User talk:VadersToy
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, VadersToy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:VadersToy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:VadersToy
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:VadersToy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, VoteRiders, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Editorial and opinion commentary. Guest columns are not a reliable source. Donald Albury 23:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- thanks! yeah, still learning how to do references propperly! VadersToy (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- In response to your email, sources cited in Wiokipedia have to be reliable, independent sources. The reliability of a source is always judged in relation to what it is being used to support. The source you were citing at VoteRiders was a guest column by the CEO of the organization, and is therefore not an independent or reliable source for claims about the activities of the organization. If such activities are significant, then we would expect coverage from indepedent, reliable sources. If such sources cannot be found, then the claim does not belong in Wikipedia. - Donald Albury 19:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Donald, thanks for the info. (And for letting me know to use Talk Pages!)
- I am not overly attached to this particular citation, I'm just trying to
- a) repay the wikipedians / editors who have made such a great thing, including you, by contributing
- b) understand what is "reliable" and what is unreliable.
- I am unclear why you think the updated reference is unreliable, and is a guest column by the CEO of the org.
- What are you seeing that I am not? What I see is that the article is from an employee of Time Magazine, part of a set of "11 Democracy Defenders." This short profile was written by Nik Poplik; per his Time author page "Nik Poplik is a reporter at TIME, based in the Washington, D.C. bureau. He covers economic policy and national politics, focusing on Congress, technology, and the economy."
- What are you seeing that I'm not, that makes a set of 11 profiles of "democracy defenders" written by a variety of Time employees, unreliable?
- I genuinely wanna know!
- Thank you for your time on this (and on countless other contributions, I assume, from. your history here!) VadersToy (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- In response to your email, sources cited in Wiokipedia have to be reliable, independent sources. The reliability of a source is always judged in relation to what it is being used to support. The source you were citing at VoteRiders was a guest column by the CEO of the organization, and is therefore not an independent or reliable source for claims about the activities of the organization. If such activities are significant, then we would expect coverage from indepedent, reliable sources. If such sources cannot be found, then the claim does not belong in Wikipedia. - Donald Albury 19:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)