User talk:Wikiwriter235

Your submission at Articles for creation: WME (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WME and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikiwriter235, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:WME has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:WME. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WME (digital marketing agency) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This doesn't read like an encyclopedic article but more of a series of bullet points.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WME (digital marketing agency) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WME (digital marketing agency) (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Both outrageously promotional and no clear evidence of notability. It cannot really be expected that a company this size is likely to be notable. The references are almost entirely either press releases, mere notices, or local news items. None of that shows notability. Do not resubmit unless you have much better references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources

DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]