We're here to build an encyclopaedia, not a chat group or a blog to discuss personal favourites.
My local time and date:09:38, 30 September 2016 IST[refresh]. Click here to refresh.
I make a few errors unknowingly and some due to technical glitches; thanks to my mobile browser. In such cases feel free to revert even before contacting me. If you're here because of an ongoing nomination at the FLC in which I'm involved, please don't place talkbacks as I'm watching it.
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
From when did Wikipedia start believing in unwritten rules? If it ain't written, it ain't a rule. TV shows, as with films, are deemed notable when principal photography begins. And most definitely the ones that have already been given a series order by a major channel. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
I meant this essay. Your assumption is not true because WP:NF doesn't talk about television. —Vensatry(talk) 06:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Umm... that's exactly what I said. This is not a television pilot that is yet to be picked up for series. It has already been given a full season order AND is filming. So it does meet the requirements, per that essay you cite. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
It says, in most cases, a television series is not eligible for an article until its scheduling as an ongoing series has been formally confirmed by a television network. I'd be happy to include when it goes on air. —Vensatry(talk) 07:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks. — Ssven2Speak 2 me 09:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
So, you wanna participate in it? Its ok if you don't want to expand an article (you can review them if you wish to). Just your support is fine. — Ssven2Speak 2 me 06:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Vensatry. If you have time, could you look at the article Battle of the Bastards(Season 6, episode 9 of Game of Thrones(SPOILER ALERT). I would appreciate it if you could say what needs to be done to make this a Featured article. thanks in advance. AffeL (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
@AffeL: I'm afraid this isn't my area of expertise. I'd suggest you to seek help from writers who've written similar articles; User:Jaguar might be helpful. —Vensatry(talk) 10:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
After withdrawal and subsequent copy-edit(s), i have reopened a FAC for Eega a week ago. If interested, please do consider reviewing the candidate when you are free. All constructive comments are welcomed. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
@Pavanjandhyala: Let me see if I can review it over the weekend. —Vensatry(talk) 10:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
God luck with them. Some look very natural. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Because they're homemade! —Vensatry(talk) 15:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Actual relief from the Photoshop-ed ones we see. Were any of them made in your household? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Nope. My mom isn't a great cook. :) They are from Flickr. —Vensatry(talk) 09:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Finding free images in Flickr has become a mess. Impressive work indeed! :) Well, anything else to say at the FAC? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Convincing the users is even more difficult. In this case, the lady is kind enough to release all her images under a commons-compatible license. :) As for the FAC, I'll post my follow-up comments shortly after reading the article in full. —Vensatry(talk) 17:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)