User talk:Vera26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Vera26! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 10:41, August 6, 2005 (UTC)


The Prince of Tennis (film)[edit]

Thanks for re-writing the plot section. Havok (T/C/c) 08:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Would you mind finding English titles for the soundtrack section? Just place them inside (these things). Thank you. Havok (T/C/c) 08:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. ^^ Havok (T/C/c) 08:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism by 216.9.250.6[edit]

Hi Vera26, thanks for your note, I blocked the IP once again. As a proxy used by so many Blackberry users, I'm afraid that bad faith edits are inevitable. I don't know for sure how many people are affected by blocks, but I know it's a lot. I made sure that the block affects only the IP address and anyone who has a problem with the short block I issued should contact RIM's abuse department. If enough people are affected, and start complaining, maybe RIM will do something. --Deathphoenix ʕ 13:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Category[edit]

No problem on the addition of the category. Thanks!—— Eagle (ask me for help) 22:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

RIAA[edit]

My understanding is that certifications are based on shipments, not actual sales; however, I don't believe A Public Affair has been certified, and I don't see it listed under her certifications on RIAA.com (they may be behind in updating the database, if it happened recently). Everyking 01:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I see you found a source for it, good! Everyking 06:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Koji Seto Article[edit]

Hi Vera,

I changed Koji Setos article back, because, it´s allowed to write down major and actual works of actors (see profile Sandra Bullock as example), since the head is described as an "introduction than can stand alone". Also, "Best known works" are most of the time a matter of opinion and works that help to describe an artist shouldn´t be limited. Then, I took out Natsudoko again, because he was not a particapant there last Summer, only a Guest Star for 2 days, so that DVD shouldn´t belong to his official DVDs since there are merely 2 minutes of him in the footage. Also, using paragraphs helps to make the layout cleaner and a lot easier to read.


91.3.65.149 (talk) 07:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)



Hi Vera,

his parts in the named TV Series are important, as stated in his japanese Wikipedia Article. These shows are choosen, because they were Golden Time (Primetime) Shows and in general important just for that. Otherwise would his part in Rocket Boys have been his first big part, not as Kikumaru, after your argumentation. I don´t see a problem with listing MAJOR Works of an artist, that´s why I will keep his major works so far in his head and add "Tumbling" later too. Also, yes, Koizora, Atanshini no Danshi, and even Otomen were shows that had/reached a broader audience (and more fans) than a stage play like Tenimyu and a Tokusatsu show like Kamen Rider, again because they are Primetime Series and his parts in there were main parts. I made the change to his family name. And the use of paragraphs isn´t out of the Wikipedia guidelines. It´s okay to use them, but for now I can change it.

91.3.65.149 (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Type_C.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Type_C.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


Non-free use disputed for File:Ualbum.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ualbum.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:YuuShirotaTezuka.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:YuuShirotaTezuka.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:WithU.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:WithU.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:YangPeiAn.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:YangPeiAn.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:YangPeiAnAlbum1.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:YangPeiAnAlbum1.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:YangPeiAnAlbum4.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:YangPeiAnAlbum4.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:YangPeiAnAlbum2.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:YangPeiAnAlbum2.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:YangPeiAnAlbum4.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:YangPeiAnAlbum4.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:PrinceofTennisFilmOST.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PrinceofTennisFilmOST.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:ROM-4CD.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:ROM-4CD.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:KujiariKousukeReady.jpg[edit]

I have tagged File:KujiariKousukeReady.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Osamu Adachi[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Osamu Adachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP lack of any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FiendYT 06:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Vera26. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Osamu Adachi[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Osamu Adachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor; only available sources are IMDB, fan wikis, etc. Fails WP:NACTOR as well as WP:FNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Vera26. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)