User talk:WolvResistance

WolvResistance, you are invited to the Co-op![edit]

Hi there! WolvResistance, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michigan Wolverines men's basketball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Orr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Saban[edit]

I noticed you removed sourced material from the Saban article. Please explain why in edit summaries or on the talk page. I reverted your removal for now. But if you feel strongly, just explain why. Thanks! JodyB_talk 12:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Jaaron95. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miami Beach Bowl, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. †ããrøn95^® 18:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Independence Bowl, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. †ããrøn95^® 18:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bahamas Bowl. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. †ããrøn95^® 18:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Corky | Chat? 19:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Bagumba (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WolvResistance (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was hoping to be unblocked because I feel I've served enough time without evasion. Yes, this account is being run by the same guy who used Wkoppel. Thought I wasn't editing or blanking too extensively or disruptively with this account before so I was hoping to have another chance.

Decline reason:

No, creating more sockpuppets is not how you get unblocked. Please read our standard offer for our approach to unblocking indefinitely blocked users. Max Semenik (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WolvResistance (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't planning on making anymore sockpuppets. What I meant was I want this to be my new account. I thought I had to be honest about it and I was. I didn't say I was somebody else. I sincerely ask that you reconsider your decision. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account; we do not unblock accounts created to evade blocks. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 02:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.