User talk:Tpbradbury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Kaelan Joyce[edit]

Thank you for sorting out the Kaelan Joyce article. Very much appreciated!

We tried but could not get the exteranl links part sorted!

Once again Thank you for your time and effort. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.166.200.76 (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Stateless (band)[edit]

Hello, I saw you assesed the Stateless (band) article from Stub class to Start class. I am aware of the criteria being used to asses certain articles, but I would like to know what in particular made you choose for Start class for this article. I actually want to know where I should work on harder or if I'm doing something wrong, or what is needed for this to be a better article. I read all the wikipedia guides and all, but you know, it's not always that easy. My only goal is to contribute to the article and try to only use verifiable sources and facts. I just need to know a little better how to improve this, to let's say a C-class article (1 step at the time!). Thanks! Hans (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

(in response to your answer on my talk) Ok, thanks alot. I'll try to add more content, and when their new album will be released I'm sure lots of new sources to cite will pop up. I'll try to add how they formed (found an article about that) and make a "musical style" section, which seems common for most band articles. And I'm thinking of asking a native English speaker to rewrite most of the text, my English is too average to really make this a better article. But I'll do my best the next couple of months and I'll ask for a new assessment when I think it might be ready for a C-class article. But having a good base structure and already having all the facts (verifiably) sourced is a good start for a better article, I believe. Thanks for your time! Hans (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Layout of Neanderthal references[edit]

Mr. Bradbury, I see that you have just done a major cleanup of the markup structures in the Neanderthal article. The Neanderthal article is the kind of article that I love to read in Wikipedia, and so I really appreciate your work. I have a question regarding the ordering of the References section citations. In all other wikipedia articles I have read (maybe 50), references (as opposed to notes) are sorted in alphabetical order. I find no rhyme or reason in the current References order in the article. What am I missing? (I am a new editor, and seeing that your work displays mastery of wikipedia rules and processes, I feel good about asking you.) Thanks in advance for your answer.Middle Fork (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Got your note, checked the Neanderthal article. Great!! Thanks. Had I been more secure, I would have done it myself when I first noticed the problem. I will be more bold in the future. By the way, I wish the initial editors had not embedded the vast majority of full references in the notes field. Makes it very difficult to quickly scan to make sure the key players in various sub-controversies are being recognized in the article. But when I made that suggestion, it was rejected by someone who, I felt, had developed uncomfortable "ownership" vibes.Middle Fork (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Shama's quote in French Revolution[edit]

Tom, the flame of Reason quote you give from Shama's book Citizens (I presume) is on p. 778 in my 1989 publ. book: yours is on p. 658. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 23:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

You mean that 1989 & 2004 editions have that much page difference, my 778 is your 658? Total pages in my book, incl. sources/bibliography/index, is 950. FW/ Frania W. (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. Well my (counted) 950 page book is the one given as 948: the 1989 edition. So everything's in order. I was just reading what had been done to the French Revolution today & am glad you do not make mistakes! Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Assessment of David Berkeley[edit]

Hi Tom. Thank you for your assessment on the David Berkeley article and for the formatting of the reflist. If you have time, do you have any advice on how I could further improve the article? Thank you. McMarcoP (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Tom, thank you for your suggestions. The point is, I am not able to find any negative review of Berkeley's work, at least online. I am sure that there are some, though, and I will keep looking. Also - I will try to add some image, maybe a scan of an album cover. I am constantly expanding it, every time that there is some update anyway (the ATL group is yesterday's news - literally) and will keep doing so. Thank you very much! McMarcoP (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Sharon Kay Penman[edit]

Hi. Yesterday you rated the Sharon Kay Penman article that I took from a stub. Today the rating was changed to a C because of the skimpy lead. I've reworked the lead. If you get a chance, do you mind swinging by and having a look? Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the very speedy reaction and the extra set of eyes to fix the mistakes. I'm fairly certain it is Richard the Lionheart but will spend some time verifying. Thanks again. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Nicholas Mayall FAC[edit]

Hello Tpbradbury,

I'd love to get your copy edit help on the FAC for the astronomer Nicholas Mayall. If you have some time, please come take a look and make any improvements you can.

