User talk:Trident13/archive2011

L&HR history

I thought the Fairburns both belonged to the Mahers, one each to Austin & Charlie?

Is there any citation for the (quite ludicrous, even in the mid-70s) "scheme" to reconnect through Greenodd?

Is it time we had a category of "British railway preservationists" (ideas?) for articles like your (most welcome) Peter Beet, Eric Treacy et al.? Andy Dingley (talk) 03:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, hope this finds you well! I thought that as well re the Fairburns, but this pdf (Googlised quick-cache version) from an official GCR press-release for 42085 suggests otherwise. Yes, I think there is a need for a category along the lines of British steam preservationaists: perhaps start as a list? Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 03:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Bickershaw

You might be interested in this. [1] Page 4. I'm very interested in coalmines and the Leigh area , I hope you don't mind me interfering.--J3Mrs (talk) 14:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I hope this finds you well! I think "positive interference" is one of the things that you have to accept as an editor around here, and its particularly welcome when you find someone who has interest in a subject and knowledge of an area. I will make a read of that ref later, must get and do some work now! By the way, there are clearly other collieries in the area, but as this one was the last to close, there is much better information and nice pics in commons for it. If I have a crack at some others, would you be willing to bring some further knowledge? Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm having a crack at the Manchester Collieries, Westleigh is on the Wigan coalfield but I'm sure I can "interfere" when I can. Nice to find someone else interested in coal. I think I know where I can find some refs. --J3Mrs (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Mardy Colliery

Hi. Just wondering how serious you are about "in 1873 Mordecai Jones from Brecon and now residing in Nantmelyn. . ." That makes him about 137 years old :) Your source gives the year as 1874 in one place, and 1873 in another. Wikipedia has Crawshay Bailey dying in 1872. What's going on here, old son? Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 10:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello Brian, pleased to make your acquaintance - I hope that this finds you well! I think (happy to be corrected) that the timeline works on this one as follows: Crawshay Bailey died in 1872, meaning that the lease takeover of the farm and development of the mine from 1874 seems correct. Secondly, a Mordecai Jones died in 1880 in Wales, aged 67; meaning that the takeover date to Locket's Merthyr Company around 1880 seems about right, and his age is within human bounds. Thoughts? I have adjusted the article to make it clearer as to why Lockett's took over the site. Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Aha! Good. I took the liberty of making this a lease (not sale). Also (in line with similar edits to Blantyre mining disaster), I've capitalised the pit names (because they're proper nouns) and also linked the article to the relevant UK disaster list. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Old Edwardians

Category:Old Edwardians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthias Müller (businessman)

The article Matthias Müller (businessman) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Zachlipton (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Its a copy of the article at German language Wikipedia. Next time, try not to be so quick with the tagging. Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 19:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Transfesa

[2] this edit clearly is in breach of copyright - the material is directly copypasted from the sources. Please do not do this.Sf5xeplus (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Anni Dewani listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anni Dewani. Since you had some involvement with the Anni Dewani redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Wasell^(T) 16:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Chiwawa

    W/ regard to your recent edits of the Dabs Chiwawa and Centre of Excellence, please consider viewing Category:Disambiguation, whose members are pages like

Template:Alsoknown,

Template:Alsoknown/sandbox,

Wikipedia:Disambiguation,

Wikipedia:Disambiguation and abbreviations,

Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts, and

Wikipedia:Hatnote,

but which cannot include any main-namespace pages.
    Dab pages get into their proper :Category:Disambiguation pages via templates -- usually {{Disambig}}.
    Thanks for your many diligent contributions!
--Jerzy•t 18:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Austin

I see you've tried to point Austin to Austin (disambiguation) three times now. If you strongly believe this change needs to be done, you should consider a move request instead of unilateral changes. Cheers, --JaGa^talk 22:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

K1 fund

Please see WP:BLP/N#K1 fund and User talk:AFLawyer. This needs to be thrashed out on the article talk page. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you - comment left on talkpage, think we can solve this one quickly! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I think he has more concerns than just the last para - I've added his points to the talk page. I am off now till tomorrow, will check back then. JohnCD (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Class NG G13 & Class NG G16

Destructive editing – that’s highly encouraging.

(→Gallery: don't need a gallery, we have commons)
If a gallery is not allowed, why is there provision for it? Each of those pictures were put there for a reason, for example to illustrate the different models from different manufacturers described in the text and show different paint schemes. Or is the thousand words preferable? (Incidentally, the combination NG G13/NG G16 “mother” article had a gallery of eight pictures, five of them of the same green locomotive.)

(remove duplication and pointless sections - remove gallery, we have commons - edit for flow)
Duplication of some information between independent articles is inevitable when similar locomotive types are the subject, eg Garratts as in this case. The alternative would be one combined article on all 22 Garratt classes operated by the SAR, which would be huge. Now that would be pointless. Agreed on the “flow” bit.

