User talk:Viewmont Viking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 23:30, 10 June 2012

Speedy deletion contested: Cougars (band)[edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Cougars (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "embarked on several extensive US and European tours" is enough for A7 not to apply. Thank you. BangJan1999 14:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GCLS Updates Deleted[edit]

I’m writing to ask that my recent edits to the Wikipedia page of the Golden Crown Literary Society, a nonprofit organization, be restored. I want to assure you that GCLS is an all volunteer organization in which I have no financial interest and benefit financially from in no way. GCLS recently received a restricted grant from a charitable organization for its Goldie Awards and, as I am not an author and am nearly 75-years-old, I can again assure you that I will not benefit financially for this grant.

Rather, I’m working with a volunteer committee to revise the seriously outdated GCLS Wikipedia page to reflect recent changes in the organization’s mission, goals and objectives, and Goldie Awards. Time is of the essence because we expect widespread publicity after the new cash prizes are announced on August 21. We expect newcomers to turn to Wikipedia for information and we want that information to be complete, accurate and up to date.

To accomplish this, I created a personal Wikipedia account last week and began making updates little by little as I learned how to do so. Then I turned to more extensive updating as I became more efficient, finally learning how to use footnotes and references. I was very careful to indicate either “a minor change” or a “watch this page” for all revisions. I was so happy with my progress through yesterday but now all my edits have been reversed. As stated above, I’m appealing to you to restore my updates at your earliest convenience so I can complete the process prior to August 21.

Given that I have a Ph.D. in Mass Communications from Indiana University and spent 27 years as director of research for a major newspaper company, I understand the importance of accurate reporting and thorough source documentation. Please note that the source for most of the needed updates is, in fact, GCLS’s website, which fulfills Wikipedia requirements that information be accessible to others. There is a dearth of information from such sources as journals, books and newspaper, given the nature of the information.

Thank you for your kind attention and I look forward to a speedy resolution of this matter.

V.F. Dodge V.F. Dodge (talk) 11:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elm information security[edit]

hi,

I hope you are healthy,

Why did you cancel my modifications? You can check them through the web or through the company's website. أحمد بن مساعد (talk) 13:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article Name[edit]

hello,

can you changing the name of the company from Elm Information Security to Elm Company, according to the company's website "https://elm.sa/en/Pages/default.aspx", The name was changed in 2020. أحمد بن مساعد (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maturity Model[edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking,

I recently added a maturity model (PEMM - Process and Enterprise Maturity Model) to the Maturity Model page. You removed it for being advertisement, which really surprised me. The reason I added the model is due to my process management study program at the University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria where I learned about the model. Right now I am writing a thesis about maturity models and I simply wanted to add that one to the page (just for completeness). What was the reason for classifying it as advertisement?

Currently I am researching and writing about maturity models in general and I would alter the description of maturity model according to my findings (as it even has already been mentioned in the article talk and I already know that the description is not accurate). What do I have to consider so my correction would stick?

Thanks in advance!

AloisMan (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Response: You may have noticed I removed all model's that did not have a bluelink. If you create an article on your preferred model(s) and submit it for review, if the article is approved you can add that model back into the article. Wikipedia requires notability, not just some random person's thoughts. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added the creators homepage with details about it (compared to the other models that had no reference whatsoever). There is even an article about the model in Harvard Business Review (a bit outdated, but still). I currently don't prefer this model above any other model. I knew about the model and saw that the article lacked the mention of it, so I wanted to add it. I don't know if "some random person's thoughts" is sufficient to describe my addition.
Yet I do understand the bluelink-approach and thank you for your response and information. AloisMan (talk) 14:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

InsideBlue[edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking, would be interested why my addition of InsideBlue to the Lazarus IDE page has been rejected. It's an open-source tool done with Lazarus IDE much like the other tools in the section "Examples of applications produced with Lazarus". Thanks. LinsErik (talk) 10:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Viewmont Viking[edit]

You recently reverted my first use of a hashtag in twitter. Saying it was poorly sourced. Could you help me improve it instead of removing it? I am kind of new in Wikipedia and I can use the help of someone more experienced. I didn't quote my first tweet with hashtag since it is in spanish, so I picked one in english that is also previous to the messina one. Thanks in advance Htmllife (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:SEICA (company) - deleted speedy notice[edit]

I deleted the speedy tag. Let's give the guy some time. It's in draft space so it's doing no harm.

