User talk:Ww2censor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps important.svgWait! If I tagged your image for deletion, read this page before posting here!Nuvola apps important.svg
Are you here because your article was speedily deleted? Click here before leaving any message.

1. If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply here unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.
2. For image deletion notices please talk to me here but please read the above notice first.
3. When I start discussion on your talk page I will watch your talk page for a while and continue to discuss that topic there. Thanks.

Featured article removal candidates
view edit
Assata Shakur Review it now
The Signpost
24 November 2017

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Geological Survey of Ireland
Postage stamps and postal history of Tristan da Cunha
Postage stamps and postal history of Lebanon
Postage stamps and postal history of Cyprus
P. Felix Ganz
Postage stamps and postal history of New Zealand
List of British post offices abroad
Masthead (publishing)
Oriental Philatelic Association of London
Postage stamps and postal history of Antigua
List of people on stamps of Italy
Calvin Waters Christian
Gilmer belt
Paddy Roy Bates
Blacksod Bay
Nyassa Company
Postage stamps and postal history of Togo
Gregory B. Salisbury
Meter stamp
Hildebrand & Wolfmüller
Postage stamps and postal history of Malta
Gaza flotilla raid
Pobal Chill Chomáin
Policing of the Corrib gas protests
Add Sources
Mulready stationery
List of baronies of Ireland
Postal codes in Sri Lanka
Neopost web-enabled stamps
Chalky paper
Irish people

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion.


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Ww2censor. You have new messages at Mabuska's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2015[edit]

Stop icon
Your recent editing history at Gun politics in Ireland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

I thought I'd return the warning, as you are equally complicit in reverting what I regard as perfectly reasonable edits. In addition, you have not followed any of the advice given in this template: please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. I have. And I have made effort to engage in discussion about your objection. I have also given a citation with regard to the correct grammar, as appropriate in English relevant to this article's region. Please note that I will be looking to find assistance from a (hopefully) objective third party, just as soon as I work out what and where I have to type something. Bear in mind that the 3RR rule a) does not have to be enforced - it's just a policy, and b) it can also be enforced if fewer than three reverts are made in a 24 hour period. Presumably it can also be enforced if three or more reverts are made outside a 24 hour period, too. It is my hope that asking for assistance from someone who is more experienced in how to deal with this kind of 'warring' will result in neither of us being blocked or otherwise punished. As a final note, before delving into the crazy world of Wikipedia red tape, I will say that I am perfectly fine with standing down on this issue if it can be proven to me that my grammatical changes to the article are in error. But I see no reason to keep reverting my edit with no good or reasonable evidence to back up your assertions and accusations, and without an attempt to enter into reasonable diaglogue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 05:14, 8 October 2015‎

CIA invert[edit]

All the info is in the two new sources I added (Arago and the other). BF — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFolkman (talkcontribs) 18:30, 3 November 2015‎

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi Ww2censor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:50, Wednesday, October 12, 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi Ww2censor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:28, Wednesday, August 9, 2017 (UTC)

Article Resubmitted Following Your Comments[edit]

Dear Ww2censor,

This is just to let you know that I have now formally resubmitted the article on which you gave me such helpful comments last month. It is much improved as a result. Fingers crossed!

Linnaean Street (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC) Linnaean Street

Thank you[edit]

Hadn't noticed that I'd put Biddy White Lennon in as c-class at all - thought I'd put them all in as stub. So thanks for catching that and upgrading it - I didn't think it was much better than stub. ☕ Antiqueight haver 18:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Antiqueight for responding. No problem. For me, and I have assessed many hundreds, maybe even thousands of Irish articles, stub-quality is really only a few sentences and start has a few paragraphs, so this was easily a start-quality for me. However, it is all rather subjective. ww2censor (talk) 19:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ww2censor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Hello, Ww2censor.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)