A barnstar for you!
|The Editor's Barnstar|
|Thanks for your work on the Stanford University article! -download 20:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)|
Rankings of universities in the United States
Hey, thought you might be interested in the discussion and edit warring at Talk:Rankings of universities in the United States. Best, -download 01:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Would you please explain why it's not redundant? Those "numerous rankings and measures" include undergraduate selectivity already. The lead should be a concise and precise summary or preview of the whole page and details are well retained in the corresponding sections. Adding such specific indicators is similar to adding all those rankings there, which is completely redundant and of undue weight. In dialogue with Biomedicinal 05:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Your recent editing history at Stanford University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You do NOT have consensus to include the POV table Theroadislong (talk) 10:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)