(→SAR Number Plates: who cares? Put it in a seperate article)
(→Numbering system: totally irrelevant to this article)
I care. And I disagree. I did combine the offending sections and relocated it to the end of the article.

(→Manufacturers: reduce gross over-linking)
Good, that was constructive, thank you. I reduced it some more.

André Kritzinger 01:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Trident13. You have new messages at Andre Kritzinger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Murder of Anni Dewani

Thank you for your contribution to the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Boticca

I saw your note at WP:VP/T, read your comments at the talk page, and was convinced, so I've moved it to mainspace. Nyttend (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank You! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Margaret Price

Regarding this edit: Certainly Dame Margaret was known as a singer, but was she known as a songwriter too? Cheers, mikemorr (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Categories for Scotch Egg and Welsh Rabbit

Kindly do not accuse your fellow-editors of vandalism without good evidence, and kindly do not patronize me with a 'new user' message -- see WP:CIVIL. You had added Category:Scottish cuisine to Scotch egg and Category:Welsh cuisine to Welsh rabbit; I removed those categories, because -- as I explained in the edit summary -- there is nothing in the articles indicating that these dishes are actually Scottish and Welsh, any more than Indian pudding is Category:Indian cuisine or Category:Native American cuisine. You mention reference 2 in the article -- this refers to the OED, which defines Welsh rabbit as "A dish consisting of cheese and a little butter melted and mixed together..." and does not say that it is a Welsh dish (though of course it is called 'Welsh'). Please restore my edits. Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Maerdy Branch

Hi, re this pair of edits -

• where is the source for an 1800 opening date to justify Category:Railway lines opened in 1800? I realise that Railscot states "1800 Rhondda Valley Branches (Taff Vale Railway) Extension to Maerdy opened by buying a private line from Ferndale to Maerdy.", but that is highly suspect - the TVR wasn't incorporated until 21 June 1836, the first section (Cardiff-Abercynon) opening 8 October 1840; the line between Pontypridd and Dinas Rhondda being opened 10 June 1841, so they would hardly have been in a position to buy other undertakings some 40 years earlier.
• how can the GWR have introduced steam railmotors to the line in 1900, when they didn't actually possess any until 1903?
• why would the GWR have operated railmotors on this TVR branch, when the nearest connection to the GWR was at Quakers Yard?

--Redrose64 (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Romanesque revival architecture in England

Category:Romanesque revival architecture in England, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 11:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Reading to Plymouth Line

After several years of discussion the consensus was to split the Reading to Plymouth Line article into three articles - Bristol to Exeter line, Reading to Taunton line, and Exeter to Plymouth line. The split has now been done, though fairly crudely as I am not an expert on the subject. It will need an expert eye to look at it and smooth out the edges. SilkTork *^YES! 15:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Davinia Taylor

Hi there, regarding this edit, when the anonymous editor added the fact to the article, I had checked for sources before removing it, but I wasn't sure whether or not Female First met our reliable sources guideline. Do you know anything that indicates it's a reliable source? To be honest, I don't really doubt that she is pregnant, but we're looking for "verifiability, not truth", and as I'm sure you're aware, BLPs need reliable, good quality sources for such information. I did mention to the IP that it looks like there is an OK article or interview, which would be fine. I don't happen to have a copy of OK myself. I'm not going to revert you, but I am a little concerned about that source. --BelovedFreak 10:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Savile Row

I noticed that you have been working on the Savile row page, and I have a couple of questions. Do you think the amendments that 81.139.94.126 made today are correct. The information removed was relevant and referenced. I am not as experienced as you, should I undo this change?

The other question I have is I noticed that you have removed some tailors that are not on savile row, but are classed in the industry as "Savile Row" tailors. I am specifically referring to Anderson Sheppard, Edward Sexton and Dougy Haywood. They are definitely very relevant to the history of Savile Row and have contributed largely to what it has become? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmontefiore (talk • contribs) 14:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message, and welcome to Wikipedia! The Savile Row article caught my attention in October 2009, when it looked like a piece of spam, and had a peacock tag on it. The problem with the article is that it attracts a lot of interested parties from the tailoring world, and internet pro's working for tailoring houses trying to increase Google rankings and traffic. We also get a fair few fashion students, who don't understand the basic rules here of us being an encyclopedia and not some form of tailoring-ego alter! I don't know your experience in the fashion world or even Savile Row itself, but some interest and experitise is always welcome - happy to help you create something better. If you work for one of the tailors, then please read WP:COI - but you can still edit all the other stuff if a conflict of interest occurs.

The mian "core" of the article now seems better, focused on the main tailoring brands/shops, but the point you make on the other tailors off of Savile Row brings the point of how to balance the geography of the location, with the wider meaning of the name, ie: if they are not on Savile Row itself, how far do we geographically extend the list of tailors? If too far, is there a need for a separate article on Tailoring in London, before the article again becomes a Spam house?

