User talk:Ww2censor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps important.svgWait! If I tagged your image for deletion, read this page before posting here!Nuvola apps important.svg
Are you here because your article was speedily deleted? Click here before leaving any message.

Crystal package wordprocessing.png
Crystal kword.png
Camera-photo Upload.svg
Blacksmith anvil hammer.svg
Torchlight help red.png
Cornelis Norbertus Gysbrechts - Quodlibet.jpg
Userpage Talk to me Contribute Work Images Tools DYK Ireland Project Philately Portal Philately Project
1. If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply here unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.
2. For image deletion notices please talk to me here but please read the above notice first.
3. When I start discussion on your talk page I will watch your talk page for a while and continue to discuss that topic there. Thanks.

Featured article removal candidates
view edit
Enceladus Review it now
The Signpost
21 July 2016
Picture of the day
Almond Blossoms

Almond Blossoms
Painting: Vincent van Gogh
ArchiveMore featured pictures...

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Geological Survey of Ireland
Postage stamps and postal history of Tristan da Cunha
Postage stamps and postal history of Lebanon
Postage stamps and postal history of Cyprus
P. Felix Ganz
Postage stamps and postal history of New Zealand
List of British post offices abroad
Masthead (publishing)
Oriental Philatelic Association of London
Postage stamps and postal history of Antigua
List of people on stamps of Italy
Calvin Waters Christian
Gilmer belt
Paddy Roy Bates
Blacksod Bay
Nyassa Company
Postage stamps and postal history of Togo
Gregory B. Salisbury
Meter stamp
Hildebrand & Wolfmüller
Postage stamps and postal history of Malta
Gaza flotilla raid
Pobal Chill Chomáin
Policing of the Corrib gas protests
Add Sources
Mulready stationery
List of baronies of Ireland
Postal codes in Sri Lanka
Neopost web-enabled stamps
Chalky paper
Irish people

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion.


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Ww2censor. You have new messages at Mabuska's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2015[edit]

Stop icon
Your recent editing history at Gun politics in Ireland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

I thought I'd return the warning, as you are equally complicit in reverting what I regard as perfectly reasonable edits. In addition, you have not followed any of the advice given in this template: please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. I have. And I have made effort to engage in discussion about your objection. I have also given a citation with regard to the correct grammar, as appropriate in English relevant to this article's region. Please note that I will be looking to find assistance from a (hopefully) objective third party, just as soon as I work out what and where I have to type something. Bear in mind that the 3RR rule a) does not have to be enforced - it's just a policy, and b) it can also be enforced if fewer than three reverts are made in a 24 hour period. Presumably it can also be enforced if three or more reverts are made outside a 24 hour period, too. It is my hope that asking for assistance from someone who is more experienced in how to deal with this kind of 'warring' will result in neither of us being blocked or otherwise punished. As a final note, before delving into the crazy world of Wikipedia red tape, I will say that I am perfectly fine with standing down on this issue if it can be proven to me that my grammatical changes to the article are in error. But I see no reason to keep reverting my edit with no good or reasonable evidence to back up your assertions and accusations, and without an attempt to enter into reasonable diaglogue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 05:14, 8 October 2015‎

CIA invert[edit]

All the info is in the two new sources I added (Arago and the other). BF — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFolkman (talkcontribs) 18:30, 3 November 2015‎

Orphaned non-free revisions[edit]

Hi Ww2censor. Just for the record, I did not tag File:InacioFortaleza.png with Template:Di-orphaned fair use; I tagged it with Template:Orphaned non-free revisions. If you read the latter template, you'll see that it says "The previous version(s) of this file are non-free. The older revision(s) are no longer being used in articles, and therefore fail the Wikipedia non-free content criteria. The current version will not be deleted, only previous revision(s)." -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Image mashups[edit]

Apologies for continually bothering you, but you seem willing to help. It seems the extracted from template doesn't support multiple source images, specifically in reference to this image, which is a combination of two images already on commons. Is there another template that supports a combination of images? TimothyJosephWood 13:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

This is not an extracted image but a derived image, so I've fixed it but I also tried to use an extracted but as you say it did not work but {{image extracted|1= |2= }} c:Template:Image extracted does work. Try it in a sandbox. ww2censor (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)