This company is a player in its niche so an article in main space should go to AfD to be deleted.

Thanks for caring about our content.

--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 16:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: User:Aronss123[edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of User:Aronss123, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A11 is only used for mainspace articles. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, then what about Webhost?

Longmeadow High School Field Hockey[edit]

Why did you undo the Field Hockey addition? All factual information has been obtained from http://nebula.wsimg.com/4914942d5fe7ce3688638a31736f9c78?AccessKeyId=32611F8B0EAAD3ED7D41&disposition=0&alloworigin=1 and http://miaa.ezstream.com/index.cfm?ChnID=320&SubID=-1&chncd=320,-1&Org=MIAA&CFID=13695738&CFTOKEN=ab538653a472da3-990BAF2F-D445-A1F6-783C674A4EB6F49B Adriatic20 (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lighthouse page edit help please[edit]

Hi Viewmont Viking,

As a rookie Wikipaedian, I’d like to ask for your help!

You reverted my edit to the Lighthouse page over the weekend quoting the ‘Manual of Style’ and I would like to know what specifically I did wrong so I can improve my edit. Any help you can share would be appreciated.

(Link to Lighthouse revision history edit page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lighthouse_(British_organisation)&action=history )

I’ve also had another go at writing a more encyclopaedic entry and would like your feedback on it please, before making another edit:

“Following allegations about Lighthouse made in the UK based newspaper, The Daily Mail in April 2022, the south african newspaper the Saturday Star interviewed chairman Paul Waugh who stated he was taking legal action against the Daily Mail.”

(And then link to this article as before)

https://www.iol.co.za/saturday-star/news/life-coaching-group-run-by-south-africans-in-the-uk-accused-of-abusing-exploiting-and-fleecing-victims-9a70af39-9b03-4db0-a5dd-eb8bd69b341f

Many thanks for your help!

TCH TCHasker (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bear in mind that Hasker features in the BBC documentary. The BBC documentary claims Hasker would loiter outside members' bedrooms such that one had to escape and get help from the local Police. Charming fella this Hasker! Nofoolie (talk) 10:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your deletion of my Cash Converters edit[edit]

Hello, Viewmont Viking. I don't see why you deleted my edit on the page for 'Cash Converters' about DankPods. I don't see any problem, I didn't write a lot about it, and I made sure to use proper language. Similarly, I stuck to the truth and I don't understand what I got wrong.


And looking around your page, it appears you've deleted quite a bit about sports. Why were you drawn to Cash Converters? And why do you think this was necessary? Have you watched these? Do you have a problem with DankPods' work? Or- this is a long shot- do you find pleasure in deleting and undoing Wikipedia changes?


I'm not mad, just curious. What'd I do? LiVano LaCole (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so it appears that you consider it advertisement. But I didn't intend it to be advertising. After all, I have no relations to this YouTuber, and anyway from what I've gathered, he's made it popular. I am a student, so there isn't a good reason for me to advertise him. If you look up 'cash converters' on Google-
You see that I was a bit biased to the term 'Cashies'. However, I was innocently incorrect. Sorry LiVano LaCole (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 87.200.229.168 (talk) 17:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spam link?[edit]

Explain to me how a link to Amazon for two books I want to cite is a spam link? What sort of link would you find acceptable? Kolonahskapee (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jay Prabha Medanta Super Specialty Hospital, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Education Commission[edit]

Hello there, I see you have deleted my submission for the Education Commission in Hong Kong. I want to know why you deleted this. This entry was created by 3 other students (plus myself) as part of our university studies (HKU) in which we were tasked to create and upload a wikipedia page. Since the previous entry on the Education Commission was lacking content, we thought to add to this. Please let me know what concerns you have and if you would like to add anything to our submission. ArdaVeysi (talk) 03:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit cancelled[edit]

Hello,

Could you assist me in updating the Stop TB Partnership page? The information is quite incomplete and outdated. I don't think the edit I have made are self promoting but if they are kindly suggest a better way to present it? I also find it peculiar that the article states that the information is outdated, yet whenever it is edited by people it is consistently struck down.