In the case of the edits of 81.139.94.126, there is a main article for Tommy Nutter - also one for Edward Sexton at present. Hence the on-page article focus in that area should be kept to the essentials: when started, what, why were they notable, key dates. Everything else should be placed on the main article for that (tailor) - hence the wikitag is called WP:MAIN.

You have to remember here that much as though there are rules, much as you have done with me, engaging other editors is often a better approach than arguing over what in retrospect could be trivial points. Get consensus, then record that on the articles talkpage so there's a record, then move forward. If I can help you with anything further, please - just ask! With Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your informative answer. I have taken on board what you have said, and set up my user page. I think it is on the right track and represents what I want to do and my experience well, but am open for constructive criticism.

The Savile Row proximity issue, is a difficult one. Is a Savile Row Tailor one who works on Savile Row, or one makes suits to "Savile Row standards"? One should also consider that if a suit is made by a firm on Savile row in a workshop elsewhere in London, or even abroad is it then a "Savile Row suit"? You may well say who cares! The fact is that this is a very grey area and I often hear about people being suits as 'Savile Row suits" or "bespoke suits" and not getting what they expect. There are very few impartial sources clarifying this issue, I feel the nature of a wikipedia article about this would benefit people from outside the trade looking for more information on custom made suits.

While I have been writing this I was thinking about the solution. What do you think about the idea of me and some members of The Savile Row Bespoke Association working together to produce pages for Savile Row Suit and Bespoke Suit, so that the Savile row article can just be about the geographical place and its history?

I plan to prepare in-detail article changes to the TommyNutter and Edward Sexton articles making them more informative and better quality. I will invest some time preparing this and planto show some more experienced users (like yourself if you are interested) before publishing to make sure that I am intending improving the articles. Regards, --Dmontefiore (talk)16:17 23 March 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC).

Trinity Theatre

Nice article. It needs an infobox, but which one to use? {{infobox church}} or {{infobox theatre}}, or both? What do you think? Mjroots (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Think its better to go with the theatre, as that's what it is now - could do both? Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I tried both and don't like the aesthetics. BTW, the building is GradeII* listed, which should be added, along with Category:Grade II* listed buildings in Kent. Mjroots (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Radio people

Hello. Thanks for keeping an eye on John Myers (radio executive) and Scottie McClue. I suspect both articles attract editors affiliated with the subject from time to time. I can honestly declare that I have no affiliation with either, and I strive to be neutral.
I worked on the lead to Myers last night, which you removed this morning? I don't see much wrong with this version: it's a neutral summary of the article, which is what a lead should be! Is it OK to reinstate this? I think that its previous form was problematic, but my improvements made it acceptable.
However, we do need to keep an eye for genuine promotional language and COI. I noticed a lot of "Mr Lamont" creeping in to Scottie McClue. The JPS^{talk to me} 09:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello again. I'm concerned at your edi summary here. The WP:LEAD should summarise the article; content being in the article is not a valid reason for removing it from the lead. I would be interested discuss this with you, rather than engaging in an edit way. If you disagree, perhaps Wikipedia:Third opinion might be a way forward.The JPS^{talk to me} 10:15, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Can I ask first for your relationship to the radio industry/Mr Myers? Like this anon editor, you seem to want to add an overly promotional intro, making it look more like an advert? This article seems prone to overtly promotional text. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Let's take this discussion to Talk:John Myers (radio executive). The JPS^{talk to me} 10:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Old Trafford

To state the obvious, Lancashire play at Old Trafford. But Old Trafford is no longer in Lancashire (just as Edgbaston is no longer in Warwickshire) and our naming convention is that we use current counties. Please either create a very small category for Greater Manchester or leave it as it was. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I was trying to sort out Category:Cricket grounds in England. There are not presently enough cricket ground articles in Greater Manchester - which I know is a "county" - so hence left the Category:Sport in Trafford as well as adding Category:Cricket grounds in Lancashire. Hence, much as though I am aware of the convention of naming, creating a One or Two article category is pointless. I therfore choose the better option, meeting a balance between the differing guidelines. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I am unconvinced. A quick look suggests there are two grounds in Greater Manchester with WP articles. This is not many, obviously, but is a similar number to some other county categories (eg Cumbria which you created recently). Cheshire CCC also play at grounds in Marple and Cheadle, so there is the possibility of more to come. Either way, OT is not in Lancashire. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There must be dozens, even if not well-known outside their immediate localities. For a start, a quick check of the Central Lancashire League shows that most of their 16 current member clubs are based within Greater Manchester - the only exception that I noticed is Walsden. So, 15 grounds to keep old Trafford company. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Rijksmonuments

Hi, just wanted to say thanks! for helping subcategorize the articles in Category:Rijksmonuments. Regards, Jvhertum (talk) 08:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Bybrook River

