- 1 Hey!
- 2 Grass Fight
- 3 Rollback enabled on your account
- 4 User:Patar knight
- 5 Thank You!
- 6 Vandalism on my user page
- 7 User Page
- 8 that person
- 9 Userpage vandalism revert
- 10 Thanks
- 11 Credit default swap
- 12 Thanks
- 13 Invitation
- 14 Talk:British Columbia Coast
- 15 Red Raiders Kicker Matt Williams
- 16 Thanks!
- 17 mind explaining why?
- 18 My user page
- 19 Re:Oops
- 20 wow
- 21 Userpage vandalism
- 22 Many thanks!
- 23 Thanks!
- 24 Thanks
- 25 IP vandal on android page
- 26 Janke
- 27 Much obliged
- 28 Grazie!
- 29 Strikeforce
- 30 2008 Election
- 31 Thanks
- 32 U Miami
- 33 Thanks
- 34 Template:Dolphins2010Draft Picks
- 35 Reviewer rights
- 36 Ulric1313 is brave, gentle, kind, and good!
- 37 Miss Lara
- 38 UFC Bonuses
- 39 dab, AWB
- 40 Antarctica Article DABs
- 41 dab
- 42 Riding disambiguation
- 43 Thanks
- 44 An invitation to join WikiProject Rihanna
- 45 Thanks for Dab
- 46 River dabs Castlereagh River etc
- 47 You've Got Mail
- 48 Many more thanks
- 49 James Hartley (Indian Army officer)
- 50 Season's tidings!
- 51 Thanks
- 52 Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
- 53 Glad Tidings and all that ...
- 54 May 2014 disambig contest: let's do it again!
- 55 Thank you
- 56 Merry Merry
- 57 Happy New Year!
- 58 You're Invited!
- 59 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 60 Season's Greetings
- 61 Thanks for catching missed disambiguation links
- 62 Reference errors on 6 April
- 63 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 64 Merry, merry!
- 65 Thanx muchly
- 66 Tom Waits genre
- 67 New Page Reviewing
- 68 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
- 69 December 2017
- 70 Seasons' Greetings
- 71 Articles for Creation Reviewing
Rollback enabled on your account
I have noticed that you revert quite a bit of vandalism. Since you have demonstrated that you have a good grasp of what constitutes vandalism, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback may be removed at any time.
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! J.delanoygabsadds 05:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- You should have had it long ago. I saw you revert vandalism on 3 or 4 pages on my watchlist, looked at your contribs, and was like "Whoa". Have fun, and keep up the good work! J.delanoygabsadds 05:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
|The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|For your assistance in keeping USS New Jersey (BB-62) vandal free while the article was up on the mainpage I herby award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 00:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)|
Vandalism on my user page
on the Kama Sutra should we ban him or give him 2 more chances? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talk • contribs) 05:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Thnx Ulric i gave him 2, but he did it 4 times. SO what? u know who im talking about right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Userpage vandalism revert
Credit default swap
- Hi there, please refrain from deleting entire sections of this article without discussing your rationale on the talk page. Thanks! 220.127.116.11 (talk) 23:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
|The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|Hi Ulric1313, Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 00:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)|
Can you please check the comment on this page, Talk:British Columbia Coast. IMHO, a whole section should be re-written or put into wikiquotes. I noticed you had done some revisions and corrections on the article page. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 21:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Red Raiders Kicker Matt Williams
- No, they truly do not know when to stop. Thanks again. --Faradayplank (talk) 07:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
mind explaining why?
