User talk:WikiTryHardDieHard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, WikiTryHardDieHard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MicroTrac, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kevin (talk) 01:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


Contents

Quote brackets[edit]

Brackets are mainly use to modify or include new material in a quote. I try to keep bitcoin's capitalization consistent through the article so when Krugman used capital "Bitcoin" to refer to the currency, I modified it to "bitcoin". Out of respect for the author, it's custom to put it in brackets after such a modification. --☥NEO (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

That colon did serve a purpose.[edit]

It was used to connect with the words after it and saying ways it's the most popular currency. However, it works as it is. --☥NEO (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

English Country Tune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indie
Tiny and Big: Grandpa's Leftovers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update[edit]

Hey WikiTryHardDieHard. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to List of hitch knots[edit]

Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dead Sky[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dead Sky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gloss • talk 18:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

List of Open Source Android Applications[edit]

Hello, I know you deleted your message on my talk page but I thought I'd respond anyway. The consensus view that was achieved on the talk page completely rejected the notion that the number of downloads establishes notability. In fact that approach is in no way supported by any Wikipedia policy or guideline. The consensus view is to use the already established Wikipedia definition for notability which is that an article should be created for each app first and then linked to in the article. And that each article needs to supply at least two independent and reliable sources that cover the app in significant detail (i.e., listings of apps or one-paragraph reviews or most personal blog posts do not go toward establishing notability). What we need is substantial coverage in notable sources like Wired or CNet in order to establish notability, then create the article, and then link to it at the List of Open Source Android Applications. SQGibbon (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

No problem. The approach to these kinds of articles does vary throughout Wikipedia. Given that this list could stretch literally forever meant that it seemed prudent to use some strict standards, namely the same one used in similar lists on Wikipedia -- general notability. This has the added benefit that any experienced editor patrolling recent changes can quickly see how the page is supposed to operate and can revert or accept any recent change to the article without having to read through the entire talk page to see how we're doing it. That said, the article does need a lot of work and improvement so I hope you'll keep at it. SQGibbon (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wildland fire apparatus[edit]

So I started the article at User:Zackmann08/Wildland fire engine. I keep going back and forth on the name of the article. But I would welcome any contributions! --Zackmann08 (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

That looks good Zack --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 03:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
So article is done. I would LOVE some peer review/editing. Wildland fire engine. I am going to work on adding some redirects to the page, for example Type 3 fire engine. Thanks! --Zackmann08 (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Not The Robots[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Not The Robots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable game. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linux Mint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia requested images[edit]

Hi, please don't add Category:Wikipedia requested images directly to talk pages, as you seem to have been doing quite a lot. If the talk page has WikiProject banners, and those banners have suitable parameters, please use those; if not, the {{Image requested}} template should be used. This has some parameters that allow for appropriate subcategorisation. As an example of the former case, I have taken your edit and fixed it like this. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll do that from now on. Thank you for the information. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cahir Healy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Excessive categories[edit]

Hi, I'm involved in cleanup of the psychology categories. Just wanted to point out that there's no need to put an article in both a category and its subcategory. Psychological concepts can go in the category Psychological concepts, and don't need to be in the Psychology category as well: Psychological concepts is itself categorised under Psychology. If you see me removing some categories from articles you've edited, this is why. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, the relevant guideline is WP:DIFFUSE. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
@MartinPoulter:@Redrose64: I understand. Even after all the time I've been on Wikipedia, I still make plenty of mistakes. Thank you both for the information. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the categories. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Morton[edit]

Hey, thanks for contributing a new article for Wikipedia! Unfortunately I'm worried that it might not meet our inclusion guidelines. As you know, Wikipedia has various guidelines that help establish what articles can be written about, referred to as "notability". The one for Biographies is here: Wikipedia:Notability (people). In simple terms you need to provide sources that talk about the subject in detail, rather than in passing, to build up an overall picture of his career. If you've got any questions I'd be happy to help! --Errant (chat!) 18:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Screenshot of WordGrinder .0.5.1 July 13 2014.png[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of WordGrinder .0.5.1 July 13 2014.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WordGrinder, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Binary and Lua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of cannabis legalization in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Linux Kernel in a Nutshell[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Linux Kernel in a Nutshell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Book does not seem to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MapDroyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Linux Kernel in a Nutshell 1st edition cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Linux Kernel in a Nutshell 1st edition cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Verdun (video game)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Verdun (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Computer game, still in beta (it says). Referencing is to own site, the distributor, and another that doesn't really establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

CrossFit Clean-up[edit]

Thanks for taking care of that. Are you going to clean-up the formatting as well? Now that the content has been removed it leaves list of large/bold font items, each with citations. It's pretty ugly as is. Arbalest Mike (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of medical mnemonics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MONA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Fire Service[edit]

Hello! I've been doing some major work on the WP:FD and am looking for some people to help me. I've seen you active on some fire pages and wanted to see if you were interested? Let me know! --Zackmann08 (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Service[edit]

Hello and good afternoon (at least it is afternoon where I am). I was looking at the Wikipedian firefighters category and noticed that you are one of the members of the Wikipedia community that lists yourself as being a firefighter. First and foremost let me say thank you for your service. While I myself am not a firefighter, I do work as a photographer with multiple local fire departments. I am honored to have firefighters as some of my closest friends.