I reverted your edit as the particluar Folly Farm referred to is very definitely in South Gloucestershire, as you would see if you read the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment, but why did you then in this edit link it to Folly Farm located in Somerset? To create a disambiguation page today, I have now moved that article to Folly Farm, Somerset, and hence why I moved your incorrectly inserted link also. Can I suggest that you insert correct information in the information box, such as a Folly Farm, Gloucestershire article, than ranting at someone who merely multipled your original mistake. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

As a fellow contributor (alc59) to the Bybrook River article, you (Trident13) have my whole hearted support on this. Corrections are fine, but they do not need to be overlaid with ill-judged and unnecessarily aggressive negative comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alc59 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Looking into this further, it appears the the Rivers infobox automatically links the source to a WP artcile is one of that name exists, which is why all of this arose. I shall look into this further and see if this can be fixed. Cheers. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Villages in Somerset

Could I ask for some help or comments on Category:Villages in Somerset. Over the last few days, inspired your work and that of others, the 400+ articles in this category have been moved into the relevant sub categories ie: Category:Villages in Bath and North East Somerset, Category:Villages in Mendip, Category:Villages in North Somerset, Category:Villages in Sedgemoor, Category:Villages in South Somerset, Category:Villages in Taunton Deane and Category:Villages in West Somerset. There are still 9 articles in the parent cat, most of which are either parishes containing one or more villages or suburbs of larger towns and I am unsure whether village in X applies. The others are Bruton which says town rather than village in the article, so I am unsure and Northover which covers more than 1 village!. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somerset#Category:Villages in Somerset if you had any advice.— Rod ^talk 20:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Post-war prefab houses

This is my first time of updating a Wikipedia entry and am at a loss of how to continue......I have read the rules and the specific articles that you directed me to, but still do not know how to proceed.

I notice that you are one of the top 400 people who update Wikipedia and would therefore appreciate your guidance, rather than just undo your removal again.

I lived in the prefabs on Wanstead flats from 1947-1959, so the topic is of particular interest to me.

Your original article is extremely good at describing the prefabs themselves and their history, but makes no reference to the social history for the people who lived there which is what I am trying to add to this article, referencing studies performed and published by other sources (including an existing Wikipedia reference to the Young and Willmott study in 1957).

What am I missing here to get this aspect added to your original article........??

By the way.......I have some photos, if you are interested, of the prefabs we lived in and have no idea what model of prefab they are........ is there some way I can send them to you, for you to identify what model they are.......??

Help with this would be much appreciated........

Thankyou.......Colin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin 68dots (talk • contribs) 09:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Colin, I hope that this finds you well! Lets see if I can help you out and educate you here! First things first, read the welcome notes that I placed on your page - it will give you a far better idea of what the base rules, but simply all are welcome. Yes, you can muck up an article, but its easy to revert!

The easiest place to learn is in a stub page, and its also a place where you can create an article and drag stuff in/take as much time as you want to create something, before others - yes, like me - come long and critic/edit it. I have created you a personal stubs page here. On that page you will find three further pages:

• • a play page to litterally play!
  • A copy of the existing in production British post-war temporary prefab houses
  • A copy of your last editted version of British post-war temporary prefab houses

Now, you can play around and edit these as much as you want, the only thing I have done is remove the categories by removing the first [[ from them - so they are not indexed!

I think there is something in your edits. I create the original article as a collection point for all things prefab - took me nearly three months to create the thing - but your piece to me seemd to skim across a number of issues:

• • Post War British society
  • British society and its changes post war
  • British working communities and their relationships
  • The relationship between community and architecture

I'd like to help you create your first article, which I think your edits suggest is easily capable. The question now is what is it about, and does it stand on its own or within something else? I sugget that you go have an edit or two on either the existing stubs I have created for you, or create your own new stub and have a think. Happy to help, much as though my drive towards the subject was from an architectural direction, buildings only existing for and within a society.

Re your pictures, don't upload those yet! There are licensing issues associated with pictures which are a fun issue in themselves, and also you need to recognise once loaded they are free-licensed so that anyone can use them. Many points of debate there, but get the text context right first, and then we can address that:

I now have your talkpage in my watchlist, so you can come back and comment here, or on your own talkpage. Glad to have you on board, lets get that first article into production. With Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

James Ross (Canadian businessman)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of James Ross (Canadian businessman), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/QuebecHistory/encyclopedia/JamesRoss.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Glamorgan buildings

Noticed some of your category tidying through my watchlist and didn't want to step on your toes, so thought I'd check first. Are you, like me, of the view that Category:Buildings and structures in Glamorgan and its subcategories should be deprecated in favour of categorisation by existing Welsh counties? Category:Buildings and structures in Wales by county, after all, does not seem to be based on historic / ceremonial counties, hence the use of Bridgend / Conwy county boroughs etc rather than their historic predecessors. Glamorgan, and the nearly-unused Gwent, are the two odd ones out here, I think. Bencherlite^Talk 13:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your mesage, I hope that this finds you well! We seem to have a bit of an issue in Wales between the old counties at two levels (ie: Glamorgan and Gwent), and the new counties. Everything seems to need to be catagorised at three levels in places, which just makes things confusing. I think most of the middle stuff (like Gwent), has been removed, and the old stuff could be worth keeping as most of the historical sections relate to those old counties. But does it need to include buildings and other stuff (ie: the M4?), that clearly were not built in the middle ages? I think its a debate worth taking to the WikiProject Wales TalkPage. In the mean time, I pushed some articles down into the new counties from Category:Sport in Glamorgan - personally, a good example of where the old county was hindering development of the new counties categories. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 07:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

