User talk:WTM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, WTM! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Marek.69 talk 03:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Diego Santa Cruz[edit]

Hi. Please check the references or external links in the articles before removing information, so you avoid doing errors in future similar to the one you did on Diego Santa Cruz article. I understand your doubts, but the external source Playerhistory clearly indicates he IS the brother of Roque, so it couldn´t possibly be "unsourced". The one that died in the car accident however was their 3th brother and that was mistakenly in the article and I added one source that explains that accident of their brother situation and also confirms that Diego is Roque´s brother. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 06:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, the website Playerhistory is considered to be among the most reliable among football websites. I also found the other source from the ABC journal that speaks about them being brothers. Curiously, back then when talking to a Croatian friend talking me about him and how they expected from him to be equally good as his brother (refering to Roque)... Anyway, after all this, I´m also having some doubts and there seems to be a some confusion about this. I´ll try to get more info about it. FkpCascais (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
The link you posted in my talk page (roquesantacruz.com) explains it all. In the first paragraph (starting in 2th line) it says:
"His family is composed of 6 people: His father Don Aproniano Dedicación Santa Cruz, his mother Doña Celina Cantero and his 3 brothers Oscar (22) Diego (19) and Julio (12). He describes himaself as very calm and very dedicated to his brothers:"I get along well with all of them but the one I get along better is Diego who was my room companion and we have allways been very close."
Thank you very much for having found this link. Mistery solved, right? I apologise to you if I was harsh on you with my first comment, and whenever you need anything, translations or whatever else, please don´t hesitate to ask. :) FkpCascais (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

AIV[edit]

Something went wrong with your edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism causing the page to be messed up, and I had to revert it. Can you please re-report if necessary? Thanks. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, WTM. You have new messages at Skier Dude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Poland 2012[edit]

I don't know whether they are or aren't taking part, but I'm damn sure that Nightwish, Justin Bieber and Monty Python weren't in the national selection... Nice catch. Peridon (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Donald Hewlett[edit]

"Absurdal reference. www2.freebmd.org.uk refers to some Donald M. Hewlett, born DECEMBER 1920, mother's name Marland."

Not born December 1920, but birth registered in the December quarter (Oct-Dec). And yes this is him - his middle name is Marland according to his obits. Crisso (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petr Rada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC Bohemians Prague (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision of Longest words[edit]

Thanks for helping to clean up Longest words! It sure needed it. I have a question, though, regarding your latest revision to the page. You changed a word from "old-fashioned" to "dative." Is this what you meant or did you mean "dated?" The latter is a grammatical term that is perfectly acceptable, but I just wanted to make sure since I have no knowledge of Polish whatsoever. ;) Thanks! WikiWinters (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikicology. I noticed that you recently removed some content from perseids without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wikicology (talk) 00:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicolás Guillén may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Nicolás Cristóbal Guillén Batista''' (10 July 1902 – 16 July 1989 was a [[Cuba]]n poet, journalist, political activist, and writer. He is

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Majorat[edit]

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Majorat, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Flag of Dallas[edit]

Hey there, please take note of the talk page before reverting again. Thanks. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Flag of Dallas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Monika Olejnik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.24.94 (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, WTM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, WTM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, WTM. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)