User talk:Vietlong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Welcome to Wikipedia!





Hello Vietlong and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

*The five pillars of Wikipedia

*How to edit a page

*Help pages

*Tutorial

*How to write a great article

*Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Welcome!

Take careEncyclopedist (talk)Wednesday, April 24, 2024, 16:01

For you excellent contributions here! εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your map[edit]

I love your map of Vietnam, I've made a lot of maps myself, but I wanted to know, what two fonts did you use? Thanks. :) --Golbez 07:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have only edited and created a new version of the map available on Wikipedia. It may be originated from Website Vietnamtourism.--Vietlong 16:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VietnameseProvincesMap edited.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 02:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have created, e.g. made corrections (because of division of provinces) from the old version of this file, having existed in English Wikipedia. The old version is not correct in regard to new boundaries between provinces after their division. I think the its source is in website of Vietnamtourism ( with extension of .org.vn?). so there is no problem in copyright. --Vietlong 16:27, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:LocationVietnamLaiChau2.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have created, e.g. made corrections from the old file in English Wikipedia. Similar files are in each article of Vietnam provinces, such as An Giang, Bac Lieu. the only work I made is to change the color of the provinces in concern. --Vietlong 16:34, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Thank you for noticing the errors between Ideopsis vulgaris and Ideopsis similis. I have placed the articles in correct perspective now but in doing so I have had to revert your redirects of Ideopsis spp. Butterflies of India are a large (1000 spp) subproject which are all referenced by scientific name except in case of European butterflies. In case you are a first time contributor on butterflies, a good place to visit is WikiProject Lepidoptera. Welcome to Wikipedia! AshLin 13:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vietlong, I'd like to invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam. If you'd like to contribute in any way to Vietnam-related articles, please add your name under "Participants," a little way down the page. Best, Badagnani 18:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:VietnameseProvincesMap edited2.png

Hi there... I was emailed by someone who would like to use this image... however you didn't provide any information about the image in in the page description. Can you update it for us? It would be very helpfull! thanks, ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 19:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ninh Binh2.png[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ninh Binh2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 02:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Vietnam[edit]

Hello Mr. VietLong ! Please join WikipediaProject Vietnam to contribute Vietnam-related topics. Thank you very much.Genghiskhanviet (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help to translate from Vietnamese!! Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article request[edit]

Would you mind creating a short stub for the en:Houston Independent School District at vi:Khu Học Chánh Houston?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Poecilotriccus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flycatcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fête[edit]

Do you know fête is pronounced "fight" in Quebec French ? Fête (talk) 23:26, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? --Vietlong (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See here please : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te69JK28DDo Fête (talk) 10:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kỳ quá ? Fête (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

giọng Québec[edit]

Người Québec chocolat đọc "so-co-lo", fort đọc "phao", kilomètre đọc "ki-lo-mấy". Fête (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Politics of Anhui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Bin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of honeyeaters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Papua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Golden puddle frog[edit]

Hello, you recently moved Phrynobatrachus auritus to golden puddle frog. In my opinion this was not a good move. According to the WP:NCFAUNA, the most common name should be used, which in this case would be "eared river frog" (based on Google hits, with a large margin). However, again by a good margin, the scientific name is much more used. It is not wrong to use the common name, but I think that the scientific names are the best page titles for species with obscure and little used common names. Common names can be used as redirects. This has been discussed many times, and although the plant project has chosen this as their guideline, there is no overwhelming consensus to support this view for animals. Cheers, Micromesistius (talk) 20:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your opinion. While I worked over a Vietnamese translation of The Natural History Book, published by DK, 2010, I saw that Phrynobatrachus auritus has [only] common name "golden puddle frog" (p. 364), and Wikipedia didn't give its common names, so I added this common name to the Wikipedia's article for easy reference. I think they have chosen this common name because it's the most popular name. Cheers, --Vietlong (talk) 08:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I search, "eared river frog" has 7 results, including 4 "Big-eared River Frog" (Thoropa megatympanum), so the net results are only 3, compared with 4 results of "golden puddle frog". If you see that was not a good move, you can revert and add these common names to this species. --Vietlong (talk) 08:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gomphrena globosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edit. --Vietlong (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Vietlong. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Vietlong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WP:BIRD[edit]

Hello Vietlong, given your interest in editing bird articles, may I invite you to join the WikiProject Birds. There is a wealth of resources on the project page and frequent discussion topics on the associated project talk pages including taxonomy standards and reference links. If you have any additional questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice. --Vietlong (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Vietlong. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hispa[edit]

Hi Vietlong,

I see that you created the article Hispa with no references. I tried to find a reference, and found this book: Leschen, Richard A. B.; Beutel, Rolf G. (2014). Morphology and Systematics: Phytophaga. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110274462. Retrieved 27 November 2018.

I'm not an expert in the material, and it's not clear to me whether that source solidly supports your assertion in the article. Is Hispa really a genus? It seems to me that it's a tribe. --Slashme (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice.
I am sure that Hispa is a genus, not a tribe. If it's a a tribe, it's name ends in -ini, e.g. Hispini. You can see the following links to assure yourself:
1 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hispa
2 https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=qt8zDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA387&lpg=PA387&dq=Hispa+a+genus&source=bl&ots=kkHJzd8EgI&sig=NjR4mfY1NeOTpoKvmBFgZuwTzDg&hl=vi&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0ho7zuvTeAhXFq48KHS9GBdcQ6AEwA3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=Hispa%20a%20genus&f=false| Chrysomeloidea
3 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267861126_Hispa_tarsata_a_new_species_from_Iran_Coleoptera_Chrysomelidae_Hispinae| Hispa tarsata, a new species from Iran (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Hispinae)
4 https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hispini
I wanted to insert the taxonomy box into the article but didn't manage. --Vietlong (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]