All well here, thanks. What I've done is push all the rest of the articles in "buildings and structures / listed buildings in Glamorgan" categories into appropriate "B&S / listed buildings in New County Borough" categories, reflecting modern location, adding {{container}} to the Glamorgan categories and a note that they should only be used for sub-cats by modern counties, then made the modern county categories sub-cats of the Glamorgan category. That way, someone who wants to start browsing at the new county level will find the buildings in that county, and someone who starts at the old county level will find the buildings through the new county subcategories. How does that approach sound to you? There are some awkwardnesses at the edges, since according to that well-known reliable source Wikipedia Caerphilly has switched between the preserved county of Gwent and that of Glamorgan (or was it the other way round?) making "buildings in Caerphilly CB" an anomolous one when choosing parent categories, but I think it works most of the time. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 08:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

SABMiller

Hi, I know that you are a very experienced editor on business-related topics and would therefore be most grateful for your input in a discussion at Template talk:SABMiller, and at the talk pages of the Polish subsidiary and brands of SAB at Talk:Kompania Piwowarska, Talk:Dojlidy Brewery and Talk:Żubr (beer). The issue concerns whether the SABMiller template should be included on Poland-related SAB articles, and whether the SAB template should include the brands and main subsidiaries/joint ventures of SAB. Rangoon11 (talk) 13:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

APCOA

Hello, a conversation concerning the APCOA Parking article and its continued inclusion is taking place here. Your views are most welcome and will be appreciated. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) 11:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Exercise category removals

I had a look at your contributions to try and see why you removed |Category Exercise from Dance and Health and it seems you are removing it from a lot of other things I'd have though rather relevant too and I don't see why. The Dance and health article deals specifically with the benefits and problems of dance as an exercise. What are the criteria or why are you doing this thanks? Dmcq (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your message - I hope that this finds you well! I was trying to clarify the articles in Category:Exercise, and it appears that a number of what at some point were unrelated articles which were sat within other categories are now sat twice in that category once someone had moved the main catgeory under Exercise. Hence Dance and health sits under the Category:Dance and is listed in Exercise, as is the article Dance. In recategorising Dance and health I felt that the health bit was less exercise orientated and more helath orientated, hence my re-cat. But if you have a strong preference or objection, I have no set position on the issue. Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Wedding dress of Kate Middleton

Hi Trident, I see your changed this article to a redirect. I've reverted this, as the topic is a notable one and merits it's own article. In addition, if you want an article deleted please use the proper processes such as AFD. So far you seem to be accusing Chzz of using the article to spam his "own website." However, none of the linked websites appear to be owned by Chzz (or I certainly haven't seen any evidence of that) and your accusation seems to be lacking in an assumption of good faith. The article is new, and it is not fair to stifle it's growth at this early stage, please allow it to be expanded - see this essay. For similar reasons it's unfair on the article to say "no other wedding dress articles," if we took that attitude to article creation, then Wikipedia would have 0 articles! Thanks for taking the time to read this, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Dress

Please could you explain what you mean by, User:Chzz:Chzz seems just to want to promote their own website here?

I think you are very very mistaken, in claiming I have any involvement with that website. I absolutely do not.

I do not have any more interest in "that dress" than I do in e.g. Inauguration of Barack Obama, Fountain of Time , Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1), Suki Sugite Baka Mitai, Marco Polo, or any of the other hundreds of articles I have worked on.

My intent, in creating the article, was entirely altruistic. It is clearly a notable topic (about as clear as could be), and I resent your implication that there was any form of duplicitous behaviour. Please, retract your comment. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  12:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm truly quite shocked with what happened to that article. It was CSD-tagged after 15 minutes, then it was redirected, and then submitted for deletion discussion within the hour - despite it featuring in literally thousands of newspapers around the world. Plus, I was accused of COI.

And we wonder why Wikipedia is not attracting new editors? Sheesh.  Chzz  ►  20:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Imogen Thomas

Who is the soccer player she was with??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.77.134.128 (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Leeds student edit

Hi Trident13,

I am the deputy editor for Leeds Student newspaper and I changed the Leeds Student wikipedia page back to a previous one that had the 'other alumni' list. The reason for doing so was because quite a lot of people had been asking what had happened to the list. It's a very useful tool for getting in touch with old alumni members of the paper when we are organising social events, or if we need contacts, or sometimes if we need a quote about a story that took place at Leeds University a while ago. I know there are no references for this list and this is why you removed it, but this is because it's very hard to reference such a thing. But the only people who edit this page are those who have worked on the Leeds Student paper so they are unlikely to lie. In fact, I've met many of the people who are on the alumni list at Leeds Student alumni gatherings. Finally, many students spend three hard years working on Leeds Student Newspaper and although they do not all become editors, many would like to be remembered on the wikipedia page, and the list also shows how good Leeds Student is at helping people find a way into the media world.

