User talk:Veillet

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Grok company.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Grok company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Stephan2: I apologize in advance if this is not the proper place to respond to your notice. The cited png file is effectively used in the Grok (company), in the summary/vignette on the top right of the page. The image file is therefore NOT orphaned, and hence shouldn't be deleted. AFAIK, the claim of fair use is justified, let me know if that is not the case. --Veillet (talk) 17:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Veillet, I've removed the image. I see you are responsible for moving Numenta to Grok (company), even though the press release claiming the company changed its name has been taken down, as well as its website. The official company name, however, is still Numenta, not Grok. The name "Grok" is now used solely for their product, not for the company name. Recently, @Mr. Granger: and @BusterD: have reverted a new user who tried to cleanup this mess. Viriditas (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Viriditas, my bad, I had missed the beat in March 2014 when the company reverted its name back to Numenta... Indeed the Grok logo isn't necessary. I tought of adding the bit of trivia about the short-lived Grok [as company] name to the Numenta page, but that would only add to the confusion (see for e.g. http://numenta.com/technology/blog/navigating-names-at-numenta.html). Veillet (talk) 17:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

No worries. I'm just trying to fix it. Perhaps you can weigh in with this material and add a support or oppose at the requested move discussion I've initiated over at Talk:Grok_(company)#Requested move. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Grok company.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Grok company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Energy Transitions Commission (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Energy Transitions Commission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Energy Transitions Commission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Veillet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Energy Transitions Commission has been accepted

Energy Transitions Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)