User talk:WDGraham/July 2014

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
59 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Timeline of biotechnology (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
577 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B YUV (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Skynet 5A (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub JCSAT-5A (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start DirecTV-5 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
42 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ariane Passenger Payload Experiment (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Soyuz T-4 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,386 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ultra high definition television (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
41 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Radarsat-1 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub UGATUSAT (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
33 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Xichang Satellite Launch Center (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Spaceway-3 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
26 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Stub Air-augmented rocket (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
38 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start US-A (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
230 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Atmospheric entry (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
109 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Multispectral image (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
145 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Attitude control (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Unmanned spaceflight (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
205 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Somaly Mam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
12 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Expedition 25 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Soyuz TM-33 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
12 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Japan's space development (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eslam El Karbal (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Average accounting return (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Nimiq-4 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eutelsat 21B (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eutelsat 36A (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
38 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Jonathan Russell (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 186 and Kosmos 188 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 434 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Spaceflight template

You have recommended to use spaceflight infobox template instead of spacecraft infobox template. But i found spaceflight template too complex and unnecessary. Why to bother creating such over-universal templates?--Trurle (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

It isn't over-universal and it is no more complex than the other one apart from having more fields - by all means only use the ones you need. Ignorning community consensus on standards and doing your own thing is unhelpful as you are just creating work for the rest of us to bring it in line. --W. D. Graham 07:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Another barnstar for you

Bot operator's barnstar.png Bot Barnstar
For {{Orbit}} and AstRoBot

I came across the {{Orbit}} template. What a cool idea. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 02:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks --W. D. Graham 07:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 20:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Aeros 2 to AEROS (satellite)

FYI.

Regarding {{Orbital launches in 1974}}, corrected Wikilink Aeros 2 to AEROS (satellite) since it links to Ukrainian ultralight trike. Refer this edit. Kindly revert the edit, If required. Thanks! - Ninney (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

It's a complex case so I'll sort it out at some point in the future - Aeros 2 needs an article but I'm not sure where's best to put it. --W. D. Graham 19:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion closed. - Ninney (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
406 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Soyuz (spacecraft) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,918 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Moon landing (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Dominika Wolski (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
70 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start DirecTV satellite fleet (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
279 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Human spaceflight (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,905 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Moscow (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
229 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Chinese space program (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Azur (satellite) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
13 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Soyuz TM-28 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,625 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Satellite (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
456 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start OSCAR (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
678 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Space exploration (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
40 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Spacefaring (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
163 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Chess engine (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
78 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Cupola (ISS module) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ares V-Y (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
71 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start CGG (company) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
783 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Title (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Military Soyuz (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
100 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA SpaceX private launch site (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Kebena (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Asiemut (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Andrew D. Luster (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Abdullah Al-Saidawi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 7 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 9 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 140 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Zhukov Air and Space Defense Academy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Snedding (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 656 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

An article "first" for SpaceX (reprise)

Hey WD. We are just three days ahead of a SpaceX Falcon 9 launch, and for the first time, no one has created an article for the mission. If you look at List of Falcon 9 launches, there's no article at the link given (OG2 Mission 1) and the one I had thought I had seen somewhere else (Orbcomm OG2) is also still a red link. I don't know if something else exists, but if it does, it hasn't been picked up by the SpaceX-interested editors and put in the list of launches article.

I'm agnostic about the mission article. I don't personally care one way or the other if it gets created. However, the mission article was the norm for the old WP:LAUNCHES guideline, and they usually get created by someone for SpaceX flights, so we are in a bit new territory here.

The launch itself is however, once again, quite notable for the booster recovery tests that follow the booster ascent. It looks like they may actually recover their wet booster this time, as they seem to have succeeded in the soft ocean touchdown last time. Some time ago, I created a redir link for Falcon 9 Flight 10, and that currently points at the main Orbcomm sat constellation article.

So here is my novel thought: I'm thinking of going ahead and creating a launch article, and would just use Falcon 9 Flight 10 as the name, turning the redir into a stub article. However, since this is still rather different from the old order, and in fact, may be one of the first semi-normal launches to have its own article, I'd like to know:

  1. what you think about it?
  2. if you'd be willing to stop by after I get a stub up and help make the article more standard for WP launches?

Thanks. Look forward to your input. N2e (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  • I'd be inclined to see it a fairly routine launch, but as long as it doesn't replace the function of the payload article(s), doesn't exclude the possibility of future articles on the individual satellites (unlikely to be any time soon for Orbcomms but I'm concerned about the principle) and doesn't end up in {{Orbital launches in 2014}} or the payloads section of 2014 in spaceflight then I'd say create it at Falcon 9 Flight 10. When it was proposed a while back there was no opposition to replacing WP:LAUNCHES with User:WDGraham/Spaceflight notability; maybe now would be a good time to bring it back. --W. D. Graham 18:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the input. I don't know what I'll get done on it, as some non-wiki work has intervened. But if their is no Orbcomm G2 mission 1 article before the launch, I'll be inclined to create the one you mentioned as long as I have the time. Here is the press kit for OG2 M1: [1] Looks like that gives the official name SpaceX and O/ATK are calling the mission. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
If it is a launch article then the title should be rocket name, not payload/mission name. I would be very much opposed to any title with the word "Orbcomm" in it. --W. D. Graham 18:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I concur with you entirely on that point. I am assuming Falcon 9 Flight 10 if I create it. N2e (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── I finally created a stub launch article for this launch. Notable both for the (now) many delays and scrubs, as well as for the booster recovery effort. There is still no satellite mission article around, and the List of Falcon 9 launches table was getting overloaded with detail of the launch delays and (soon???) the launch.

I will keep working on the stub article. Expect it to change a lot. Cheers. N2e (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

So in keeping with our WProjSpaceflight evolving thinking on launch articles, and on sat articles, ...
Is the Falcon 9 Flight 10 article the first separate launch article in Wikipedia? Are there others based on notability of the launch itself, separate from articles about launchers that explode or are destroyed before reaching orbit? N2e (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
As far as I know, it's the first (excluding those that were merged/moved/split under the old guidelines). What we need to do next is put into place the framework which was developed to accommodate these articles - custom launch infobox, payload and object tables, etc. It's all still in my userspace somewhere so I'll get onto that tonight or tomorrow. --W. D. Graham 18:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Future NRO launches and rocket assignments

Hi. I think you would be interested in the discussion on the rocket assignments for some of the future launches of NRO payloads that are under bidding or not yet been released for bid in here: Talk:List of NRO Launches#NROL-79. Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 05:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Lakester (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
26 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Stub Comparison of communication satellite operators (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Satellite Business Systems (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
81 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Orbital spaceflight (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
89 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Comparison of Asian national space programs (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ginrei (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Explorer 3 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
55 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA COMSAT (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Vanguard 3 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
167 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B JAXA (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
1,338 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Thunderbolt (interface) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
1,062 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Indian Space Research Organisation (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
227 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Galileo (spacecraft) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
1,078 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Jeet Kune Do (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
137 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: FA Comparison of orbital launchers families (talk) 2.0 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
200 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Exploration of the Moon (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
111 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Heliocentric orbit (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start SupremeSAT (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
20 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Soyuz T-15 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
66 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start ISS ECLSS (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
93 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Venus Express (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Andlu (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Arennest (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub 4D Cityscape (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
19 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Katie Paterson (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
159 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alexander Gerst (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
1,267 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start SOLID (object-oriented design) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Penny floater (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kosmos 110 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub ELISA (satellite) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)