User talk:Voxfax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I want to make me blue.--Voxfax (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Carl Fabergé may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Peter Carl Fabergé''', also known as "Karl Gustavovich Fabergé" ({{lang-ru|Карл Густавович Фаберже}} ''Karl Gustavovich Faberzhe'', (May 30, 1846 - September 24,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


"Engineer" is sufficient. His engineering skills were diverse and certainly not limited to military purposes. He designed stage machinery, automatons and flying machines. Why narrow the field, in the context of introduction?

Amandajm (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay. You're right. Thank you. --Voxfax (talk) 12:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miklós Horthy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • He is greeted by city officials in front of the Gellert Hotel]] The Romanian army retreated from Budapest on 14 November, leaving Horthy to enter the city, where

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@BracketBot: Thanks for the notice. I had really a mistake. Voxfax (talk) 12:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Morris Warman article[edit]

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this person is notable, meaning covered enough in media to write a fair article on them, the article may get deleted.

Are there any reliable sources (ones not written by or for this person) you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 06:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Blythwood: I'm a Hungarian with very poor English knowledge. I find as source this [1], after I'd written the Herbert Kupferberg's article, but I'am affraid change the original text. Would you be so kind, please, help me to correct it for not offend author's rights? Voxfax (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herbert Kupferberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National Observer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Freed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richard Freed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. noq (talk) 09:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Terrible sorry! I've many difficulties with English language, so I'm afraid to have mistakes in editing. I marked it out for begins. I just try to change for acceptable text. Please some more patience. Thank you. Voxfax (talk) 10:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Voxfax. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution[edit]

It appears that you have added material to the article Batthyány's sanctuary lamp using content from the Magyar wiki. While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original author(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed web pages, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. It's also a good idea to place a note on the article along with your citation. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied licensed material before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Batthyány's sanctuary lamp[edit]


a translation rész üres marad megjelenítve, habár látom a forrásban hogy a magyar forrásra utal...kérdés meg lehet-e oldani hogy látszódjon valami, vagy ha nem, nem jobb ha kitöröljük az üres translation részt? Üdv(KIENGIR (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC))


Keresem a megfelelő template-et, kértem Dianna szerkesztőtársat is, hogy segítsen, mert magam nem találtam. A hu.wikin a fordítás|language|titel|oldid működik. Tudsz segíteni? Üdv. Voxfax (talk) 02:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@Borsoka:, tudsz Voxfaxnak segíteni az ügyben? (én még templatekben nem vagyok profi). Köszi (KIENGIR (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC))
Sajnos, nem. Én is csak keveset használok. Borsoka (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Page move of Gedeon Richter Plc.[edit]

Hello! Thanks for your recent (March 16) move of the article Gedeon Richter Co. to Gedeon Richter Plc. I agree, that's more precise. However, the acronym for public limited company is a bit odd, probably owing to its use in legal contexts, and is preferred as lowercase "plc" with no period (this according to the The Guardian style guide and the language reference desk – also the Manual of Style, though I did that update myself.) I suspect people write it "Plc." after a company name because they're used to this format with "Ltd." (for limited company). Most companies seem to use it lower-case as it has to appear that way on legal documents. I'm looking at typographic conformity across articles and the majority have it lowercase, and it seems to be purely a style issue. I'd like to move the article to "Gedeon Richter plc" but thought I'd best check with you in case "Plc." has a special use in Hungary. Please let me know your opinion. Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and moved the page Gedeon Richter Plc. → Gedeon Richter plc – Reidgreg (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)