So, is it possible we can put the list back without references? We would all be sincerely grateful if so.

Best wishes,

Tom

Beynon8 (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination

Hi. I've nominated Sarah Burton, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. January (talk) 21:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

BLPN - Stephanie Booth

Hi there is a report at the BLPN here about this BLP that has mostly been created by you so this is a courtesy note, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

update - I have unarchived this unresolved issue and it is now at - Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Stephanie Booth - please comment - regards. Off2riorob (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Sarah Burton

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Since nobody seems to have bothered to notify you…

Nobody seems to have actually notified you, but an edit of yours is being discussed at great length on Jimbo's talk page, having made multiple newspapers. You may want to comment there. – iridescent 09:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your thought and humanity. I would offer to assist you in your efforts in Wikipedia, but in light of Jimbo Wales attack, have decided to take some time out. Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:French professional bodies

Category:French professional bodies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Dominique Strauss-Kahn

Hi. I see you took out the word "sodomized" and put "sexual assault" because you said it was too serious to have without a reference. Can I ask you not to make edits to subjects which are you not familiar with? And if you are still unfamiliar with them, then at least do a bare minimum of research before making edits? It is being reported in all the major papers that the maid said that Strauss-Kohn forced oral sex on her. I simply went to The New York Post and got a reference. Anybody can go around and remove things from Wikipedia claiming "there is no reference for it". I would guess half of Wikipedia is like that. What Wikipedia really needs is for somebody to come along and put the reference in. But when you take things out of Wikipedia, then readers who look at it after your edit do not know what was there and can't provide a reference (because they don't know what wasn't there). Please, take a second or two to verify things before just going around deleting things. If you had bothered to read any of the articles on the Strauss-Kohn mess, you would have known that he sodomized her (or is alleged to have done so). Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betathetapi545 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

The discussion on the articles talkpage has progressed beyond your limited view. The rules are quite clear that unless WP:RS can be sourced, we can't insert such information, make such a claim - or credibly claim to be an encyclopaedia. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 12:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

TIME OUT: effective from May 2011

PLEASE NOTE: In light of an edit I made on a persons article, and a later personal attack on me led by Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales, I am presently taking some time out from Wikipedia. During this time I will answer no messages on my talkpage, or eMail sent to me via the EMail User system Thank You for your understanding.

Proposed deletion of Stephanie Booth

The article Stephanie Booth has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nirame (talk) 14:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wurlitzers in the United Kingdom

The article Wurlitzers in the United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 84.93.140.77 (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Regan Kohl Bitburg 1985.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Regan Kohl Bitburg 1985.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for John Lipsky

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

synclair

hello. what is your source that she had "initial school level education in America"? could not find it. thanks! --194.250.10.236 (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Liverpool F.C. wiki

Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sophie Howe

The article Sophie Howe has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zangar (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:George Gilbert Scott

Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 August 17#Categories named after architects. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Welsh legal professionals

Category:Welsh legal professionals, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Trident13. You have new messages at Talk:John Howard Davies.
Message added 07:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

John MacLennan Buchanan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John MacLennan Buchanan. This proposal will potentially affect the disambiguation of all John Buchanan articles, so you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MTS Peanut (talk) 07:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for starting the Bab al-Azizia article, which has grown fast.

North Wales is a beautiful place. Bigturtle (talk) 03:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Wales Barnstar
		I'm ashamed you haven't been given one of these before. Thanks for all your wonderful efforts in improving all things Welsh. Diolch. FruitMonkey (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Jonathon Ive Article

I was wondering if you had the time available to check out this edit on the Jonathon Ive article

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Ive&action=historysubmit&diff=450846079&oldid=450730086

Many thanks

Darrell_Greenwood (talk) 10:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, how can I help you? What do you want help with? You seemed to have removed an awful lot of useful/standard stuff, like the infobox for starters, and at least one ref. Be good to get the infobox back, and I note from your edit notes that the refs may be old/out of date. Best Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks. Appreciate your interest and action. Perfect. Darrell_Greenwood (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Marine Connection

Hi Trident 13.

Perhaps you can help me, I have a question and do not know how to go about getting the help I need.

I noticed that you update the Marine Connection Wiki page that I originally did. My question is actually about a newly created page for Marine Connection of Facebook. Did you make it, or do you know how I can find out who did?

It is here:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Animal-Rescue/100956029946881?sk=info#!/pages/Marine-Connection/108294055865266?sk=info

Thank you for your help.

