If someone do not participate in a discussion that does not always mean oppostion to your proposal, non participation may be due to many other reasons . I tried to put arguments supporting two points made by you i.e. the Islamic extremism and temple vandalism at the CAA protest talk page, realised no point of arguing with users who fails to see reason, refuses to accept when can't counter you.2405:204:3323:9B54:74E0:D3F4:A8D0:A375 (talk) 08:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing this out. I know; I just gave up since no one was coming forward to leave a comment in my support. Also, since I am a relatively new user, I was being threatened with sanctions. That’s why I left arguing.
That article has apparently been hijacked by biased editors who think that their bias is neutral. So, whenever they see left-wing extremism, they go into a state of cognitive dissonance.— Vaibhavafro💬 03:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
I consider the riot page is also baised.
You know something, they just protected the riot talk page also, although there were angry comments, yet I felt protecting the talk was not needed. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 17:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)