User talk:Xx236

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

2017 Home United FC season[edit]

Huh? What do you mean? User:CO16 (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2016(SG Time)

Yeah the season has not started yet that's why I put "Not started" for the best result. And can you help to improve it? Your help will be appreciated.User:CO16 (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2016
Aiyo cannot wait one meh? Just created the page later then put la. Impatient. Talk so much cannot help meh? Only know how judge. Judgemental

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

  • we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
    • assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
  • once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
  • you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
  • we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
  • also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
  • did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
  • we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
  • automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
  • Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Season's greetings![edit]

Yo Ho Ho[edit]

Love Light In Flight[edit]

Sorry for the delay. I blanked Love Light In Flight as it was poorly written and was on the vergeof being deleted anyway.

ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps not editing in this subject area is a good thing. I do not edit these subjects any longer - too much negative emotions from interactions with other users. Besides, the books by historians can not explain what it really was. This is something only art can do. For example, one can watch movies like Cargo 200 (film) and "Kochegar" by Balabanov or even something like movies by Sergei Loznitsa... My very best wishes (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
I would advise you not edit pages Lenin and Stalin, including talk pages, as I already said here. You were too close to be topic banned, and at least some your comments on these talk page are questionable. You may be topic banned next time if you continue doing the same. My very best wishes (talk) 00:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Xx236,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 437 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Antimache page[edit]

Please remove the speedy deletion tag if you feel that my page does not violate the copyright standards. Thank you.Markx121993 (talk) 07:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Topic banned[edit]

Xx236, this note is to inform you that after this ANI discussion, [1], you are indefinitely topic-banned from the topic of the Soviet Union, broadly construed. This includes both editing articles within this topic, as well as discussions about this topic anywhere else on Wikipedia. Any infringement of this ban may result in your account being blocked without warning for a duration of the administrator's discretion. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator. You may appeal this sanction at the administrator's noticeboard. You may also appeal to me directly on my talk page. The ban remains in force during an appeal until you have been notified of an official change. Vanamonde (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Good by[edit]

I don't accept the rules of this Wikipedia - censorship, denouncing, Western cultural colonialism.Xx236 (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

  • It may be better if you focus on Polish Wikipedia. Contributing on English one requires more language fluency, misunderstandings created by poor communications don't help. Take care, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with my English errors. Please choose my edit from my history and explain me.

Xx236 (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Xx236. This request is very global. Are you just looking for an example? In your request above, "Please choose my edit from my history and explain me", this would read better in English if you wrote: "please choose an edit from my editing history and explain the errors in it to me". The "me" instead of "an" is not wrong per se, but it reads poorly. The missing "it to" in the last part of the sentence, though, makes the sentence present as broken English. You simply cannot say "explain me", you have to say "explain it to me". Again, choose something specific and then I suggest using a diff view to present it for evaluation. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I'd say your commentary on talk pages usually is extremely short, so short that context is missing. Take for example these three edits. The first is OK, the second is in quote marks as if it were a quote (which for all I can tell it isn't), and it's a fragment, without a subject. If the third has any connection to the first two, as might be surmised from its being posted in the same section right after the other two, I don't see it. In combination, it's unclear what the purpose of that section is. Do you merely not understand the wording? Do you think it should be removed because it's not supported by the body of the article? Were you planning to add something to the body of the article that would resolve the problem and wondered whether your source was good enough? I can't tell. That makes it very difficult to answer you appropriately. Huon (talk) 23:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Mowiac po polsku: wiele twoich postow czyta sie jak fragmenty: niedokoczone, bez kontekstu. Ot, [2] chyba chciales sie zapytac, jak przetlumaczyc tytul ksiazki, ale dlaczego zmuszasz innych do zgadywania o co ci chodzi? Jesli napisanie pelnego zdania po angielsku jest za trudne, albo jesli ci sie po prostu nie chce... ani jedno, ani drugie nie zachaca do dyskusji. Nie musisz pisac esejow, ale po prostu, pisz pelne zdania, wyjasniajace o co ci chodzi. Mowiac prosto z mostu - za duzo twoich postow czyta sie jak pisane 'na odwal', a to nie nastawia innych edytorow pozytywnie do kontynuowania dyskusji.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Zycie nie jest sprawiedliwe. O niesprawidliwosci na Wikipedii, ktorej doswiadczylem osobiscie i to podobnie jak ty (tracac uprawnienia adminskie, dostajac topic bana, i to tez przez jakis 'lewakow') pisalem i ja User:Piotrus/Morsels of wikiwisdom, pisal i Darek J. w swojej ksiazce, ktora polecam ([3]). Doradzam nie poddawac sie. Ja swoje 'ocenzurowanie' przeczekalem piszac art. w brudnopisie, i dzialajac na pl wiki czy wikisource. Nie daj sie 'lewakom' zamknac. Powodzenia, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
No na pol wiki reguly sa... malo ich jest, wiec wieksze widzimisie. Ale dziala jak tu, czyli 'jakos'. Smutno mi, ze jestes zniechecony, ale powtarzam - nie daj sie. Sprobuj cos troche innego w ramach relaksu. Kategoryzacja obrazow na Commons, np., jest dla mnie takim czyms na relaks. Mogli zakazac pisac, ale nie zakazali robienie zdjec i dodwania ich do kolekcji. Co drugie muzeum dalej nie ma wlasnej galerii na Commons. Jak nie lubisz zdjec, mozna poprawiac kategorie, rysowac mapki czy diagramy, itp. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Xx236, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)