User talk:Wakari07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Om symbol.svg

please summarise and restart old discussions we had, archived above, down here.
/My Public Favourites /My workspace

Welcoming your input[edit]

Simple definition articles[edit]

Hello Wakari07! I've noticed that some of the articles you've created recently consist of little more than word definitions. For example Bahiraṅga and Antaraṅga. Per WP:NOT: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide." If these articles can't be expanded with encyclopedic content, they should be moved to Wiktionary instead, which is designed specifically for word definition articles. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

They may look like stubs and simple definition articles, but they are concepts of certain philosophies. A student (of Yoga or a dravidian philosophy/religion or any consciousness science) may have good use for this reference at least as disambiguations or, at the very least, as redirects . While they may look as "little more than definitions" now and to the layman, i insist with the little argument i have, to note these (related) concept pairs: Bahiraṅga-Antaraṅga and Sabīja-Nirbīja as reference points rather than just as words. Wakari07 (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
(copy to article's talk pages) Wakari07 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Maybe the subject at the core of the two pairs mentioned, is Cetanā. Wakari07 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Will try to plant a bīja of this in WP:WikiProject Yoga one of these days. Oh my, I forgot: Thanks for your reply. Wakari07 (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I would encourage you to group these words under higher concepts that can be developed into full encyclopedia articles. Alternately, you can use the {{Wiktionary redirect}} template to create a soft redirect to Wiktionary. Wikipedia articles generally don't include sections like "Antonym", "Transliterations", or "Etymology", as they are supposed to be about broad concepts, not individual words (although there are exceptions). These sort of entries are perfectly suited to Wiktionary though. Kaldari (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for the encouragement. I think the unified login works now, that helps ;) Wakari07 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Adventures of Alix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for the message. Wakari07 (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Louis-Pierre Dillais[edit]

Hi, I'm Theopolisme. Wakari07, thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, thanks for the new article -- it seems to use confusing tenses/wording.. you may want to take a quick look. Thanks! Theopolisme 22:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Louis-Pierre Dillais, Wakari07!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see WP:CITE to learn more about the correct formatting of footnotes avoiding the display of bare ULS. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis-Pierre Dillais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Fixed. Wakari07 (talk) 16:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Nuclear power by country[edit]

Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Nuclear power by country and subcategories (4) to Category:Nuclear energy by country Hugo999 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Living Under Drones (academic study) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Living Under Drones (academic study) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Under Drones (academic study) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat[edit]

Hello Wakari07. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Obrigkeitsstaat".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Obrigkeitsstaat}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NIRAS (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on NIRAS (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 08:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Louis-Pierre Dillais for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis-Pierre Dillais is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis-Pierre Dillais until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Whaling by japanese[edit]

the appropriate category for Japanese whaling would be "scandals and opinions". Therefore, it may be inappropriate for the news. Second possible match is "environment and ecology". Tech or science news should describe results or at least firm progress (experimental platform launch, for example), not the claims on progress commonly known to be false in case of Japanese whaling.

Did put it in "Environment and ecology" as per your suggestion. Wakari07 (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)