--nids 23:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- user talk:Viscious81/Archive 1: July 2006 – August 2006
- user talk:Viscious81/Archive 2: September 2006 - Dec 2006
- user talk:Viscious81/Archive 3: January 2007 - February 2008
File:YV VSM.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:YV VSM.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
It looks like you're right. Firestone is considered a sociologist, even though she has no academic background in sociology. I'm not sure she's worth discussing in the that section, however, since I'm sure there are many other exceptions, and the sentence is only meant to summarize the predominant mainstream viewpoint among sociologists. I worry that singling her out there would be giving her undue weight, especially since her book is over 40 years ago. I don't have a string opinion about it though, so if you disagree, feel free to change it back. Kaldari (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of books banned by governments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Nomination of Hinduphobia for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduphobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GoldenRing (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)