Beakymouse (talk) 16:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Beakymouse

Hi, I hope that this finds you well! No, I didn't create the page on Facebook: my edit here simply changed the categories. The information on that Facebook page is simply the wikipedia article here sucked in to the Facebook page, which is an option that the Facebook page creator is offered by Facebook within the page editorial controls. Do you represent the charity, and are you trying to reclaim the brand? Facebook have some pretty tough rules on who can claim what "vanity page url" (it used to be 25 likes; as of last week it became a "claim under these rules"). If you are trying to reclaim the page for the chairty, and can prove that you represent the charity, then on that page you directed me toward there is a REPORT button in the left hand column. Follow that procedure, verify yourself as representing the charity, and they will quickly redirect the page to an authorised by the charity owner/editor. If you need any help, come back and ask, and if you do represent the charity I am more than willing to help you polish up and improve the existing article here. With Best Regards, --Trident13 (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

List of vegetable oils entry for cassia oil

I just wanted to let you know that I've removed the entry for cassia oil in the list of vegetable oils article. This is because cassia oil is not a pressed oil (which is what list of vegetable oils is about), but an essential oil. I don't know if there's an entry in list of essential oils for it, but that'd be the place to add it if not. Thanks! Waitak (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Category removal

Hi Trident13. I noticed that you removed Category:English racecar drivers from Piers Courage. In case you were planning to do the same to any other articles, I'd like to point out that it's WP:F1 convention that F1 drivers are included in both the "<nationality> Formula One drivers" and "<nationality> racecar drivers" cateories - see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Formula_One/Conventions#Drivers. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 23:23, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Jony Ive edits

Hi,

I didn't mean to remove the whole info box, just to change the photograph. How can one do that without disrupting the info box? My apologies. The other edits I made are legitimate:

Jony's wife Heather is not a historian. The "obvious influence" of Dieter Rams on the first iOS calc function is opinion, not fact.

Pls advise, thx, IDharper (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Harper Alexander

Category:Pedestrian bridges in Wales

Is there a definition for these?

If this category is to be useful to readers (or else why bother?) is there any need to distinguish bridges built for pedestrian traffic (often recent and narrow) and old bridges, like Monnow bridge and Over Bridge that were once major trade routes for horse or carriage traffic, but have now been pedestrianised? Both of these were active road bridges until within the last few decades. There are also rare bridges like Pontypridd where the steepness of the bridge required steps (and thus made wheeled traffic impractical) but were major horse routes. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Raised also at Category talk:Pedestrian bridges Andy Dingley (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I hope that this finds you well! In summary: great question! All that I did last night was follow the existing categories/precedents, and create a Welsh-bridge structure. I started this exercise on the back of creating at artcile for Hengoed Viaduct - a former railway bridge that is now part of National Cycle Route 47. So should it be a railway bridge, or a cycle bridge (a category that doesn't exist, hence the precedent seems to be to use pedestrian bridge as the preferred catageory). I hope that you get an answer to what is a very reasonable question. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violations in personal stubs

Hi. I noticed that a number of the pages you've listed as "personal project stubs" appear to be news stories and other material copied and pasted from elsewhere on the Internet. For example, User:Trident13/Conyers is copied and pasted from The New York Times, User:Trident13/NAllport from the Western Mail, and User:Trident13/Mathaba from the organization's web site. Other pages like User:Trident13/APNC quack like copypastes. You should be aware that posting this content most likely violates copyright and Wikipedia policy. Please look through your user space and remove any copyrighted material. Thank you. Lagrange613 (talk) 00:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I see you have only been here for a short while (May 2011), but as I have seen that you have done so little article creation, read the section on personal stub pages at Wikipedia:Subpages as that's part of their function!!! They collect - act like storages buckets - of data for potential articles. They hence generally don't fall foul of such rules that apply to the main space. Over an undefined period of time - some of mine are over 4years old - they may or may not create text on subjects which are suitable for the main space (ie: subject may not pass WP:notability, and in creation they use input from various sources, including books and other webpages. Have you ever seen or researched how one source often conflicts another, even creating differences in basic time lines? Hence why in my system I take in the key facts and supporting text (Input1, Input2, Input3 etc - Some of those are straight text copies, and some may take sections, but that's for reference/article build), and then create a new and referenced base timeline above it. Most often these days I then add a suitable infobox, and then use an article format I like/am happy with/has from that team been rated good, and create new original text suitable which could then be placed into production in the mainspace. Do you think after 5years here I don't understand copyvio??? Perhaps try a bit of article creation yourself first, and then you'll understand the difficulty of article creation. You won't get to become an administrator without a bit of article creation in your record here! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Apparently it is you who needs to read Wikipedia:Subpages: "Copyright violations are not permitted on any page in Wikipedia." You can pull nonexistent rank and call me "idiot" all you want, but them's the rules. I came here first out of respect for all the good you've done for the project, but if you don't act my next destination is CCI. I doubt they'll see it your way. Lagrange613 (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Having been through this a few times with more experienced editors, can I suggest that you reread the section at Rule4? These personal pages are not created to "share" with other editors, they are only created to collect potential content to create potential articles. You didn't as you falsely claim come here out of any "respect" hence my reflection of your attitude. Please do as you wish. Rgds --Trident13 (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Trident13. I noticed this discussion while visiting Lagrange's talk page on other business. I am pretty sure that copyright violations are not allowed in user space. As a test, I am going to tag one of the pages for speedy deletion as this will attract the attention of another admin. The page I have selected for the test is User:Trident13/Conyers, which can be sourced to the copyright material at The New York Times. Regards, --Dianna (talk) 06:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