WilliamKF (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for you support. WilliamKF (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Yo Ho ho[edit]

Hi Tom, see you at the Oak in Jan? ϢereSpielChequers 18:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Arius article assessment[edit]

Thanks so much for taking the time to assess the Arius article; I appreciate your imput on it. Just out of curiosity, what kept it from gaining a "B" classification? I've been working trying to improve it of late, and would appreciate hearing your thoughts. Thanks again! - Ecjmartin (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback! I'm going to see what I can do about that, and then maybe nominate it for GA, once we resolve a couple of issues brought up recently by another editor. Thanks again for your imput! - Ecjmartin (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your edit on 2010 Toronto Blue Jays season fixing up refrences. Youre help is noticed and much appriciated. BLUEJAYSFAN32 (TALK|JAYS) 15:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Reflinks[edit]

Hi there. Since Reflinks is working for you and you know how to run it, can you please have a look at

I just put in rawlinks on these FA/FAR renovations as I heard reflinks was instant, botlike. Many thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

I wanted to say thanks for always assessing bio articles when they are requested – you help out much more than I do, so:

Hekerui (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I noticed this too and second the motion. KimChee (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Assessments Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal[edit]

Thank you for the recent assessments of Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal. I appreciate the work that you are doing. For my future reference, could you direct me to the MOS regarding image sizing and formatting of references or citations in articles? I'm finding a bit of inconsistency between individuals assessing articles. I would really like to improve my editing and alignment with the MOS. Could you also provide a link that will let me know how to format the references in the manner that you revised? I haven't the foggiest idea how to do that and I cringe to think that I added work on your part. Any information you could provide that would improve the article is greatly appreciated. Thanks again! ;) Cindamuse (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal[edit]

Thanks for the feedback on the assessments of Anthony Ashley-Cooper and Elaine Hamilton-O'Neal at my talk page. Images, refs, what not. I'm definitely going to start using the reflinks bot for citations. I agree with the assessments. Although, I didn't expect the B assessment on AAC. I guess it was better than I thought. I had the biggest trouble finding any photos of Hamilton or her work that I could use. Doesn't lend much to an interesting article of an artist, in my opinion, but I did what I could. Thanks again. I appreciate the work that you are doing. Cindamuse (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy Tpbradbury's Day![edit]

Featured article star.svg

Tpbradbury has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
so I've officially declared today as Tpbradbury's Day!
For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian,
enjoy being the star of the day, Tpbradbury!

Signed, Neutralhomer

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...NeutralhomerTalk • 04:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hi Tom, thanks for taking the time to assess Tim Christensen and Dizzy Mizz Lizzy, and making a few useful improvements. I'm happy Wikipedia has such good volunteers like yourself! Best wishes, Eddyspeeder (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

And obviously, it's about time you got another cake! Eddyspeeder (talk) 21:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Archpoet's assessment and edits[edit]

Thanks a bunch for rating the article Archpoet and making most-welcome fixes! If you have some time, I'd love to hear your thoughts and suggestions on how to make it even better. I really want it to reach B, A, and even GA status soon enough, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!
• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ {KLAT} • 09:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Danke schön for the suggestions. I'll get working a little harder!
• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ {KLAT} • 18:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Ronnie Lee Gardner[edit]

Thank you for helping out. This is my first FA nomination, so I am admittedly a bit intimidated. KimChee (talk) 04:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

CleanupBarnstar.PNG The Cleanup Barnstar
For your assistance in improving Ronnie Lee Gardner from its humble roots. KimChee (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token a2377dcd08797d8c1b3fa41349ea011a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia![edit]

Dear Tom, Frania de Lutèce, who can't stand whisky but adores champagne, would like to know what exactly you mean by the sources needed for the image Napoléon adieux à la garde impériale à Fontainebleau.[1]

Thank you![edit]

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For following behind us amateurs and giving Wikipedia a polished look with good-looking footnotes, I award you this Citation Barnstar. HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I want you to know how much I appreciate edits like this. I don't understand how to do that sort of stuff, and I don't have any interest in learning how, either, but I sure am glad there's people like you who add the professional look to this encyclopedia. Thank you! HuskyHuskie (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Orologio verde.svg
This user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Tpbradbury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
212.137.36.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Qualitytea". The reason given for Qualitytea's block is: "Block evasion".


Accept reason:

Done. You weren't the block target. :P Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Unblock[edit]

Orologio verde.svg
This user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Tpbradbury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
212.137.36.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hectorthebat". The reason given for Hectorthebat's block is: "Repeating behaviour that led to previous block".


