User talk:Wildmannn67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Taffer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GABHello! 18:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jon Taffer with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. NottNott talk|contrib 18:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jon Taffer. NottNott talk|contrib 18:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mark Arsten (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Unblock[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wildmannn67 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribscreation logchange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am truly sorry for my offenses and will refrain from doing any such activities in the future

Decline reason:

So why did you continue to make edits like this when you had been explicitly warned what the consequences of your actions would be? I see no useful edits in your contributions, and no reason to unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 19:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.