User talk:Vanilla Smith
Vanilla Smith, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Vanilla Smith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC) |
September 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm SeoR. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Randal Plunkett, 21st Baron of Dunsany, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks for the intent to help. However, rules about Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) are strict, and claims such as of marriage require solid citation. Wikipedia is relied on by many, and we cannot assert that someone has married without clear evidence of this. Despite Plunkett's moderate public profile, no such evidence is seen in the usual sources. Should you have citation(s) available, please feel free to re-add. SeoR (talk) 20:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hiya,
- thanks for the message, and yes, I know. The reason is that Randal's social media is the only public source for that information as of now, see https://www.instagram.com/p/DALxEzpNxHI/. However, social media isn't allowed as a source, so there was no point adding it. Regardless, it is a fact he is married now and has a wife and step-daughter, and I think Wikipedia should have those facts right since they are quite significant. Thanks for your vigilance tho, much appreciated! Vanilla Smith (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick and clear reply. I will review that link, but as you indicate correctly, that's no good as a main source. It would help in making a decision on inclusion, if there were at least one appropriate source, even a reputable local newspaper or radio station. Absent that, these data points cannot go in. The fact that it's true is not enough, there are many true things that are missed. From the way you refer to the subject, you may be acquainted. If so, our policy on connected persons WP:COI can be helpful. Anyway, I hope you can appreciate why we have to be very strict about the standard to include such claims, and the hurt that could be caused if such a claim were inaccurate. Thank you. SeoR (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response, yes I appreciate that. And of course I would not suggest the inclusion of information that is not guaranteed to be true, as you can see in the social media post I referenced before. I will keep an eye out for public sources as confirmation. Thank you. Vanilla Smith (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)