Accept reason:

This should be fixed, but please post if again if it is not. TNXMan 14:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Are you sure you haven't made some sort of mistake? I can find no evidence that the autoblock you specify exists. Also, Hectorthebat's block dates from 11 March, and autoblocks normally last only for 24 hours. Try editing again. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
i've tried editing two different articles again and i've got the same error message Tom B (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Thanks for taking time to through the criteria of the Le souper de Beaucaire article, much appreciated! Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 11:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review for Ludwig Wittgenstein[edit]

Hello! I have reviewed this article; you can see the review at Talk:Ludwig Wittgenstein/GA1. Please don't be offended that I closed the review without allowing time for improvements - I only did that because, once improvements are made, I would like to redo the review from scratch in order to make sure that this excellent article gets all the attention it deserves. Thank you for working on it, and happy editing! --Cerebellum (talk) 11:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Wow, good job! Thank you for your prompt response. I still think it would be nice to have a "Reception" or "Legacy" section though - what do you think? --Cerebellum (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thanks...[edit]

Just to drop you a quick note of thanks for clearing up my ref error on the hawking page, I was interrupted at home and didn't realised the mistake - blushing now... Failedwizard (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Some falafel for you![edit]

Falafel award.png Mmm... falafel... :D Thanks for your help on Philosophy and for previous contributions you've made! Matt (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

An award for you[edit]

A Barnstar!
Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.142 (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey! - ur contribs 2 WP...[edit]

hv bn noticed @ Yahoo News: LINK (in a bar graph showing the monikers of the users with the most edits during the U.S. Pres. Primaries so far to the Wiki blp pertaining to a Republican party candidate).--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

.....Lollol!!!

Hey, u think their graphic's set to update itself automatically, as more edits r made?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Yeah - spose not--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Wikipedia Autopatrol.svg

Hi Tpbradbury, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:TdF[edit]

I'll take the running man for it; after all, it was what Sagan did on stage 3 at the race...although that seems so long ago now. Haha. But many thanks! Craig(talk) 23:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely; he is nearly there...but it isn't over until that final lap in Paris. One little incident like the one on stage 6...on a straight bit of road...and then they could be on the back foot. Flat tyres in the time trial...and let's not mention any more tacks...but for team performances, Sky have absolutely nailed it, despite losing Sivtsov early on...one less hand in the mountains but they've blown the rest of the field out of France. No wonder that they have 34 victories, excluding national championships, this season. Dominance. Craig(talk) 23:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
A small token of our appreciation for you taking the time to respond to our questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot, thanks so much! Nettrom (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA[edit]

Uffizi Florence Wrestlers 1.png Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you haven't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page.

Kevlar (talk) 05:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

The Winter Walk at Anglesey Abbey - geograph.org.uk - 862583.jpg Best wishes for the New Year!
Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013!

Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year.

Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians!

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision 531166099[edit]

What white space error are you talking about? I see none in the prior revision. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

thx for your message. you can see harry reid and dick durbin are combined in one frame. however for the house of rep pictures, there was space to the right of the individual images rather than them being in pairs, the frames didn't seem to resize automatically Tom B (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Napoleon (estimated annual readership: 2,777,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Napoleon to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Invention[edit]

Pod lípou návrhovou cs znak.svg
Hello, Tpbradbury.

You are invited to join WikiProject Invention, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of inventions and invention-related topics.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mia Frye[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year Tpbradbury![edit]

The Beatles Invite[edit]

AbbeyRoadZebraCrossingRevisited.jpg Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!

Hi, in response to your thanks your welcome. I'd also like to add that I can't wait to see your excellent and well-appreciated work used on Beatles articles. All the best wishes and kind regards Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Awarded to Tpbardbury.

