Hi there, I have declined your speedy request for What is Troo? because the page did not constitute patent nonsense, in the Wikipedia sense of the word. Please keep in mind that the sorts of articles that can be deleted using the CSD G1 criteria are intentionally quite narrow, and that you need to be careful when you're CSD tagging to make sure that you use an applicable criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC).
- I also went through Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions and the section on Non-criteria, specifically Neologisms.
- This particular article - it starts with "Troo is a word that originated from two friends, Kevin Perrini and Jonathan Canales, that can be used as a noun, verb, or adjective. There is no actual definiton to "troo", but it mainly means either something gangster as fuck, or something awesome as hell."
- Surely noone would mind speedy deleting *this*?
- Thanks for the note on CSD, I'll keep it in mind.
03:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- No, I certainly wouldn't mind the article being deleted, but at the same time we need to stay within the procedures that the community has come to a consensus on about what we can speedy delete. For better or worse, "articles" like that one aren't on the list of things that can be summarily deleted. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC).
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
- Thanks 07:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
1-why in fix bias base collector junction is reverse bias ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)