- 1 Regarding your revert
- 2 Hellenisation page
- 3 Closure at WP:AE
- 4 Latest Sulmues SPI
- 5 Barnstar
- 6 WP:AE
- 7 Formal mediation has been requested
- 8 Request for mediation rejected
- 9 Request
- 10 Re
- 11 Reverting
- 12 Greeks
- 13 Talk:Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence/GA1
- 14 Disambiguation link notification for May 27
- 15 Alexander
- 16 Removal of sourced information
- 17 Imbros.
- 18 Greek inhabitation
- 19 Gangaridai and Alexander the Great
- 20 Disambiguation link notification for August 12
- 21 Mathematics in medieval Islam
- 22 Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
- 23 Turkish people
- 24 Russian people article
- 25 Thank you
- 26 Formal mediation has been requested
- 27 Request for mediation accepted
- 28 Map
- 29 Expulsion of Cham Albanians page
Regarding your revert
Regarding this reversion, amongst which you added an edit summary "no, the lede is meant to provide a summary of the main points of the article,not mention every empire or state that ruled the territory."
Could you point me out any other empire or state that ruled all of Turkey for 200 years, or even close to it, had a considerable historical impact, and that's not listed in the lede?.. Especially as all other pre-Turkic history in some way, whether culturally or ethnicity-wise has been mentioned. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please take this to the article talkpage so that other users can weigh in if they wish to. Athenean (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have notice that you have undone my revisions on the Hellenisation section on the Alexander the Great page, and when you undid th revision gave the reason POV pushing. However I must disagree as while you undid the revision you kept the sources, and it was I that added those courses to support what I had written. Thus, what is currently written is not supported by any of the sources, or any scholarship. Furthermore, I fail to see how I was pushing my point of view, I was entirely fair and was not trying to detract from any side, I was simply reflecting modern scholarship on the matter and thus was not pushing my point of view. Indeed what you have replaced my revision with is entirely inaccurate, again I can understand your concern that my edit was perhaps an instance of historical revisionism; however it is not. I was simply correcting the section due to the addition of the mount Meru bit, keeping the original sources which are in no way relevant even contradicting the point made about mount Meru. Indeed, on the issue of mount Meru that is traditional Hindu "cosmology" (as it was describing the universe, not the solar system) and was not accepted beyond explaining the metaphysical universe, in traditional Indian astronomy/astrology; however, the use of a heliocentric planetary model with elliptical orbits was favored until the arrival of the Ptolemaic model which proved very popular as the arithmetic was simpler and yielded equally accurate results with the relatively inaccurate data available at the time. I will refrain from making any more edits until we resolve this issue, please do contact me soon as i want to settle this amiably and with no further disagreements. Looking forward to hearing from you.Bodha2 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Please see this notice which I added at Talk:Turco-Albanians. Though the enforcement request against you was closed with no action, the moral of the story for all parties seems obvious. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Latest Sulmues SPI
|The Barnstar of Diligence|
|Awarded to Athenean for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)|
Formal mediation has been requested
- VM stacking, read last comments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Vladimir_Putin#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediation SaintAviator lets talk 00:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
In the article Hijab by country there are constant attempts by registered users and IP users (whom I suspect could be duplicate accounts of one person) to show the illegal entity of "Northern Cyprus" as a separate and legitimate country, and obviously in many other articles, without much ado. I revert it, but they change it back, even including my amended version that show the Turkish Cypriots as a distinct society but as a subsection under the legitimate section of Cyprus. Could you do something about these users and alert them?
To this. I am reacting so defensibly because you claimed this in an arbitration request, and I will react even more defensibly if you continue doing the same. My very best wishes (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, this is Woodgridge. Yesterday, you reverted my sourced edit with the edit summary "rv alexyflemming sock" without raising your claim in WP whereas WP has mechanisms for such accusations to be recorded and processed. It would be wise/ethical to introduce the claims with proofs before accusing the others.Woodgridge (talk) 17:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence/GA1
Since you took a look at Resnjari's comments about the supposed copyvio issues of 100+ year old images, I wonder what else can be done in this case. By the way all necessary info was already added in commons.Alexikoua (talk) 12:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greek language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey Athenean, regarding Alexander the Great, I wanted to just keep it at India myself initially when I reverted those two users, but after realizing that that part is often changed by "certain" IP's/SPA accounts who seem overly concerned regarding how many square inches Alexander had conquered of what is nowadays their country, I tried to make it more precise. This indeed made it way too complicated however as you correctly told. "The more you have the more complicated life gets", as we say, haha. Anyway, to put it short, I just wanted to say that I changed it in good faith in order to prevent more SPA IP hoppers/socks/and what-not being lured to it. That's all. I would never have changed it if it didn't attract that much disruption. That's all :-) Bests and take care - LouisAragon (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- No worries, I know you meant well, and appreciate the effort. Athenean (talk) 02:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Removal of sourced information
You just removed sourced content without reaching consensus or providing rational explanation. If you continue the incident and your bias will be reported at WP:AE, thank you. Take careJudist (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- I explained to you on the talkpage why the material doesn't belong. If you that's your problem. Feel free to go to AE anytime. Athenean (talk) 10:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to ask why content with no reliable (invalid links and in Greek Language) sources should still be on Imbos' page? And why should content with sources which are not even in English still be on an English Wikipedia page? In this case Imbos, Please remove the greek sources from the page and move them to the Greek wikipedia page. DavidThomson1997 (talk) 22:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, but I am referring to inhabited by *humans* not human ancestors (which does indeed go much farther back. Perhaps specification is in order, but I figured that would be quickly assumed.
- Europe, including Greece, has been inhabited by anatomically modern humans for the last 40k or so years. Human beings did not evolve in the 7th century BC. Athenean (talk) 03:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Gangaridai and Alexander the Great
On the Gangaridai and Alexander the Great articles, this Bangladeshi nationalist (User Tiger Hafiz) always changes the historical articles to modern Bangladesh, instead of historical Bengal. Please help protecting wiki from nationalism. (2600:1001:B02E:E4D:D85F:93B2:9885:587 (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC))
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albanians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthodox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Mathematics in medieval Islam
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Resnjari (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Please feel free to discuss the population in Talk:Turkish people. Your argument that the sources are POV need backing up. I have included both high and low estimates so I don't see the problem here.O.celebi (talk) 06:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Russian people article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russians, my input on the notable achievements article is strongly based on this one, kind regards, please keep informing me on how to expand the Turkish people article the right way thank you. Redman19 (talk) 08:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I fully understand the Wikipedia standards now, thank you sir, never knew who I could adress to get the right information. When having trouble, I will contact you for help or intel, kind regards Redman19 (talk) 09:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
Request for mediation accepted
No dude, explanation was in the map change summary. I will add the reports I used to the talk page this evening. It's not a rule as far as I can see that only PEW reports can be used.
If you believe that Bulgaria has 7% Muslim population when 2001 census has no 'undeclared' option and has almost 13% Muslim population, and in 2011 census number of Turks in Bulgaria are almost same but Muslim population is 7% and undeclared is 20%. Then it's not healthy to use the information as 7%. Got what I mean right? Berkaysnklf (talk 10:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Expulsion of Cham Albanians#Start of mediation (I hope). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)