User talk:Viewmont Viking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I like pineapples! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leafsfan1986 (talkcontribs) 01:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 23:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

To the best of my knowledge, there are some inaccurate details on the page. Keeping in mind the interest of Wikipedia (to have the most updated, accurate information) we have set out to make sure that the these interests are filled. I would be happy to send you the draft of what we had, and you are welcome to make adjustments where necessary, but we would like to have the page corrected and updated with the changes. Lgallas (talk) 21:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Lgallas, Viking wanted you to post on the article's talk page, not their own talk page. Primefac (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The link is here. Happy Squirrel(Please let me know how to improve!) 21:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi there Why are you deleting facts that are true on an actor? B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


This user has requested a change of username, I could not find anything promotional via a Google search, could you please expound on the username violation. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Mlpearc This user created an article by the name of Ship Space apparently it is a maritime museum in Scotland. VVikingTalkEdits 00:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem - VVikingTalkEdits 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me about my username. I have changed it and placed my article on my talk page for proofreading. Could you please proofread it for me? PabloRicardo (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


[1] Thanks for the help, sir, and for ensuring that editing WP sucks for most people. Have a nice day. Cla68 (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

How to protect a Wikipedia page ?[edit]

I want to protect a Wikipedia page such that no one can edit it how to do it and what are the steps involved in it Thekingofrings (talk) 06:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

See response on my talk page. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 07:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Teen Mania International[edit]

Hello, Viewmont Viking. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Teen Mania International".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 07:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Definition of habitat[edit]

Aside from the fact that I fail to see what isn't objective about "held in captivity", it's a fact. They are not living there out of the own free will, are they? Anyway, my last edit changing "habitats" to tanks was also rejected? Please explain why, especially given my justification in light of the accepted definition of habitat? In its current form "habitat" is misleading as it implies some for, of natural environment. Thank you Wuunce (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I already answered you, Habitat is the correct verbiage to explain the location that animals live in, in a zoological setting. i.e., An environment created for an animal to live in. VVikingTalkEdits 22:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
There is normally more than one definition of a word. VVikingTalkEdits 22:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Our own opinions are irrelevant. We follow the sources and the source for this information calls them tanks repeatedly, as does the LA times. SmartSE (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
LA Times [2]. Third paragraph down. Habitat is the most widely used verbiage for an animal's living space at zoological facilities. VVikingTalkEdits 23:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
That's not the source cited though is it and they use tanks 5 times vs habitat twice. You're now at 3RR btw. SmartSE (talk) 23:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
I know, I wasn't going to revert again. What I am saying is in the industry it is Habitat, yes it is 5 vs two in my example of the LA Times, however I was showing that even the LA Times states habitat. That is the industry standard.
Isn't it nice to be the last one to be able to edit, you should have stopped because of WP:BRD. I opened a section on the talk page. Please us it.VVikingTalkEdits 23:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you both for the lively debate. I don't know when I will be back on like I was today. I had an oddly slow day today. You know my take on the matter now do what the community thinks is best. VVikingTalkEdits 23:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


Information icon Hello, I'm Kendrick7. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Kendrick7talk 02:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Let's Agree that' Wikipedia is not the place for "OPINIONS"[edit]

Please ensure that if you make contributions to articles they do not in any way shape or form represent your own beliefs, but are based solely on CURRENT research. Citing studies from the early 1900's (when people still believed it was okay to enslave others) is not beneficial to readers and can be misleading.

  • The truth shall set you free*

Teepee87 (talk) 16:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Teepee87

You are correct this is not the place for opinions, which is why I am not relying on Primary Sources and taking them out of context or completely changing what is actually said. --VVikingTalkEdits 17:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Jabalpur Engineering College's "notable" alumni[edit]

I have read the policies on notability and stand-alone lists, and these people are notable according to them. I suggest you should also read them carefully before reverting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I will not further revert as I am not inclined to edit war over this issue. Especially with an IP address that can just change again. If you really don't want these to be reverted again create an article on each of these people, therefore showing their notability. If they are not notable enough for an article they are not notable enough to be listed. --VVikingTalkEdits 19:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

The individuals don't need their own articles, at least that's what wiki's current / latest policy says. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

speedy deletion tag on Johnny Orlando[edit]

I changed your db-person tagging to db-attack, to blank the page. It was an attack page, and we should not continue to display the content until it is deleted (which sometimes can take a long while). All the best, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Why are you deleting true fact info[edit]

…on my page of an actor. This information is true and correct. It can all be backed up. So why are you deleting it? B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Sure thing. Thanks for the extra information. It just that I've seen others with less body of work and that she deserved one. One new to this page too. B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for typos seems this page doesn't like IOS as, as I type the reply box is behind keyboard. Best B B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

  • See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Wikipedia is imperfect. There are many things 'wrong' here. We can't presume that because something else is here that we can therefore have something. WP:ENT is the guiding principle here, not whether something else exists. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

GNU_Privacy_Guard Application support[edit]

Hello, Mr.Viking! Please do not delete one of the application supporting GnuPG from the list. I talk about WinGPG — a free encryption tool based on open source GnuPG public-key cryptography with simple yet powerful interface. It is placed on official pgp site: This information make the article more useful for the readers. If you find the description not too encyclopedic I can try to re-wright it. Thank you in advance Sc.pashkevich.artem (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

RE: Nick B. Nicholaou article[edit]

We are still working on the references, and how to have them done this week or next. Please remove your proposal to remove the article. NNicholaou (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Who are WE? Are you working with others to creating this article? Please see Sock and Meat. In addition COI would be a good place to start and Autobiography would be good to read. I honestly think this should be a speedy delete but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. User:NNicholaou Pinging you so you get this. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

We refers to the help I'm being given by one of my publishers and my staff to appropriately add the references.NNicholaou (talk) 14:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I have intentionally written the article in a third voice and endeavored to be neutral and factual. The article contains many outside links to confirm the validity of the facts stated, and I am working on the References section. This seems to satisfy the overall goal desired in avoiding self-authorship. I hope you agree.NNicholaou (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

There is so much wrong with your editing. You created an Autobiography so clearly you have a COI, you do not pass the Notability guidelines for a person. You have Spammed other articles with external links to you. It doesn't matter if you try to keep the article neutral and written in the third person the truth is you are writing outside the guidelines of Wikipedia. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)