User talk:Unboxermail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating a series of spammy articles about non-notable internet firms and companies referenced almost entirely to these companies websites. Note that this is not a permanent block, but will remain in place until you demonstrate that you have read and understand the notability policies WP:ORG and WP:WEB, as well as our policy on conflicts of interest, WP:COI.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nick-D (talk) 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unboxermail (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Invalid block reason

Decline reason:

Very valid block reason, and due to the abuse below, I will be removing your access to this talkpage. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I believe you blocked me for invalid reasons, "(Spam / advertising-only account)", because if you would have checked my user activity, you'd notice numerous contributions, that even better completly follow the Wikipedia rules, to multiple articles/and creation of multiple valid articles that follow the rules. Power aparently went to your head, and you decided to block me instead with a blatant lie in the reason. No, my account isn't a "Spam/Advertising-ONLY account", just because in your opinion a few of my contributions broke the rules, even though I wrote them entirely based on a neutral view, linking to multiple other relevant Wiki pages. I have no relation to those companies, I don't even know they existed before seeking information about them. So if those articles are against the rules, why is articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9gag not then? That page has been up since December 2011, and there's "No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, web content or organized event". But I'll stop contribution with articles, since it seems some admins are a bit bias regarding some of them. So I would like to get unblocked, so I can continue contributing like I have been to this date.

Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by using the unblock ticket request system, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of AZ.pl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AZ.pl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AZ.pl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating TzNIC, Unboxermail!

Wikipedia editor Cmckain14 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice!

To reply, leave a comment on Cmckain14's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Orphaned non-free media (File:AZ.pl company logo.png)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:AZ.pl company logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Public Interest Registry organisation.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Public Interest Registry organisation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)