Any help would be greatly appreciated... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.161.225.252 (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Viewmont Viking can you help me update the outdated info of the page on wikipedia? If I create language versions of the page will they also be removed? GeGki (talk) 10:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All the information has been provided to you on your talk page already. --VVikingTalkEdits 15:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Viewmont Viking Thanks for the reply. I am new to Wikipedia so I am not sure I understand the info given correctly. Do I need to submit a draft to you for review? If yes, would mind pointing me to some info on how to do this? GeGki (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are many individuals who have the patience and desire to adopt new users. I have neither the patience nor the desire to help people promote their organization. For a faster answer you can always ask at the Teahouse. --VVikingTalkEdits 15:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Viewmont Viking got ya! However, I believe it's important to prioritize the most current and accurate information, especially on critical topics like disease prevention, in this case tuberculosis. This ensures that the public encyclopedia remains a reliable and up-to-date resource for everyone. GeGki (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Education Commission of Hong Kong[edit]

Hello. I am a professor at the University of Hong Kong whose students wrote the Education Commission update that you deleted. I checked their original entry and found that the biographies of the Commission leadership could be considered promotional. The summaries of the Commission publications, without proper contextualisation referencing public and industry reactions, could also be considered promotional. We will resubmit after revising these parts of the entry. Feel free to respond to the student posting on your talk page if there are other outstanding issues. 119.237.167.185 (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing MK-84 article[edit]

Hi Viewmont Viking. Thanks for your comment on the MK-84 talk page. I tried to reply but not sure i tagged you properly so leaving a note here. Fyi more evidence on the bombs use in Gaza was published yesterday in the NYT. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/21/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-bomb-investigation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.H00.DkyY.tLf6R8Fylful&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare Thanks for your attention and engagement. Greg S Gregsmith14 (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fabric[edit]

I am not sure why you keep reverting my edits. Please discuss any issues with me. The sentence I moved was better under the closure section and the sentence that I removed was redundant, because obviously there is already info there about the drug issues.Chromozine (talk) 18:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My biggest issue was your initial edit summary and you trying to whitewash the article. Your initial edit summary only stated you moved a sentence not that you also removed a sentence that portrayed the article in a negative light. This to me showed an attempt to hide that portion of the edit. In addition you should follow BRD and also [[WP:OWN|own], probably also 3RR.--VVikingTalkEdits 18:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please check now, I moved it again. Whoever initially posted that sentence obviously didn't see that there is a whole section about the Closure and placed it out of context.
I think my latest edits will clarify that the removed sentence was redundant. Chromozine (talk) 19:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At this point I am not going to make any additional edits to that article at this time. Please do review the information I shared as it will help prevent additional conflicts with other editors, Thank you for your contributions. --VVikingTalkEdits 19:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of antivirus software[edit]

Hi Viewmont Viking,

Could you please clarify the reason you have removed my editing to this list of Antivirus software - I've included 2 links from GeekWire and StorageReview magazines with the references to this DriveSecurity Antivirus.

Please clarify. Alexledit (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to pyroluria section of the Orthomolecular Psychiatry page[edit]

Hello Viewmont Viking,

I recently made an edit to the pyroluria section of the Orthomolecular Psychiatry page on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthomolecular_psychiatry). My edit was intended to update the section with recent research findings, supported by two articles from recognized scientific journals and a comprehensive post citing a range of further scholarly articles.

I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and accuracy of Wikipedia content and appreciate the role of experienced editors in this process.

I would be grateful if you could provide specific feedback or reasons for the reversion of my edit. My intention was to contribute valuable and credible information, with a focus on the most recent research findings, adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability and neutrality. If there were any issues with the content or sources of my edit, I would welcome your guidance to improve my contribution.

