User talk:Tvanhare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hi Tvanhare, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!Bouncywikilogo.gif

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction and check the Teahouse to contact Wikipedians who are available for assistance, or even for a chat.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. 16-cell.gif

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC).

September 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! John of Reading (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Tvanhare. You have new messages at John of Reading's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- John of Reading (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Mass Additions of[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg

This is the only warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing without further notice.--Hu12 (talk) 18:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hu12 -- Today you issued me a warning to post what you call "spam" into Wikipedia. Let me understand just what constitutes spam. If I have an article that is directly on point to the Wikipedia page and I add it to the External Links section, why is that wrong? What am I missing here? For example if I write a story with in depth research on the Fiat G.55 aircraft. Why would it be wrong to include it in the External Links section on that page -- -- can you tell me?

What you write above makes no sense because it would mean that more properly nobody should be allowed to publish any links in the External Links category, even if the content is DIRECTLY on point to the Wiki article.

I request you consider this and amend your comment. It would constitute spam if I were to post an advertisement about some product or service that I was trying to sell into places where there is no relationship to the content. I am not a commercial business and the links posted are 100% accurate to the pages onto which I've posted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvanhare (talkcontribs) 18:58, 4 November 2012‎

"I publish a website called" -- Tvanhare, 15 September 2012
I'll repeat what I've stated on my page;
Unfortunatly the External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, and in this case, its your website. Your conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. Your contributions to wikipedia under Tvanhare and IP, consist mainly of adding external links to and is considered WP:LINKSPAM. Looking through your contributions as a whole, the all seem to be related only. It has become apparent that your account and IP are only being used for self-promotion. Since your site is also an Adsense site you have a financial connection to this topic, See "public relations, and marketing". Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising". Equally Wikipedia is not a place to to promote your site.
--Hu12 (talk) 19:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

First it is not an "Adsense" site, whatever that means. Second, I am an expert in aviation so of course I would submit on the topic of aviation. If you want me to submit on the topic of civil engineering instead, I have to say I have nothing to add. If you want those of us who are experts in a topic to not participate, then this is the best way to do it. Is that your goal? What you're writing makes no sense. I don't make a living off of Historic Wings -- that isn't why I publish it. I publish because I'm adding to the knowledge and information available online about aviation history. I've been doing this for 15 years and have never encountered anyone who wasn't anything but thankful for the amount of effort and research I put into it. I have to say, I don't understand your point -- I am surprised you would call what I do spam. It makes no sense, seriously. You might want to think it through a bit before you make such a hasty conclusion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvanhare (talkcontribs) 20:11, 4 November 2012‎

You've edited 48 articles on Wikipedia. You've added your website to 47 of them. It doesn't take an expert to see that the bigger picture clearly shows someone who is using Wikipedia to promote their own interests. --Hu12 (talk) 21:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)