And now it's gone. Please recover any urls from the remaining subpages that are copyright violations if you wish to have access to the material, and tag the pages for deletion using {{db-g7}} or {{db-g12}}. Thank you. --Dianna (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Simon Rivers

Hi Trident13, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Simon Rivers--However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article contains grammatical errors. I'm kind of new here myself but let me know if there is any way I can help. Thanks, Amy Z (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Tunnelling in Vietnam

Hello Trident13. I'm curious about this edit [3] to Tunnelling companies of the Royal Engineers. AFAIK Australian engineers in Vietnam were used to search and clear Viet Cong tunnels, but they didn't conduct offensive tunnelling in the manner that occurred during the First World War. Indeed its difficult to conceptualise how or what that would have achieved (although I admit I'm not an Engineer so perhaps my knowledge here is deficient). I'm not really sure how one can equate the battlefield circumstances of an insurgency/counter-insurgency (i.e. Vietnam) and the tactics the Australians used there, with those of the mass industrial warfare experienced 50 years earlier during the First World War. Could you please elaborate and provide references for your assertion? Otherwise I think it may need to be removed. Of course I'm happy to discuss though. Thanks in advance. Anotherclown (talk) 08:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Are you going to respond to my question? Anotherclown (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Edward Davenport

Good call. Definitely preferable to my other alternative: Edward Davenport (bit of a bad egg). Yunshui (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of European Anti Poverty Network

The article European Anti Poverty Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, does not meet WP:GNG. Not clear whether this still exists: homepage is now a blog on very different subjects...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 13:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

I have just deleted four pages in your user space, all of which had been flagged for speedy deletion because they were substantial copyright infringements. You must not copy material from other websites unless copyright has been released. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

And I've just had to remove another one: User:Trident13/Deltabox. I agree with the other editors who have expressed opinions here that copyvios are not allowed even in user-space. There was another brief discussion about this in 2009 - archived here. If you could find another way of assembling your articles, I'm sure I can say that everyone would be pleased to see your valuable contributions continue.  —SMALLJIM  16:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Ken Hames

Hi. Just to let you know that I've removed some potentially contentious info, which was unsourced. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Trident13! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Trident13/APNC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Trident13/APNC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lagrange613 06:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

• Hello, Trident13. I came here because of the speedy deletion nomination mentioned above, and found that, as you know, various pages you have created have been deleted as copyright infringements over the last few years. Seeing another example prompted me to check through more of the pages in your userspace, and I found a few more examples. None of the exmples I have seen have been recently created, so it seems that this may be a hangover from an earlier time when you had less understanding of the issue, rather than a current problem with your editing. Nevertheless, copyright infringements cannot be allowed to remain. Since the number of pages in your user space runs to many dozens, checking them all would be a difficult and time-consuming task, and I hope I don't need to do that. Can you help by picking out any pages which you know or suspect you copied from elsewhere, and tagging them for deletion with {{db-user}}? Thanks. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

• • Hello, JamesBWatson, and Trident 13 too, if you are still around. I have been going through the sub-pages and nominating for deletion, deleting myself, and removing content, where it is still possible to locate the source material of the copyright violations. All subpages are being tagged "noindex" so that they will no longer appear in Google searches. I asked Trident13 to help with this work but so far no help has been forthcoming. --Dianna (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music from Somerset

Category:Music from Somerset, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Contour Aerospace, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Acton, West London and Emirates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Coralie Rose, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Waking the Dead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Which Book?

If you add a sentence like:

• "In December 2010, Welsh actor Matthew Rhys bought the film rights to the book."

Which book? There could be five book, or fifty books, on the same subject.

"I bought the film rights to the World War II book." How many WW2 books are there? 5,000? You need to write like nobody has ever heard of what your are writing about. An alien from Zizzbopla just landed and wants to know. Don't ass-u-me that people know what you are thinking. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Peel (gynaecologist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Department of Education and Prince Edward

Marcus Setchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to NHS and King Edward VII Hospital

Murder of Lesley Whittle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Balaclava and John Morrison

Sonali Shah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Salford and The World Today

Alan Farthing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to West London

La Senza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administration

RNIB College, Loughborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Trident13/RNADTrecwn

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Trident13/RNADTrecwn, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →Στc. 06:18, 27 December 2011 (UTC)