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

BingBing88 BingBing88 (talk) 01:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Viewmont Viking,
I'm following up on my previous message regarding the edit I made to the Pyroluria section of the Orthomolecular Psychiatry page. I haven't received a response yet and would greatly appreciate your feedback or reasons for reverting the edit. BingBing88 (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BingBing88: I mostly write on Swedish‑language Wikipedia; I hope it is acceptable on English‑language Wikipedia’s discussion pages to reply to a question that was addressed to somebody else.
I shall give you an answer, BingBing88. Your edit in Orthomolecular psychiatry will always be reverted, because it is not “credible information”. It is easy to show that your motivation (posted 01:48, 3 January 2024 UTC) for your edit is wrong. One of your references is the paper ”Pyrroles as a Potential Biomarker for Oxidative Stress Disorders”. The first author is Brett Lambert. His affiliation is Applied Analytical Laboratories, Logandowns Dr, Meadowbrook, QLD 4131, Australia. If one reads Applied Analytical Laboratories’ own presentation, one quickly realises that they are doing pseudoscience.
There’s no point discussing this with you. Please don’t continue the discussion. I shall only state what all knowledgeable, scientifically minded people think: Orthomolecular psychiatry is pseudoscience; you apparently believe in pseudoscience; all your past and future edits that make pseudoscientific claims, as if they had any merit, should and will be deleted without discussion (I write this single discussion post out of courtesy). Your beliefs will probably not change, but I kindly inform you that you will never be able to get this kind of edits accepted in Wikipedia, so you might as well give up now. Jan Arvid Götesson (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Viewmont Viking: How are you? I removed the airmail reference from the article, which you strangely reverted without any knowledge of the previous state of this spam BLP article. You don't need to a take a reference to a reliable sources noticeboard to know that it is junk. It looks and reads like a clickbait site. I've worked at Afc, NPP and coin for years and know how to check a news site for validity. It may be hybrid right enough, doing that to ensure it survives but still doesn't read or look right. That reference was used to prove build an attack section with no collaborating references to ensure that WP:NPOV was being followed. The thing is completely unbalanced. You should have taken it to the reliable sources noticeboard at the time instead of leaving that junk in. I'll kick it off today and if its good it go in. I've taken it out in the meantime. scope_creepTalk 09:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am stepping out of that article, however I vehemently disagree with many of your points and more so the points of the SPA editor. Airmail was taken the the RSN and no decision was made, however at least one editor, who appears not to be involved, stated it was reliable, it is also ran by the same editors who used to run vanity fair. Second I reverted it back to where you left. The SPA then came in and removed additional information. I did not include the attack section I left that out. Just because an reference is negative does not mean it is junk, again that was not determined and while I respect all seasoned editors I believe your "I know it is junk so it is junk" attitude does not help the argument. Again I will not edit the article again I believe the current SPA editor is a sock of previous editors, I believe the article is being whitewashed by someone close to the subject of the article and it doesn't sit well with me. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Viewmont Viking, thanks for trying to prevent the whitewashing of the Amar Singh page seemingly by SPAs. Air mail is a real, award-winning publication - see its win in the Deadline Club's 2023 awards (awarded by the Society of Professional Journalists) NYhttps://www.deadlineclub.org/2023-award-winners/ .
The Vanity Fair articles that are quoted in the article praising Amar Singh's work are no longer live, suggesting they have been pulled in the wake of Airmail's article about Amar Singh - https://airmail.news/issues/2023-10-14/the-grift-the-prince-and-the-twist 2600:1003:B002:2349:7010:2E11:27A3:24C0 (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate Truffle[edit]

Hi @Viewmont Viking, I saw you reverted my edit in this article. What do you mean by "possible spam"? Gemdira (talk) 15:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of crucial information.[edit]

