User talk:Trezatium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

/Archive 1

Comment from User:[edit]

I am a wikipedia neophyte. There is no question about that. I was however very concerned when I noticed that the main article didn't have much if anything to say about homosexuality and aids. Today I noticed that a user named "chicken wing" is proposing a change to the main article that would address these concerns. I also noticed that he is being taken seriously by at least 2 wikipedia pundits.

It is my contention that if people such as "chicken wing" had easy access to the Michael Fumento page they would find the task of convincing the aforementioned pundits that there is in fact ample evidence to support the notion that their is a strong correlation between homosexuality and aids. Mr Fumento has been arguing that very argument for years. Perhaps the time has come to email Mr Fumento himself and ask him to reveal his sources. But as you may know the Gay Community is often strongly at variance with any notion that might serve to undermined there agenda for more funding. 08:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your concerns. I have posted a reply to your comment on the AIDS talk page. It would be helpful if you would confirm whether or not you (User: are the same as User:Randy Bugger. Thanks. Trezatium 19:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

It was me alright but I thought that I was signed in, SORRY about that. I am a slow typer. I got an error message telling me to try logging out and signing back in. In retrospect it is probably best to bracket the subject of Aids funding and the Gay Community . I have a lot of respect for them,Randy Bugger 12:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. No need to apologise. Trezatium 19:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


Do you think that a chart and or section on aids funding since its onset is a good idea. It is pertinent to the main article and I am surprised that one does not exist already. I think it should be done with discretion. It would also help negate any reasonable objection(s) from aids dissidents. Randy Bugger 11:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I have no strong opinions on this (generally I don't do much editing to the main AIDS article). I suggest you start a discussion on the AIDS talk page. Trezatium 09:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

AKA Randy Bugger[edit]

Hello my real name is Moses Weintraub. The user name Randy Bugger has been put to rest due to potential breach of Wikipedias user name policy. Moses Weintraub 10:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Feedback on NPOV[edit]

Hi - just wanted to let you know that another editor, on Duesberg hypothesis, criticized the article because the article merely contains an "abundance of references to how other people think it's wrong" (rather than my personal refutation). I can't think of a better (albeit inadvertent) endorsement of its progress toward satisfying WP:NPOV, so thought I'd share it. MastCell Talk 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added a comment to the discussion. Trezatium 09:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

FLRC listing[edit]

I've listed Wikipedia:Featured_list_removal_candidates#List_of_HIV-positive_people. TONY (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

List of HIV-positive people[edit]

Hi, I updated my sandbox list of people who could be added to the list. See User:Garion96/Sandbox2. If you ever feel bored.... :) Garion96 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

That's for sure, there really were a lot of already done entries on that page. No idea why I did not noticed that before. The list is cleaned up now. Garion96 (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


Nice to see you editing. Hope things are well. MastCell Talk 00:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

New section[edit]

Please explain what the inclusion of a funding "chart" has to do with an objective reassessment of "HIV" as the causative agent of Aids. If anything it will support dissidents. The "HIV" industry is a capitalist enterprise which funds monopoly pharmaceuticals and their public relations bodies of State Monopoly Capitalism the CDC, NIH and WHO which are all capitalist institutions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Just wanted to say that it's nice to see you're still editing. You were always a pleasure to interact with, and I hope things are going well. As you can see from this thread, nothing much has changed, so I hope you still have your tinfoil hat laying around... :) MastCell Talk 01:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Trezatium. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)