User talk:Tufantufan123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Bobcats 23 (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Tufantufan123, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Tufantufan123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Stats in football players' infoboxes and statistics tables[edit]

Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Statistics tables also usually have a date which you should update when updating the stats. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 22:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Please also update timestamp above stats tables or your edits are considered disruptive. QED237 (talk) 00:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Come on now, last chance. You have to update the timestamps. QED237 (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I do have official information updates, please stop changing my arrangements, I do tranfermarket can also see the updates you will see that it is true.

Unless the timestamps are updated they are not okay on wikipedia. It con not say "updated after matches played 13 January" and then you have added matches after that. Then it is an disruptive edit and you will be blocked. Please read and try understand what everyone is telling you. QED237 (talk) 22:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Deniz Yılmaz. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Timestamp QED237 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nuri Şahin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Updating the stats without updating the timesamp is considered vandalism. You were twice advised not to do this. --Jaellee (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aurélien Chedjou, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Timestamp now or get blocked QED237 (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I do have official information updates, please stop changing my arrangements, I do tranfermarket can also see the updates you will see that it is true.

THe stats might be correct but you MUST update the TIMESTAMPS. It can not say "updated as of 13 January" and then you add matches after that. Please read and try to understand what we have written. And transfermarkt is not a reliable source as it is user edited. QED237 (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Disruptive editing. You need to read carefully what others are saying here. You must provide timestamp updates anytime you're updating these stats. You must also provide a more reliable source.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  only (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Jaellee. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dedé (footballer born 1978) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Jaellee (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Raul Meireles. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ~Amatulić (talk) 21:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
a footballer to play a number of matches a match increase to make changes How is it destructive editing is considered, as well as my changes are completely accurate, since you is right, if you know me cite the source without showing me the wrong arrangement did you say the main changes you've made destructive editing is and no source I do not count changes without showing wrong, I want to cancel my membership Can you tell me how I was going to cancel.
The most recent mistake you did, you can see pressing this link. You MUST update the timeastamps of when an edit was made as you have been told so many times. If you dont it says "updated as of (an old date)" and then an other editor can come and add the same info again. Edits wothout updating timestamp is disruptive and you should have listened to all of the attempts to talk to you and all the warnings you got.
Regarding to your question about the account so from what I now accounts can not be deleted but your talkpage can be I think. QED237 (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Accounts cannot be deleted. We can replace the talk page with a "retired" notice if you intend to leave Wikipedia permanently.
Personally I'd rather see you take to heart the advice you have been given, appeal your block, and become a valued contributor. Many people start out who are well intentioned but unaware of the policies and guidelines, and get blocked. If you can formulate an unblock request (see the instructions in the block message above) that convinces us that you understand why you were blocked, and how you will conduct yourself if unblocked, then there should be no problem unblocking you, so that you may continue working with the community to improve this encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)