You keep on deleting important information on Khyber Medical College and labelling it as promotional. How is it promotional? Is stating facts promotional? I even provided suitable sources. And this is the kind of information everyone looks for in a medical school (in our country at least). What you deem promotional may be extremely important information to someone else. ExoField (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I know it's important because it is the same information me and my friends were looking for before finding it on this Wikipedia page. Now all of it is gone. ExoField (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a webhost...yes it is gone because it is not encyclopedic, the information I removed is find for the schools website, but not for an encyclopedia. Now I ask you to please stay off my talk page as I don't appreciate being called an idiot, especially from someone who does not know the processes and policies of Wikipedia. In addition you may wish to review WP:3RR since you are close to violating it.--VVikingTalkEdits 21:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but why have you removed it now? Why not years before? And yes a lot of information is still on the school's website, only the key points have been written on the wiki page, and accomodation is definitely a key point.
Besides information of accomodation is present on many universities, colleges and schools' Wikipedia pages. ExoField (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you nice to stay off of my talk page. I am now telling you, unless you have a need to add something to my talk page, i.e., a notice board notification or something similar do not come to my talk page again. --VVikingTalkEdits 21:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sat Jan 27: Utah Wikipedia Day![edit]

Interested in celebrating Wikipedia Day in Park City during Sundance?

If you are interested in our Utah Wikipedia Day celebration on Saturday, January 27, 2024, please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/Utah/Wikipedia Day 2024 to add your response.
Not in the Utah area? Check the Wikipedia Day page for an event near you! ~~~~

Pharos (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI comment[edit]

Dear ‪@Viewmont Viking,
Recently you commented that my edit of the ILASS entry might be under conflict of interests.
I replied in the talk tab of the ILASS entry, but since I'm not sure that you got my reply (I'm a new contributor tot he Wikipedia), I'd like to reply here too.
I'd like to explain that ILASS is an academic, non-profit, organization, and I'm a scholar performing research in the research areas related to spraying systems, and an old member, but in no-way a paid member, and in no way am I paid to edit this entry.

Additionally, my edits primarily focused on providing factual information and historical context.

Following your comment I've stated that in the talk tab of the entry.
Thus, I think this should not be considered as a COI .
I'd appreciate your reply and advice.
Kindly,
PeacEng

PeacEng (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding in the talk page that you do have a COI. Individuals who have a COI whether they are being paid or not, whether the organization is for profit or not for profit, often have a difficult time writing about the organization in a neutral fashion. Your edits had that issue. Please recommend your edits on the talk page utilizing the tools I shared with you on your talk page. In addition Wikipedia is not concerned with what the organization says about itself. We look at what 3rd party Reliable Sources say about the organization.--VVikingTalkEdits 15:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so just to make sure that I understood you correctly, your advice is to place my edits, not in the article tab, but rather in the talk tab? PeacEng (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irvingship building[edit]

can you explain in a little more detail than "Multiple manual of style issues, external links in body of article etc" as to why you deleted a whole weeks worth of work? Kabiblehopper (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He’s done this multiple times on a page I’ve worked on, also hours of work and research just deleted with zero explanation Above48degrees (talk) 03:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trego, Montana[edit]

What is the fixation with deleting massive swaths of info on this page? You’ve done this previously and I don’t understand what the issue is this time except you deleted hours of work and research.

do tell… Above48degrees (talk) 03:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Large amounts of unsourced, narrative, information does not belong on an encyclopedia please review WP:BRD--VVikingTalkEdits 14:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the unsourced narrative? All of the things listed have actual, verifiable sources, found either in hardcopy text or readily on the internet... Above48degrees (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JD Irving[edit]

Once again you have baselessly accused me of COI, and refused to engage in conversation on the talk page. As your own talk page shows you seem to consistently engaging in edit warring/disruptive editing on other article without engaging in consensus.

Unless you can prove the irving group of companies is indeed a real company, and address the evidence stated within the talk page of the article, that illustrates it indeed is not a real company, Im going to have to ask you to stop disruptively editing the page with false information. Kabiblehopper (talk) 11:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I accused you of a COI was before I read that you stated you didn't have one. I have nearly 50,000 edits I have only been blocked from editing one time and that was in error so do not state that I am consistently engaging in disruptive editing, as the facts do not show that is the case. Now I as you to stay off my talk page as you have been uncivil to me on my talk page by baselessly claiming I am a consistently engaging in edit warring/disruptive editing. --VVikingTalkEdits 14:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]