If you think my edit did not improve the article, that's fine and I'm happy to discuss. Drive-by reversions without any explanation about the actual merits of the change just strikes me as quite rude and counterproductive. The guidelines WP:BOLD explicitly encourage bold improvement of an article, so simply saying the changes are too big, without actual comment on the substance of the change doesn't fly. Thanks. As to my changes, they were actually not big, and I did explain them in the edit summaries they were (1) leave the definition at an actual quote rather than the quote plus a pov paraphrase (2) integrate a one-line section into the main text (3) add another example of a spin-off (4) remove one quite pov statement (at the end of palin) that was in no way necessary to the point. Which of those do you have a problem with? Thanks. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation, and the self-revert. Must have checked in during the wrong few second. Had been a bit put-off by the previous revert, so was not as courteous as I should have been. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
My user page
I am impressed that you are still actively working on New Year Eve :D. I were gonna revert the vandalism from the French_Third_Republic article but you were faster than me. Thank you a lot for keeping wikipedia clean and free. And Happy New Year :). Mgz (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
|The Tireless Contributor Barnstar|
|I noticed your work on disambiguating pages; if anything requires tireless devotion, that's it. Cheers. Bobak (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)|
IP vandal on android page
Hey, could you take a look at Talk:Strikeforce and maybe chip in so we get closer to a consensus for the latest issue? There have been quite a few issues about ignoring sources from mma websites and restructuring the page. Thanks, Sea888 (talk) 00:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey. I need a third party opinion on the article regarding the presidential election in California. Please go on the talk page on the last section and share your opinion. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
|The Wikignome Award|
|For spotting a Methuen / Methuen Publishing snafu I'd made in an article (several actually, sigh) Declan Clam (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)|
Thank you for fixing the link on Miami Hurricanes football. I found the article as of the start of the month to be very POV and filled with peacock words and copyvio's. I have been trying to clean it up. The article needs a fresh pair of eyes to read it from a non-UM perspective. Could you please review it and weigh in with possible changes? Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
|The Working Man's Barnstar|
|For your efforts in fixing the disambiguation links on the 108 Water Margin characters' articles. Excellent job! _LDS (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)|
Sorry for adding the template for speedy deletion, I created "Template:Dolphins2010DraftPicks" and subsequently "Template:Miami Dolphins Draft template list" without noticing you created that template first. I should have move it to "Template:Dolphins2010DraftPicks" to keep a standard within those templates instead of deleting it, I apologize for that but I hope you keep helping in improving that templates, especially the new feature I added with the draft years at the bottom of the templates. Cheers, --Octa62 (talk) 20:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
Ulric1313 is brave, gentle, kind, and good!
I want to thank you for your friendly dab just now, at Medical cannabis. I'm grateful for all your WikiGnomish work; it's you and your kindred that keep this wonderful place from collapsing under its own weight and keep the rest of us safe from the great unwashed who vandalize it. I really, really mean this. So please exclude my dairy products from any nightly rounds that might have become necessary, okay? Thanks again! – OhioStandard (talk) 07:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Antarctica Article DABs
Thanks for alerting me. There are a couple of other folks doing the articles as well; I'll mention something to them tomorrow. Apologies for the late response, but I've been out and away from the computer most of the evening. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
I recently came across one of your edits, and I saw the letters 'dab' in the edit summary. then I clicked on your user's contributions and realized all of them say 'dab'. what is that mean? does 'dab' really apply to all your edit summaries? I'm just curious. Likeminas (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with Brighstone Shop. Are you interested in the Isle of Wight? If so feel free to join WikiProject Wight (sorry cant get link to work !). Mant thanks again Xhavnak (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC).
An invitation to join WikiProject Rihanna
Thanks for Dab
Thanks for disambiguating Newmarket (Suffolk) on the King's Theatre (horse) page. I will be more careful in future as I tend to mention that place a lot in my contributions. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
River dabs Castlereagh River etc
Hello I am shortly proposing that recent moves of rivers in Australia be moved back, hundreds of links left dangling. Your good efforts may be in vain, so would suggest you hold off on these for a bit. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)).
You've Got Mail
Many more thanks
Well done for spotting my misuse of Longchamp. As a blinkered horse racing fan, it never occurred to me that it was anything other than a racecourse. I will take more in future, but I am always thankful for the help. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Howdy. You disambiguated Charles Egerton to Charles Egerton (British Army officer) on this article; the birth/death dates suggest that it's the wrong Charles Egerton so I've reverted for now. There seem to be an unusual number of people by this name, I've tried picking them apart myself before now only to give up in exasperation :( - TB (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
for doing all the disambiguation links on Chahardangeh District. I did a big booboo and you fixed it. Thanks again!
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Glad Tidings and all that ...
May 2014 disambig contest: let's do it again!
Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Ulric1313: In this 75th year of the congressional founding of the US Coast Guard Auxiliary, I am trying to thank every editor who has had a hand in crafting the Wikipedia article about founder Malcolm Stuart Boylan. Thank you very much for your efforts through the years! May you have fair winds and following seas all your days. Taram (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
Happy New Year!
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
Reference errors on 6 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Historical list of the Catholic bishops of the United States page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Thanx for linking Ron Nelson on eight drum corps pages. I checked for other corps that have played his music by referencing www.corpsreps.com and found one that was correctly linked and five that were only linked to Ron Nelson and disambiguated them. GWFrog (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Tom Waits genre
Hi, I am inviting past editors of the Tom Waits article to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Tom_Waits#Genres. I am in dispute with User:TheOldJacobite, who has reverted even my sourced changes and ignored my appeals to discuss the issue. Please express your opinion on the issue if it interests you.--MASHAUNIX 18:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but all of you recent edits have edit summaries that appear to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Reviewing
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.