I have been taking an active role in the Fire Service WikiProject and am trying to recruit more members to this cause. If this is something you have any interest in, please let me know? You can leave me a message on my talk page. Obviously there is zero obligation. An interest can be anything from helping out with a couple of pages in your local area to helping to overhaul major templates, and anything in between.

Once again, thank you for your service. Hope to hear from you soon. Stay safe! --Zackmann08 (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Medical cannabis in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Georgia
Timeline of cannabis legalization in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Georgia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Greensboro Fire Department Logo.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Greensboro Fire Department Logo.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (talk) 20:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Winston-Salem Fire Department Logo 2012.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Winston-Salem Fire Department Logo 2012.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

We should try to use high quality secondary sources such as review articles, major textbooks and position papers. Thus replaced this pilots study with a textbook.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

I hadn't known about the preference for secondary sources. Sorry about that. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
No worries Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Textbook[edit]

I have removed this textbook as it is copied and pasted from Wikipedia [2] (to clarify this textbook has copied from us) There are a few lines of textbooks that are. One wants to use a major medical textbook :-) Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Got it. I removed another use of the reference on scoop stretcher. By the way, I just got done watching your talk at UBC. Very informative.--WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Ukiyo-e[edit]

Please quit this. I'm not the only editor who prefers the plain English of "a large number of" to "numerous", and, more importantly, "Works on late-era Utagawa artists such as Kunisada and Kuniyoshi have revived some contemporary esteem these artists had enjoyed." is simply broken and requires the "of the". If the sentece ended with "esteem", you'd be right, and the "of the" would be superfluous, but the sentence isn't saying merely "some contemporary esteem", but some of a particular amount of esteem that had been lost. The sentence as you've "fixed" it does not mean the same thing. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 01:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant to "thank" you, not revert the edit. My computer seemes to have glitched and hit the wrong button.-WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 01:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Sure—it's not the first time something like that's happened. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 02:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC[edit]

Gooooooood Morning! How are you? Hope you had a great weekend! I've got an RfC going that hasn't generated much traffic. Wanted to see if you might have an opinion that you would care to share on the matter. See here. The question is regarding whether or not to include a long list of disbanded fire companies in the article about the Detroit Fire Department. Anyway, if you have any thoughts on the matter, please chime in! If not, please ignore this and have an awesome monday! Face-smile.svg --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Medical mnemonics[edit]

My apologies for reverting that. A complete mistake on my part. GABHello! 19:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for Comment![edit]

As you have edited a number of pages regarding wildfires, I would love you to comment on this discussion about what qualifies as a current wildfire if you have a moment. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of legal loopholes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of legal loopholes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of legal loopholes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 18:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Conroe Fire Department for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conroe Fire Department is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conroe Fire Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

AWB deletions of wikilinks[edit]

Hi there - I see you're deleting duplicate wikilinks with AWB. While this is often useful I'd like to ask you to stop doing so as simply deleting any duplicate wikilink to an article is often detrimental, as in this edit to reddit: for instance see alsos should never be unlinked and publishers of references can be linked many times as that can be useful when a user views a reference and would like to know more about its publisher. Additionally (not the case in this particular edit), in many articles having duplicate wikilinks can be useful - such as articles whose readership are often just interested in a specific section or lists. Are you using your own software to do these edits?

--Fixuture (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

  • No, I'm just using AWB. After reviewing MOS:DUPLINK it appears I was in the wrong. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Jack Wholey[edit]

You changed the winner of the 1990 Mitchell Bam from Jack Wholey to Jack Wholly. See https://web3.acbl.org/nabcwinnersbyname?name=Jack+Wholey and https://web3.acbl.org/nabcwinners?event=Mitchell+Open+Board-a-Match+Teams for correct spelling of Jack's name. Do you know something we don't know? I'll let you fix it first before correcting it.Nicolas.hammond (talk) 02:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Automated tools can be powerful. With power comes great responsibility.Nicolas.hammond (talk) 02:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)