreciate if I could get some comments to the talk page post opened, where I'm at step zero and proposing the changes. Comment? Dan56 (talk) 05:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:About a Girl (Sugababes song)

According to the history at Talk:About a Girl (Sugababes song), you passed the song without completing the procedures at WP:GAC. Could you please do so.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tony. Don't understand? What specifically ? — Tomica (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Love the Way You Lie

An obvious IP-hopping vandal. (Mind you, I'm not saying the IP hopping is on purpose.) I've issued this one an "only warning". If they do it again, you can report at WP:AIV immediately. They were 173.170.175.158 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS), of course, which got blocked and did it once more. If this continues, please ask for semi-protection, and let's hope that they tire of it. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Drmies. I hope this IP wouldn't be blocked. However, If he continues using his hard attitude he could be. — Tomica (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited All of the Lights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monster (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Got 2 Be Down   Readership: High Quality: Low Idolator (website)
Readership: High Quality: Low Mark Stent   Readership: High Quality: Low Wild Young Hearts
Readership: High Quality: Low Feel It (The Tamperer featuring Maya song)   Readership: High Quality: High It Won't Be Soon Before Long
Readership: High Quality: Low Buzz Media   Merge
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Sándor Egeresi   Readership: High Quality: Low Uetsu Main Line
Readership: High Quality: Low Amity Business School   Readership: High Quality: Low Here Ye, Hear Ye
Readership: High Quality: Low Mediolanum Forum   Readership: High Quality: Low Music criticism
Readership: High Quality: Low Kiss You Off   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low Antonio Milošoski   Readership: High Quality: Medium List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones
Readership: High Quality: Low Alright (Kris Kross song)   Readership: High Quality: Low Tina Knowles
Readership: High Quality: Low Ghetto Story   Readership: High Quality: Low Jumpin', Jumpin'
Readership: High Quality: Low The Race (Yello song)   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Get Some (Lykke Li song)   Readership: High Quality: Low David Guetta production discography
Readership: High Quality: Low I Wonder If I Take You Home   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Extended Secondary School
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Jake Wade and the Soul Searchers   Readership: High Quality: Low Conference of Presidents (Greece)
Readership: High Quality: Low Soft Machine (Teddybears album)   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Bésame sin miedo   Readership: High Quality: Low Bridge (music)
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Go Gone   Readership: High Quality: Low Say OK
Readership: High Quality: Low Nobody's Perfect (Hannah Montana song)   Readership: High Quality: High Sugarland

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Loud (Rihanna album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter

Trophy.png

Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was United Kingdom Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions), Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) and Scotland Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 23:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Good

I'm good my friend, though it can always be better! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision: Discussion on the use of navigation templates

Hello,

There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC).

Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Tomica. You have new messages at SD5's talk page.
Message added 21:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SD5 21:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Born_This_Way#Born_This_Way_sales

Could you participate in this discussion sometime? Yeah, it's about the 8-million-thing again. I asked you because I know you aren't a fan of Gaga. :-) I really want to start a discussion instead of engaging in edit-warring and WP:POINTy behaviour. Thanks.

I never had an idea there was a dispute regarding the sales of the album. I will try to read the discussion and say my opinion :) !— Tomica (talk) 22:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I made a big miscalculation then. I hate getting into messes like this. *shame* —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Hehe, don't worry. It can happen to everybody. No matter of that, it's still unconfirmed regarding the 8 million sales. — Tomica (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Lol, I just got my first "warning" ever. It feels funny. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I have had dozens of them. lol, I was a naughty boy. Do you know that I was even blocked once?:) — Tomica (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Do Ya Thang (Rihanna song)

This has been in one of my sandboxes for ages, and you knew this. You've only done it because as part of retaliating against me. AaronYou Da One 11:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, the same as you did with "Drunk on Love (Rihanna song)". It hurts when someone does that stuff right? — Tomica (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
I didn't even know about Drunk on Love. Where does it even say???? Certainly not in your contributions like it does in mine. Besides, Drunk on Love had already had prose created but was under a redirect. I can tell by your response you did it out of spite. And why have you not included my name as the creator in those DYKs??? I am author one, you are author two. I listed the person who originally created Drunk on Love as author one, that's what decent people do. AaronYou Da One 11:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Because you didn't created the articles, but yet re-directed them. For me that's not creating an article. But to show that I am descent person, you can add your name there, you have my permission, even according me, re-directing is not creating an article. And yeah, I am pretty sure you have seen I am working on "Drunk On Love" in a sandbox, so you hurried up. You are very selfish person you know? You should take example of Jivesh collaborating with My love is love on the Beyonce Knowles project. We are two, we should split work equally and no the way that you do. FACE THE FACT! I am here, I collaborate in the project. — Tomica (talk) 11:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Lol, what do you call it then Tomica? Fact is, I created those articles. My name is there as the person who created. You expanded it. Tbh, you should add my name, not me. AaronYou Da One 11:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Yup, ignoring part two of my message. As always. — Tomica (talk) 12:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Because you already know the answer. Everyone knows the answer. I don't like working in twos. AaronYou Da One 12:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
I didn't mean working on every Rihanna article together, but splitting the articles on even. That's the reason for happening this kind of things. 12:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)