User talk:The undertow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:XF Law)
Jump to: navigation, search


Talk about a blast from the past, there is a name I haven't seen in a very long time. How ya doin? — Ched :  ?  13:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Very well. How are you? the_undertow talk 04:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Made it through another birthday, and I bitch about my health - but every day above ground eh? I miss seeing you around buddy. Hmmmm ... think maybe I might have you on Facebook, but I don't really do that too often anymore either. Anyway - it was really great seeing your sig pop up .. blast from the past and all that. You thinking of getting back to editing here? It'd be great to work with you again. MZM is still around. Lara's been busy IRL. Not sure how many of the old BRC are still hangin in there .. Evula is. Anyway .. I'm just violating the crap outta WP:NOTSOCIAL here, but good to touch base with you. — Ched :  ?  19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Wales on millionaire.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wales on millionaire.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I went ahead and explained why I do not agree with your rationale, as the file I uploaded is superior in quality and relevance, compared to the file you feel I have duplicated. the_undertow talk 16:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:DramaOut.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DramaOut.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 88 Precepts[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article 88 Precepts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 88 Precepts[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 88 Precepts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dave Dial (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3rd eye (Tool song - sample).ogg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:3rd eye (Tool song - sample).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)