User talk:Urprakhar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Urprakhar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  prashanthns (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Your uploads[edit]

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 09:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


Kanpur Central and Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus[edit]

The box at CST is that of a UNESCO World Heritage Site, which Kanpur Central is NOT. I have added an infobox of a station similar to the one on Bangalore City Railway Station. If you need futher help, contact me. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey I'm a VERY busy person. I've added a basic infobox to Delhi Junction and Howrah Station. You can elaborate it further, so long as you stick to the format. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

An Invite to join the WikiProject Indian Roads[edit]

70px MumbaiPuneExpressway.jpg India-roads.svg
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Urprakhar, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads.
|As you have shown an interest in National Expressway (India) we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

You also work on List of State Highways in Uttar Pradesh --naveenpf (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space[edit]

Information.svg Hey there Urprakhar, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User talk:Urprakhar. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of images removed today here

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Good work on Delhi Metro[edit]

Hi Prakhar,

You have put in substantial effort to keep the pages related to delhi-metro up to the mark. Good work! Keep it up.

U r studying in IIT Kanpur I guess, or did you pass out? --Jayanta (Talk) 14:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of shopping malls in Kanpur[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated List of shopping malls in Kanpur, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Kanpur (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong confess 19:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of shopping malls in Kanpur[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on List of shopping malls in Kanpur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rave 3[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rave 3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Top Jim (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Aerial Green Park.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aerial Green Park.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kanpur univ logo.gif[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kanpur univ logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KrakatoaKatie 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Aerial Green Park.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aerial Green Park.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KrakatoaKatie 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop[edit]

You've been asked once, in 2009, to stop uploading images, tagging them as your own creations, and attaching releases into the public domain. Please go back into your upload log and fix the files you've uploaded - provide sources, provide fair use rationales if appropriate, and use the correct licensing tags for each file. If you need help, ask at the help desk.

This is your last warning to stop uploading files in this manner. If you do it again, you will be blocked for disruption and your images can be deleted. Thank you. - KrakatoaKatie 01:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Delhi Metro: Blue Line[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Delhi Metro: Blue Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Template:Delhi Metro: Orange Line[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Delhi Metro: Orange Line requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. ashwinikalantri talk 04:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. 16:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:JNNURM Bus.gif[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JNNURM Bus.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. 08:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content, as you did at File:Zaheer Khan.jpg. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. 13:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

ANI Discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding You are editing while still blocked for "persistent copyvio image uploads". The thread is WP:AN/I#Blocked Editor Urprakhar. Thank you. - 220.101 talk\Contribs 19:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rave 3[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rave 3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Big Cinemas[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Big Cinemas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Part of a series of non-notable articles written about a group of affiliated businesses cited exclusively to primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

unblock[edit]

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Urprakhar (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

wont leave any stone un turned to leave a reason to block again

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 11:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CorporateM (Talk) 13:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)