User talk:Yaris678

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Four years of adminship[edit]

Wikipe-tan mopping.svg
Wishing Yaris678 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Request Change to Breitbart[edit]

This less biased source refers to Breitbart as nationalist and populist, not far right. May I make the change? https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/10/conservative-media-face-a-post-bannon-landscape-335799 Campbell301 (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

The description identifying Breitbart as "far right" shows political bias on the part of Wikipedia and needs to be edited. I agree with User:Campbell301. Dsnow3 15:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

RPP[edit]

Hi, I had requested protection for Royal Navy which you added, but the level is now "Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access". My understanding is that only requires 4 days and 10 edits to reach that level. Many of disruptive edits to that page are made by new 'throw away' accounts as opposed to using IP access. I had requested "Extended confirmed" or higher... is that possible? If so, could you upgrade the protection? If not, then I suppose I need to propose this a level of protection to be created and made a available. Where would I do that? Thanks - theWOLFchild 07:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Wolf Child,
None of the throw-away accounts were autoconfirmed. Therefore, they wouldn't have been able to edit the page with the current protection level. If the page starts to get abused by autoconfirmed accounts, then we can upgrade the protection to extended-confirmed protection.
Yaris678 (talk) 07:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

RFC on microagression page[edit]

Hello Yaris678. There is an RfC on the microagression article talk page which might be of interest to you given your previous work on this page. - Pengortm (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Recent page move[edit]

Hi, I have been working on pages with incorrect ref formatting, and the following page List of lists of exoplanets, shows in the history that you recently moved it. I'm not sure what is going on with that page but it has 2 See also sections, 2 External links sections and 2 References sections. I don't know if it was like that before you moved it, or if it happened during the move. I was going to fix the cite errors, but I'm afraid I might screw it up worse. What do you think? Thanks-- Isaidnoway (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

That weirded me out for a bit. The page wasn't how I remembered... but I think I have worked out what is going on and fixed it.
The issues seems to be with transcluding sections from the article Exoplanet, and this change, which removes the <section end=detection /> tag. This means that the entire or the remainder of the article was transcluded.
I have made this change to the Exoplanet article, which has fixed the problem.
Yaris678 (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)