For his particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, always remember that your hard work is seen and appreciated.
Regards,
Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

A Little Help Here....[edit]

Hey Tpbradbury, I was wondering if you'd be able to help me promote "Alexander O'Neal" to at least GA, I've created like four or five articles for his albums some minor work on his actual page etc. and I was wondering if you'd like to help. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Hey, Tpbradbury thanks for your contributions to Alexander O'Neal, I may be asking as lot but could you please help me with the article Bruce Foxton. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Film categories[edit]

Hi there. I just wanted to leave a note that we don't use alphabetical order in film categories. Instead, we use a system described in WP:FILMCAT so that people can easily see the most important ones first. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Napoleon[edit]

Hello I read one of your edits on Napoleon Bonaparte that convinced me that the article is to big and that it should be around 10,000 words not 17,000. I feel specially the battles are to much mentioned in details. Today I removed a lot of unnecessary repetitive information's only to see myself revert by one editor. I opened a debate on the talk page and I believe your input could be very important. I believe in consensus and collaboration and didn't want to make further changes until this issue is debated and decided by many editors.Thank you.Aubmn (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Clint Boon[edit]

Could you please help me with the article, Clint Boon. Thanking you in advance Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I'd also be grateful if you could help with the article, Tom Bailey. Once again, thanking you in advance Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't usually ask you to help with football biographies but could you please help me with the article, David Lucas. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

I hate to feel that I'm asking for too much, while giving so little (though I am). However, could you please give your undivided attention to the article, The Style Council. All the best, for being the best Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

A lot more than a little help with the article Rochdale would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, a lot more than a little help with the article Stockport County would sure be appreciated partner. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Could you please me with the article Niall Hone. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, maybe a little help with the article Philipp Tschauner. It seems to be poorly translated from German. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Every Sperm Is Sacred and Galaxy Song? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Me again! (sigh), if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the articles Mark Mothersbaugh and Devo. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I've ran out of conversation openers, so could you please help me with the article Josh Mancell, thanks. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I asked you to help with this article (Josh Mancell), because I was talking to him not long ago and he seems like a real nice dude, he even said he'll post out his autograph out to me at the end of this week too! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

If you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Mim Grey. Thanks! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article John Perry. And remember that I always highly appreciate your edits :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Again, if you've got any spare time, could you please help me with the article Andy Pratt. Blessings always :) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
You know that you deserve this... So take it!. And with it know that someone out there, like myself, really do appreciate your fine edits. 'Stay Up' & Keep Rocking. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Bots[edit]

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Waterloo[edit]

If you make changes to a page as you did here then please do not alter things that affect an established style by inserting spaces into section headers when the majority of headers did not contain them.

Please do not alter the start of citation templates such as {{Cite Nuttall}} to {{cite Nuttall}} when the citation templates before and after it start with capital letters.

In the case of an article title such as London Gazette Extraordinary please do not change it to London Gazette Extraordinary it was done like that for stylistic reasons. Likewise unlike with a "s" at the end of a link which appears a blue "'s" does not so [[Hugh Halkett|Hugh Halkett's]] and [[Hugh Halkett]]'s appear differently "Hugh Halkett's" "Hugh Halkett's" and I think that the "apostrophe s" looks better in blue. -- PBS (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015[edit]

Help with AIFMD?[edit]

Hi there Tpbradbury! I'm looking for editors to help me improve the article for the AIFMD European financial directive. I saw you had recently edited the homepage for WP:ECON, and noticed you had economics listed on your user page. I thought I'd reach out to you, since this article might be of interest to you. I'm looking at this page as a consultant for the Managed Funds Association; due to my financial COI, I won't be making edits to the article directly, and I'd instead like to discuss my proposed changes with interested editors. Could you take a look at the latest draft I've put together? You can read it and tell me what you think here. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 15:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
43 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Tuna fish sandwich (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
32 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Republic of Serbia (1992–2006) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
50 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start King-Emperor (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Map of Salvation (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
562 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Breakup of Yugoslavia (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
417 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Serbia and Montenegro (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
83 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B North Ossetia-Alania (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
314 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Economy of South Africa (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
45 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Ibrahim Rugova (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
89 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Greater Serbia (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
28 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Crop wild relative (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
766 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Cumin (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Demographics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
298 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Iranian cuisine (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Phone Losers of America (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
177 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Pillow (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
787 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bamboo (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
14 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Constitution of Kosovo (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
53 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B History of Montenegro (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Dredge drag head (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
73 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Aquaculture of tilapia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
26 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Global Food Security Index (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Start Květa Peschke career statistics (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
8 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Sweet potato storage (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 2.0 Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Euthynnus lineatus (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
23 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Syzygium aqueum (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Know the Ledge (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alcée Louis la Branche (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Dragiša Pešić (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Dysphania botrys (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)