User talk:Tyrsóg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Peter O'Toole". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!-- KeithbobTalk 17:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Saint Patrick shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 19:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

If there was no consensus for the edit why did you revert it back? Also you said in your edit summary that the contentious edit in question regarding Romano-British is already on talk-page, no it is not, the edit-warring editor who keeps reverting back to his change without consensus refuses to discuss it. So I am going to revert it back once more for the day, although I think you share the same views as him and will simply revert it back. Tyrsóg (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I reverted it because it's been like that for over a month and some portions, quite a bit longer. I also opened a talk page discussion. Seeing as you have broken WP:3RR, will you revert yourself or do I have to report you? --NeilN talk to me 20:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
There was no such discussion open, the one you did was on a completely different matter altogether, I have since opened one. Also you do realise that you never issued a warning to the other editor, is it because you agree with him or just forgot? Tyrsóg (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The other editor has two reverts. If he had three today, he would have gotten the same warning. --NeilN talk to me 20:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)