Nomination of Draft:25 (Adele album) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:25 (Adele album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.21:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:25 (Adele album)
Draft:25 (Adele album), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:25 (Adele album) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:25 (Adele album) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm curious why you reverted my removal of the reference to an examiner.com article in the lead of Americas. That site is on the spam blacklist (which is why the ref is malformed, since it cannot contain a working external link); the consensus at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard appears to be that examiner.com is not to be treated as a reliable source; and the information that is so referenced actually has several scholarly references in the body of the article. So what's the deal? Deor (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)